Amid Anti-CAA Protest, UP Sends List Of Illegal Immigrants To Union Home Ministry

Supported by

January 13th, 2020 / 3:44 PM
/ Updated 1 hours ago
Image Credits:The Times Of India,One India
Uttar Pradesh has become the first state to implement the contentious Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) after the Yogi Adityanath government sent a refugees list across 19 districts in the state to the Union Home Ministry.
The CAA has come into effect from January 10 after the Union home ministry issued a notification.
A report made by the state government – “Uttar Pradesh Mein Aaye Pakistan, Afghanistan Aevam Bangladesh ke Sharnarthio ki Aapbeeti Kahani” consist details of personal stories of refugees most of whom are Hindus from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan, theTimes of Indiareported.
The home department last week had instructed the district magistrate to identify refugees from the three countries and submit a list to the government. On analyzing the report, it was found that 40,000 non-Muslim illegal immigrants have been living in the state in 19 districts including Varanasi, Hapur, Amethi, Plibhit, and Muzaffarnagar.
According to the report the Pilibhit district alone has around 30,000 to 35,000 immigrants.
The contentious CAA has stirred a series of public protests across the country. Several protests in the country have turned violent forcing the police to resort to lathi-charge and open fire in some cases, while at the same time accusing the law enforcers of using excessive force against students.
Throughout the country, the death toll of people killed in police firing during anti-CAA stir has reached 23. In Uttar Pradesh alone 19 people have lost lives since December 10, the highest in any state.
Several states such as West Bengal and Kerala have decided not to implement the CAA.
According to the CAA, Hindu, Christian, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh and Parsi migrants who have illegally entered India, on or before December 31, 2014, from the Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh and have stayed in India for five years will be given the Indian citizenship.
The bone of contention against the Act is the fact it does not provide citizenship to Muslims as it does to Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs and Parsis immigrants even if they do not have documents.Also Read:Five Times Jaggi Vasudev Got Facts Wrong In His Pro-CAA Speech
Contributors
Written by : Debarghya Sil
Edited by : Shubhendu Deshmukh

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

P&G Shiksha

P&G Shiksha Turns 20 And These Stories Say It All

Amplified by

Isha Foundation

Sadhguru’s Meditation App ‘Miracle of Mind’ Hits 1 Million Downloads in 15 Hours, Surpassing ChatGPT’s Early Growth

Recent Stories

No Toll for Two-Wheelers: Nitin Gadkari Dismisses Media Reports as ‘Fake News’

Balika Manch: How an IAS Officer’s Grassroot Movement Stopped 90 Child Marriages, Rewriting the Future of Girls in Tripura

Maharashtra Govt Approves Historic 10% Power Tariff Cut from April; 26% Reduction Over Five Years

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :