Minor Children Can Choose To Not Live With Their Parents: Delhi High Court

The Logical Indian Delhi

April 28th, 2017 / 11:39 AM

Minor Children Can Choose To Not Live With Their Parents

Courtesy: financialexpress | Image Credit: legaltrigger fmslawgroup

“Children have the liberty to choose not to live with their parents. Even minor children have the liberty,” the Delhi High Court ruled on Thursday.

The oral observation was made by a bench comprising Justices Vipin Sanghi and Deepa Sharma during a habeas corpus plea hearing of a man for tracing his missing daughter and to hand over her custody to him.

The 15-year old girl was traced from Mathura, Uttar Pradesh a few days back. She told the police and the Child Welfare Committee (CWC) that she did not wish to return to her parents.

The Court refused to hand over her custody and also noted that the minor girl was safe at the shelter home where she is presently being kept, and that she apprehended harm if sent back to her parents, as reported by The Financial Express.

The bench further added that the father will have to move a plea before a magisterial court for custody of his daughter, however, the parents can meet the girl at the shelter if she is willing.

As per a status report filed by the Delhi Police, the girl had absconded from home in July last year after falling in love with a 32-year-old man who used to work near her house.

Senior standing counsel of the Delhi government Rahul Mehra and advocate Tushar Sannu, representing the police, said she had run away to Mathura where the man lived, and got married after she threatened to commit suicide if he did not agree.

Thereafter, the 15-year old was living alone in a rented room in Mathura, arranged for by the man who paid her a visit her once a week to provide money and groceries.

Her statement was recorded before a magistrate on April 25, following which she was taken to a shelter home as she did not wish to return to her parents, police said. It also added that an FIR has been lodged against the man with whom she had eloped.

While a person should not have to live with somebody forcibly, the Court’s judgment is little ambiguous considering minor children need guardians.


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Public Has Right To Know; Supreme Court To Live Stream Court Proceedings

Supreme Court

Delhi Not A ‘Full State’, L-G Can’t Be Obstructionist: Supreme Court On Delhi CM Vs L-G Issue

Adult Couples Can Live Together Even If Not Married, Says Supreme Court

To Curb Accidents, Hyderabad Police Jailed 26 Parents In Two Months For Allowing Their Minor Children To Drive.

Mere Physical Contact, Even Though Unwelcome, Would Not Amount To Sexual Harassment: Delhi High Court

Madras High Court Banners Living Persons

Pictures Of Living Persons Can’t Be Used For Banners & Hoardings: Madras High Court

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Govt Overlooks Major Concerns While Proposing New Groundwater Rules

News

Karnataka: Cabinet Gives Nod To Amend RTE Act; To Give First Preference To Govt Schools

Exclusive

Meet Meerut’s Club 60, A Group Of Senior Citizens Working Towards A Greener Environment

Get Inspired

Going Forward: After Two Trains Ran Over His Legs, This Man Found A Passion For Dancing

Fact Check

Fact Check: From Pakistan’s Flag Waved In Rajasthan To Rahul Gandhi’s U-Turn On Loan Waiver

Awareness

Central Govt Spent Rs 5,245 Cr On Ads Since 2014 Says Union Minister Rajyavardhan Rathore

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.