Rafale Deal: SC Dismisses Objection Raised By Centre; Says ‘Leaked Documents’ Admissible

The Logical Indian Crew India

April 10th, 2019 / 1:42 PM

SC Examine Review Petition Rafale Deal

Image Credit: India TV

The Supreme Court bench on April 10 dismissed objections raised by the Centre against the pleas filed for reviewing the SC’s decision on Rafale deal. The three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Ranjan Gogoi said, “We deem it proper to dismiss the Union’s plea.”


SC dismisses Centre’s plea

The SC said that all the review pleas in the Rafale deal will be heard by the court, the date for which will be fixed. The apex court further added that all the defence related documents are allowed to be reviewed.

CJI Gogoi further said that for examining the review petition, the court will consider the papers. He added that the review petition would be considered on the basis of the three documents whose admissibility was earlier questioned. Petitioner Arun Shourie said that he was elated by court’s decision.


Centre’s earlier objection to the documents presented

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) in its affidavit submitted to the Supreme Court said that documents attached by the petitioners in the Rafale deal review case are sensitive to national security. MoD in its affidavit held the petitioners guilty of leaking sensitive information of the Rafale deal and for “putting National Security in jeopardy.”

The Supreme Court on March 14 reserved orders on the preliminary objections raised by the government regarding the “privileged” documents in the Rafale deal case. The court was hearing a review petitions filed by Prashant Bhushan, Yashwant Sinha and Arun Shourie against the court verdict dismissing all petitions seeking court-monitored probe into the Rafale deal.

Attorney General KK Venugopal, representing the government said in the Rafale review case that the documents so presented by petitioners were privileged documents which could not be considered in evidence. He cited Section 123 of the Indian Evidence Act, saying that the documents are protected under the Official Secrets Act. AG further said that the disclosure is exempted under Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act.

However, the SC had said that the RTI overrides the Official Secrets Act as per Section 22 of RTI act. He further added that Section 24 of the RTI Act does not exempt security and intelligence establishments from disclosing information pertaining to corruption and human rights violation.


Also Read: SC Reserves Orders On Objections Raised By Govt Regarding ‘Privileged’ Documents In Rafale Deal


Contributors

Written by : Shraddha Goled

Edited by : Bharat Nayak

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Rafale Deal Waivers

Rafale Deal: “Exceptional & Unprecedented Waivers” Given By Modi Govt In Offset Contracts, Says Report

RTI Overrides Official Secrets Act SC

SC Reserves Orders On Objections Raised By Govt Regarding ‘Privileged’ Documents In Rafale Deal

Rafale Deal Documents Stolen

“Documents Related To Rafale Deal Have Been Stolen”: Attorney General Of India To Supreme Court

Rafale Deal CAG

While The Hindu Report Says Rafale Deal Not Better Than UPA Era, CAG Says It Is 2.86% Cheaper

Rafale Deal Anti-Corruption Penalties

Rafale Deal: Indian Government Waived Provisions For Anti-Corruption Penalties, Says The Hindu Report

Rafale Deal Parallel Negotiations

Defence Minister Says Report Saying “PMO Holding Parallel Negotiations Undermined Rafale Deal” Is Motivated

Latest on The Logical Indian

Get Inspired

Learning Is Fun: Underprivileged Kids Have A Spectacular Day Out Playing ‘Maths Games’

My Story

My Story: “Until My Last Breath, This Show Will Go On,” Says Anchor Of Most Loved Kannada Quiz Show

News

7 Lakh Crore Bad Loans Written Off In Decade, 80% Of It In Last 5 Yrs: RBI Data

Awareness

Why Does India Still Allow Politicians To Contest From More Than One Constituency?

Fact Check

Fact Check: Girl Saying ‘Chowkidar Chor Hai’ To Poll Predicting Congress’s Lead

News

CJI Accused Of Sexual Harassment And Subsequent Victimization By Former Supreme Court Employee; CJI Responds “Judiciary Is Under Threat”

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.