The Centre told the Delhi High Court that messaging platform Telegram ignored repeated warnings and failed to address concerns over channels allegedly facilitating exam-related fraud ahead of the NEET-UG 2026 re-examination.
Defending its temporary restrictions on the platform, the government argued that Telegram had become a “new dark web” and was being exploited by criminals, terrorists, cyber fraudsters and organised cheating networks to circulate fake and leaked question papers and evade accountability.
Telegram has challenged the move, maintaining that it cooperated with authorities, removed unlawful content and that restricting an entire platform is disproportionate. The Delhi High Court heard arguments from both sides as it examined whether the government’s action was justified and proportionate.
Telegram Failed To Act On Warnings
During the hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told the court that the government possesses “something shocking” that would justify its decision to restrict Telegram during the re-examination period.
According to government officials, Telegram was repeatedly alerted about channels allegedly spreading fake or leaked NEET papers and enabling exam malpractice but failed to adequately address these concerns. The restrictions, imposed under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act until June 22, are aimed at safeguarding the integrity of the examination process.
The National Testing Agency (NTA) has backed the government’s stance, arguing that strong measures are necessary to curb misinformation and organised cheating that could undermine the credibility of one of India’s largest entrance examinations.
Telegram Challenges Ban, Cites User Impact
Telegram has opposed the restrictions before the Delhi High Court, arguing that it has consistently complied with valid legal requests and removed content found to violate its policies. The company said there is no evidence to suggest that Telegram itself facilitated exam fraud and maintained that the actions of a limited number of users should not justify blocking access for its estimated 150 million users in India.
Telegram also defended features such as message editing, stating that they serve legitimate communication purposes and are widely used across the platform. The dispute follows heightened scrutiny of digital platforms after concerns emerged over the circulation of alleged leaked and fake NEET question papers online. The court has asked both parties to place relevant material on record before deciding the legality and proportionality of the restrictions.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
Ensuring fair and transparent examinations is critical, particularly when the futures of lakhs of students depend on them. However, measures that affect access to widely used digital platforms must be transparent, evidence-based and proportionate to the risks involved. The case highlights the growing challenge of tackling online misconduct while protecting digital rights and access to information.
As technology platforms become increasingly central to public life, how can governments, educational institutions and tech companies collaborate more effectively to prevent exam fraud without disrupting the everyday communication needs of millions of users?
