Punjab Must Share Water With Haryana: Supreme Court

The Logical Indian

November 11th, 2016 / 10:49 AM

Punjab-Haryana Water Dispute

Source: tribuneindia | Representational Image: factly

The decades-long legal dispute between Punjab and Haryana on the sharing of river waters has finally come to an end. The Supreme Court has ended the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004. It declared in its verdict today that Punjab must share water with its neighbor Haryana and it is illegal to bypass the law which has been enacted in the interest of the state.


What is the issue?
The issue goes back to the creation of the state of Haryana. After Partition, a dispute arose between India and Pakistan on the sharing of water from the rivers of Punjab: Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej. The two countries signed the Indus Water Treaty in 1960, under which both were allowed unrestricted use of three rivers each. India was allocated the eastern rivers – Sutlej, Beas, and Ravi. Once this treaty was signed, the water from these three rivers was shared between Punjab, Delhi, and Jammu and Kashmir. Punjab was reorganized in 1966, and the state of Haryana was established. As a successor state, Haryana was eligible to receive a share of Punjab’s river waters. The river Yamuna – whose course took it  through undivided Punjab but now flowed only in Haryana – was never considered a part of this arrangement. This led to contention between Punjab and Haryana and in 1979, Haryana approached the Supreme court to implement the allocation. and Punjab filed a civil suit as a challenge to the agreement.
The construction of the canal that would carry water from Punjab to Haryana was dropped.


The Judgement

With the judgment passed today, the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act, 2004 becomes invalid. The agreement through which Punjab had terminated its pacts with Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Jammu and Kashmir, Delhi and Chandigarh for sharing the water of Ravi and Beas rivers was struck down by the Supreme Court today.

The Bench headed by Justice Anil R Dave said that the 2004 act was in violation of the apex court judgments, the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, and other Constitutional provisions.  A five-judge constitution bench said that Punjab cannot unilaterally wriggle out of an agreement involving other states.The court also said that the Sutlej Yamuna Canal or SYL canal, proposed for water-sharing between Punjab and Haryana, has to be completed. Owing to this decision, the Supreme Court has also rejected Haryana’s plea for extending the status quo order passed on March 17, 2016. The plea mentioned  that Punjab did not notify the state about the law meant for returning about 4,000 acres of land acquired for the construction of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link SYL canal.

The farmers of Haryana says that they are elated to hear about the decision of the court, and now they will be able to grow vegetables, which are more profitable, throughout the year.


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

SC False Rape Case

Haryana: Supreme Court Acquits Two Rape Accused After They Spent Years In Jail

Shimla Water Crisis: High Court Asks Special Water Supply to VIPs, Officers and Ministers To Be Cut

Punjab: CM Announces Waiver Of State’s Share Of GST On Langar Items For Golden Temple

Cauvery Verdict: Supreme Court Asks Karnataka To Release 177.25 TMC Of Water To Tamil Nadu

Restaurants To Face Jail, Fine For Selling Mineral Water Above MRP: Centre To Supreme Court

Divorce

Mumbai: Family Court Upholds Supreme Court Ruling, Waives Off 6 Month Waiting Period In Divorce

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Indian Govt Proposed Reliance Name For Rafale Deal, We Didn’t Have A Say In This: Ex-French President

News

Journalist Arrested For Satire On Konark Temple, Odisha Govt Passes Privilege Motion Demanding Action

Get Inspired

Rats Sniff Out Landmines And Save Thousands Of Lives In Africa & Asia, Also Detect Tuberculosis

News

WB: 2 Youths Died As Police Allegedly Open Fired At Students Protesting Urdu Teachers’ Recruitment

My Story

My Story: “Carrying Kirpans Is Even By The Constitution Of India But Why Do I Have To Explain It Everytime?”

Get Inspired

Pune: Hindus, Muslims Come Together To Hold Ganesh Chaturthi & Muharram Proceedings In Same Pandal

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.