No Evidence Against Muslim Man Accused In Forced Conversion Case: UP Govt To Allahabad HC

Image Credit: NDTV

The Logical Indian Crew

'No Evidence Against Muslim Man Accused In Forced Conversion Case': UP Govt To Allahabad HC

"There is no evidence found that the accused Nadeem is having an illicit relation with Parul, nor has any evidence come forward that he tried to change the religion of Parul," the UP government admitted in an affidavit.

The Uttar Pradesh government, on January 7, told the Allahabad High Court that there is no evidence against a Muslim man who was among the first in the state to be charged under UP's new law against "Love Jihad", NDTV reported.

Two days after the UP ordinance against forced conversions was passed, Nadeem, 32, and his brother Salman were named in a complaint on November 29, 2020, by Akshay Kumar Tyagi, who works as a labour contractor.

Akshay had claimed Nadeem, a labourer, used to visit his residence in Muzaffarnagar and had "trapped" his wife Parul in a "web of love" to forcibly convert her. Nadeem had gifted her a smartphone to seduce her and promised to marry her, Akshay alleged in the FIR.

Last month, the Allahabad High Court said that the police cannot take any action against Nadeem and granted him protection from arrest until the next date of hearing, which was January 7.

"The victim is admittedly an adult who understands her well-being. She as well as the petitioner have a fundamental right to privacy and to being grown-up adults who are aware of the consequences of their alleged relationship," the court had said in its order.

The court will now hear the case on January 15.

"When the case was taken up in the honourable High Court today, the state gave an affidavit that said naming them in the FIR under the anti-conversion law was found to be false and nothing was found in the investigation that he tried to forcibly convert the woman for marriage. As far as the challenge to the Act goes, the main ground is that Article 25 guarantees that any person is free to choose his or her religion and the challenge is that the govt is interfering in our private affairs," Nadeem's lawyer Syed Farman Ahmad Naqvi said.

"The Investigating officer has found that it is not a case of UP Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Ordinance 2020 and the Act UP Ordinance No. 21 of 2020... There is no evidence found that the accused Nadeem is having an illicit relation with Parul, nor has any evidence come forward that he tried to change the religion of Parul," a six-page affidavit filed by Awadhesh Pandey, Joint Director, Prosecution, on behalf of the UP government states.

The affidavit, however, mentioned that the investigating officer found evidence that Nadeem had threatened Akshay, and so a charge-sheet for "criminal intimidation and provocation causing a breach of public peace" had been submitted on December 31.

Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's Cabinet on November 24 cleared the Ordinance, proposing a maximum punishment of 10 years for "love jihad" related offences. Under the law, a marriage will be declared "null and void" if the conversion of a woman is solely for that purpose, and those willing to change their religion post-marriage need to apply to the district magistrate.

Apart from Uttar Pradesh, several other states have introduced similar laws aimed at preventing inter-faith marriage.

In February, early this year, the Centre had told the Lok Sabha that no "case of 'love jihad' had been reported by any of the central agencies".

Also Read: Farmers Send Trucks Of Firewood For Protesters To Fight Delhi's Harsh Winters, Unseasonal Rains

Contributors Suggest Correction
Writer : Navya Singh
,
Editor : Prateek Gautam
,
Creatives : Rajath

Must Reads