“Religion Should Not Dictate Speech”: Denmark Abolishes 334-Year-Old Blasphemy Law

The Logical Indian Crew

June 6th, 2017

Source: independent, Image source: forgirls.girlscouts

On 2 June 2017, the Danish Parliament voted to scrap the country’s blasphemy law that punishes public insults of a religion.

The law that the politicians abolished was introduced in the year 1683 and was enshrined in Clause 140 of the Danish penal code. It said: “Any person who, in public, ridicules or insults the dogmas or worship of any lawfully existing religious community in this country shall be liable to a fine or to imprisonment for any term not exceeding four months.”

Though the law is over three centuries old, it has only been applied in a handful of cases in Denmark’s modern history. But remarks and acts that threaten or demean certain groups of people because of their religious beliefs will still be punishable.

The decriminalising of “blasphemy” in Denmark adds to the country’s reputation of being among the most secular and egalitarian nations on earth.


Clause 140, Denmark’s 334-years-old blasphemy law.

“There should be no special law to protect religions against free expressions”

Denmark’s blasphemy law was used only in a few cases in the past 80 years – one of them involved two people being fined for conducting a baptism during a masked ball and another involved two public radio officials convicted for broadcasting a song about a woman’s sexuality and her refusal of any divine moral figure. Many other cases were filed but charges were dropped straightaway.

A major highlight of the law’s record was in 2015 when a Danish man was charged with blasphemy after he posted a video of himself burning the Quran. The 42-year-old, who has not been named, burnt Islam’s holy book in a four-minute clip called “Consider your neighbour: it stinks when it burns”.

According to The Independent, this man faced up to four months in prison after prosecutors were alerted to the footage, which was posted to a Facebook group called “Yes to freedom – no to Islam” in December 2015.

All charges against him will now be dropped.

Lawmakers in favour of scrapping the 17th century law said they “do not believe that there should be special rules protecting religions against expressions”.

“Religion should not dictate what is allowed and what is forbidden to say publicly,” Bruno Jerup, an MP who proposed to repeal the law, was quoted as saying by Jyllands-Posten. “It gives religion a totally unfair priority in society,” he said.

Share your thoughts

Realted Stories

Blasphemy Laws

After A Mob Lynched A Student For Alleged “Blasphemy”, Pakistan’s Youth Demand Change In Blasphemy Laws

Mashal Khan

Mashal Khan, A Youth With A Promising Future, Killed By His Own Friends Over A Religious Debate

BR Ambedkar On Hinduism And Islam

What BR Ambedkar Had To Say About Hinduism & Islam

Narendra Nayak

Meet The Man Who Is Fighting The Superstitions In The Society And Trying To Bring Rationality

Supreme Court Asks Should Religion Sentiments

Supreme Court Says Religion Should Be Separated From Political Process

Ramya

A Lawyer Files A Sedition Case Against Ramya For ‘Liking’ Pakistan, Know What It Means & About The Sedition Law

Latest on The Logical Indian

Legal

Private Bill For Marijuana Legalization In Parliament’s Winter Session

News

BSF Jawan, Punjab Police Personnel Deployed To Perform “Marriage Duty” At IG Daughter’s Wedding Venue

News

Punjab: 2 Farmer Brothers Commit Suicide Owing To Debt 10 Yrs After Their Father Had

News

Thousands Of Farmers Gather In Delhi For Freedom From Debt

My Social Responsibility

This Organisation Takes Over Under-performing Govt Schools And Improves Them With The Help Of NGOs

Awareness

For Selling Fridge Without Guarantee Card In Clearance Sale, LG Electronics And Dealer Directed By Consumer Court To Compensate