SC: Universities And Colleges Should Refund Fee To Students Withdrawing From The Courses

The Logical Indian

December 20th, 2016

Universities & Colleges Refund Fee Students

Source: The Times of India | Representational Image: parishkar | financialexpress

The Supreme Court on 8 December upheld that a University is bound to refund fees if a student withdraws admission. In Bihar School Examination v/s Suresh Prasad Sinha, the court held that examination fee paid by a student is not for availing any service. It is the charge paid for the participation in the test. The students are not a consumer, and nor is the board a ‘service provider,’. 

A few months ago, the Maharashtra State Commission passed an amendment that categorised services rendered by educational institutions and exams that are conducted by Boards and universities, separately. This change was confirmed by the National Commission in Revised Petition 3288 of 2016 on 8 December.

The issue surfaced again when Megha Gupta who had taken admission for a BTech Course at Mody University of Science and Technology at Sikar, Rajasthan filed a complaint against the University. She lodged a complaint when the university did not refund the fee of Rs 1,44,000 and forfeited the entire amount when she decided not to join the course and requested a withdrawal, as reported by The Times of India.

The dispute reached National Commission, and the University said that the complaint was not affirmative before the consumer forum stating Bihar School Examination v/s Suresh Prasad Sinha case.

The National Commission observed the Supreme Court’s decision and said that it was in the context of Statutory Board or University as a service provider for conducting academic examinations.

It also stressed that SC judgement did not lay down any abstract proposition of law that a student seeking admission in an educational institution can never be a consumer of that particular institution. Emphasising the same point, the commission rejected the University’s argument that the complaint of the customer is not maintainable. It stated that since Medha’s grievance was about unfair trade practice of non-refund of fees, she was entitled to approach consumer fora for redressal of her grievance, as reported by The Times of India.

The Bench headed by Justice DK Jain, M Shreesha upheld that the University has to refund her fees amounting to Rs 1,44,000 within four weeks and if delayed it will have to pay interest at 9% p.a.

Colleges and educational institutions are now bound to refund the fees as per the University Grants Commission guidelines.

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Fee Hike Private Schools

Delhi Govt Directs 575 Private Schools To Refund Excess Fee With 9% Interest

Christ University

Christ, Manipal & Others Drop ‘University’ From Name After UGC Directive

IRCTC

Consumer Court Asks IRCTC To Pay Rs 25,000 To Passenger For Sending Wrong Text Alert

Samsung Defective Television

Telangana: District Consumer Court Orders Customer To Pay Rs 10,000 To Samsung For Defective TV

No Detention Policy

Union Cabinet Approves Bill That Allows Schools To Fail Students In Std V & VIII

Now Builders Can Be Arrested For Failing To Hand Over Flats

Latest on The Logical Indian

Get Inspired

Tripura: Father-Daughter Duo’s Presence Of Mind Averts Major Train Accident, Authorities Promise Reward

News

Bihar: Refused To Give Free Vegetables To Cop, 14-Year-Old Rots In Jail For 3 Months

Exclusive

Telangana: This IPS Officer Is Saving Lives By Fighting The Menace Of Fake News

Awareness

5,000 Fine If Caught With Plastic Bag, Maharashtra Plastic Ban From Tomorrow

Awareness

Know About Justice Chelameswar Who Retired Today After A Seven-Year Tenure In Supreme Court

News

Bank Whose Director Is Amit Shah Collected Rs 745 Crore Worth Old Notes During Demonetisation: RTI