Five Year Jail Term For Offensive Posts, Kerala Govt Makes Cyber Defamation Punishable

In its official statement, the government stated that the ordinance is to address the concerns of increasing incidents of crimes perpetrated through social media platforms

Kerala   |   22 Nov 2020 4:13 AM GMT / Updated : 2020-11-22T16:09:56+05:30
Writer : Devyani Madaik | Editor : Rakshitha R | Creatives : Abhishek M
Five Year Jail Term For Offensive Posts, Kerala Govt Makes Cyber Defamation Punishable

The Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan has reportedly signed an ordinance to incorporate the controversial Section 118 (A) in the Kerala Police Act, making defamation, intimidation and insulting of any person on social media, a punishable offence, with imprisonment of up to five years or a fine of Rs 10,000 or both.

Khan's office on Saturday confirmed that he had signed the Kerala Police Act Amendment ordinance made by the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government under which, any individual who produces, publishes or disseminates content through any means of communication to insult or defame any person through social media, has to face repercussions, reported LiveLaw.

In its official statement, the government stated the ordinance is to address the concerns of increasing incidents of crimes perpetrated through social media platforms. The development comes a month after the Kerala cabinet made the recommendation to the Governor. it further stated that the existing laws are insufficient to deal with such crimes, especially after the Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act and Section 118(d) of Kerala Police Act, it said.

However, many people have raised concerns about the effects of this chilling law on free speech and freedom of the press, giving more power to the Police and other concerned authorities.




Speaking on the same, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan told media that the decision was guided by growing abuse on social media targeting individuals, along with an intention to resolve the issue of fake propaganda, hate speech and so forth.

Advocate Anoop Kumaran, who had moved the Supreme Court in 2015 against another Section, 118(D) of the Act. "The government claims that Section 118(A) is meant to protect people, particularly women, from social media abuse. But in reality, the new law would be used by the authorities and government against those who criticise them," the media quoted Kumaran as saying.

Leader of Indian National Congress, Ramesh Chennithala said that the amendment would reverse the course on media freedom, jeopardise free speech and civil liberties. He also said that the amendment grants more power to the police to register cases even in the absence of a specific complaint, including published and broadcast contents.

Also Read: Karnataka: School Premises Converted Into Farms As Pandemic Drives Teachers To Opt For Odd Jobs

Suggest a correction

    Help Us Correct

    To err is human, to help correct is humane
    Identified a factual or typographical error in this story? Kindly use this form to alert our editors
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Form Submitted Successfully
    Error in submitting form. Try again later

Contributors

Devyani Madaik

Devyani Madaik

Trainee Digital Journalist

A media enthusiast, Devyani believes in learning on the job and there is nothing off limits when it comes to work. Writing is her passion and she is always ready for a debate as well.

Rakshitha R

Rakshitha R

contributor

Rakshitha an engineer turned passionate journalist with an inclination for poetry, creative writing, movies, fiction, mountains and seclusion. Not a part of the social process but existential.

Abhishek M

Abhishek M

Creative Producer

" An engineer by profession, Abhishek is the creative producer of the team, graphic designing is his passion and travelling his get away. In more ways than one, he makes the content visually appealing."

Next Story