UIDAI Publicly Lies About “Mandatory” Linking Of Aadhaar With Mobile SIM, Misquotes SC Order

The Logical Indian Crew

October 3rd, 2017 / 4:42 PM

Image Credits: India, IncArabia

Last week, UIDAI (the statutory body that collects Aadhaar data) again reiterated its stance that the Supreme Court had “directed” the government to ensure that mobile SIMs are linked with Aadhaar before February 2018.



Different telecom service providers have been sending customers messages regarding the same, pushing them to link their Aadhaar number with their mobile number. “As per government’s directive, it is mandatory to link Aadhaar card with your mobile number,” many of these messages read.

By “government’s directive”, the telecom service providers are referring to a directive from the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) dated March 23, 2017. This DoT directive called on all telecom operators to conduct an Aadhaar-based re-verification exercise of all existing pre-paid and post-paid mobile connections by 6 February 2018.

The DoT directive too cited the Supreme Court’s “direction”.


The circular by the Department of Telecommunications.Department of Telecommunications

So what is this SC order that the Dot, telecom companies and UIDAI continuously cite?

Firstly, what is in question is an observation by the SC, and not a direction. The former is a mere statement or reiteration of an argument while the latter is a binding order that has to be followed.

Secondly, the observation in question was made by the apex court in Lokniti Foundation v Union of India (read entire order here) on February 6. This case led to the Court directing the central government to ensure 100% verification of mobile phone subscribers with regard to their identity and ensuring that no fake or unverified identities should be accepted while issuing SIM cards.

The SC asked the government on how this could be achieved.

The government, in turn, filed a counter-affidavit regarding the same and explained how Aadhaar is a way of verifying numbers where authentication is based on consumers’ biometric and demographic data. Additionally, the centre opined that Aadhaar was the best form of e-KYC for new customers.

Know your customer (KYC) is the process of a business identifying and verifying the identity of its clients. The same when done online is called e-KYC. The centre argued that new mobile users could be verified via Aadhaar and existing pre-paid users could be verified when it was their turn for renewal.

The Supreme Court made note of the centre’s arguments and reverted to the issue of phone verification by saying that “a similar verification” would be completed in a year so as to ensure 100% verification of mobile phone subscribers.

Nowhere does the Court state that Aadhaar numbers should be linked with mobile SIMs. The Court merely took cognisance of the centre’s arguments and reverted to its case, hoping that a “similar” process would be adopted (more).

Moreover, nowhere is the plight of post-paid users discussed. This was again because of the fact that the statements made by the Court were an observation, not a directive. The order is only three pages long – how can it even appear to be a directive, which is supposed to be detailed and explanatory?

But the centre has interpreted the Court’s statements as a directive and issued its order directing telecom companies to see to the linking of Aadhaar to SIMs. This is yet another step in the government’s eagerness to increase the scope of Aadhaar. And it has also caused great confusion among consumers, with rumours that noncompliance will lead to deactivation of SIM cards.

Lawyer Apar Gupta, who assisted in the right to privacy case, called the centre’s justification “at best suspect and at worst damages the institutional credibility of the Court”.

It must also be remembered that the apex court is slated to hear pending litigation on Aadhaar in November this year. The elevation of the right to privacy as a fundamental right in August has changed the dynamics of the Aadhaar debate, and critics are saying the government’s haste to link mobile numbers with Aadhaar is uncalled for.

Last but not least, the government, the DoT and UIDAI have remained mum about the SC’s repeated reminders that Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory, in itself or for “any service”. Provided below are a few such instances.


23/9/2013Judis

24/3/2014Courtnic

11/8/2015Archive

15/10/2015Archive

Therefore,

  1. given the misinterpretation of the Supreme Court’s observations as a directive,
  2. given the incomplete nature of the Supreme Court’s observations (when it comes to post-paid users) in the first place,
  3. given that Aadhaar’s mandate has been seriously constrained following the Supreme Court’s right to privacy judgement in August,
  4. given that the legality of Aadhaar itself will be decided by the Supreme Court around November 2017,
  5. given that the Supreme Court has told the centre on numerous occasions in the past that Aadhaar cannot be made mandatory for “any” service,

the question arises as to why the DoT, UIDAI and the central government are not suspending their plans to link Aadhaar and SIM cards, clarify the widespread confusion and wait for an actual directive from the Supreme Court?


Link to Supreme Court ruling here | Link to DoT/government order here


Also read:

  1. There Have Been 5 Major Aadhaar Data Leaks In The Past 4 Days On Government Websites
  2. Aadhaar: Its History, Pros, Cons & Expansion Of Scope By The Govt
  3. Know The Benefits For Which Aadhaar Card Is Going To Be Mandatory Soon

Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Supreme Court Aadhar Mobile

Govt Accepts Supreme Court Never Made Linking Aadhaar to Mobile Compulsory

Baal Aadhaar

UIDAI Introduces Blue Coloured ‘Baal Aadhaar’ For Kids Below 5 Years, Know About It

Aadhaar

UIDAI To Impose 18% GST For Updating Aadhaar

Woman Complains Of Aadhaar Getting Linked To 9 Mobile No. Without Her Knowledge, UIDAI Replies, “Now You Know’’

Karnataka: Aadhaar Project Director’s SIM Disabled Due To Aadhaar Issues

aadhaar, section 139AA

Those Without Aadhaar Need Not Link It To Their PAN To File IT Returns: Supreme Court

Latest on The Logical Indian

Environment

This Top Level Drug Scientist Left His High Profile Job In US To Promote Organic Farming In His Village

News

Gauri Lankesh Murder Suspect Confesses To Involvement In Kalburgi Murder Plot

My Story

My Story: “I Was In Deep Sleep When I Felt Weird Sensation,”This Brave Girl Has Message For Those Who Have Suffered Abuse

News

Two Kids Break Piggy Banks To Donate Entire Money For Kerala Relief Fund

Fact Check

Fact Check: WhatsApp Forwards Claim Mullaperiyar Dam In Kerala About To Break, Govt To Nab Rumour Mongers

TLI Explains

TLI Explains: Know About India’s Draft Data Privacy Bill Which Seeks To Prevent Misuse Of Personal Data

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.