Sromona Bhattacharyya Bhattacharyya
Hailing from Kolkata and now a resident of Bengaluru, Sromona is a multimedia journalist who has a knack for digging stories that truly deserve attention.
In a landmark judgement, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court, on September 6, 2018, read down Section 377, which criminalised consensual same-sex relations as well as any sexual act other than heterosexual penile-vaginal sex. Supreme Court said that the right to love anyone was an individual choice. They further said that consensual sex between adults is not a crime.
Section 377 exists in Chapter XVI of the Indian Penal Code as:
“377. Unnatural offences: Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.
Explanation: Penetration is sufficient to constitute the carnal intercourse necessary to the offence described in this section.”
The much-awaited judgement is a reiteration of the 2009 Delhi High Court judgement which had also read down section 377 of the Indian Penal Code in a similar fashion, bringing tears of joy to the members of the LGBTQ+ community across the nation. However, India’s struggle with the now-read down archaic law goes back to decades. It took independent India 71 years to finally shake off one of its most controversial relics of the British-era legislation.
India was first introduced to today’s Section 377, almost 80 years before its independence in the year 1861. The law finds its roots in The Buggery Act of 1533, on the basis of which, Thomas Macaulay drafted the section in 1838, which was brought into effect in 1860. The Buggery Act was enacted under the reign of King Henry VIII where ‘buggery’ had been defined as an unnatural sexual act which goes against nature, God and man’s will, thereby, criminalises anal penetration, bestiality, and homosexuality at large.
In 1828, the Buggery Act was repealed and replaced by the Offences against the Person Act 1828 which broadened the definition of unnatural sexual acts and allowed for easier prosecution of rapists. In 1861, the British repealed and replaced the 1828 act by the Offences against the Person Act 1861.
Nearly a century later in 1967, homosexuality was decriminalised in Britain, which paved the way for other historic judgements pertaining to securing the rights of sexual minorities over the last 50 years. It is interesting to note that, a number of British colonies, including India, continued to follow an archaic law, penned in the 1830’s and enacted in the 1860’s well after their colonisers left the country.
Section 377’s legal battle first began in 1994 when AIDS Bhedbhav Virodhi Andolan (ABVA) filed a petition in the Delhi High Court which challenged the section’s constitutionality and also called for its repeal. Since ABVA failed to follow through with the petition, it later got dismissed.
In 2001, ABVA’s petition came in the much toned-down form of a petition filed by the NGO Naz Foundation. The case was dismissed in 2004 by a two-judge Delhi High Court Bench of Chief Justice BC Patel and Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed. A review petition too was dismissed. While the petition, which sought to decriminalise private homosexual activities did not yield any success at first, it was still the first instance where the constitutional validity of the law was challenged in a court of law.
However, as the LGBTQ+ movement gained momentum in different parts of the country, the Supreme Court in 2006 directed the Delhi High Court to hear the case once again. In a 2009 landmark judgement, a Division Bench of Chief Justice Ajit Prakash Shah and Justice S Muralidhar said, “We declare that Section 377 IPC, insofar as it criminalises consensual sexual acts of adults in private, is violative of Articles 21, 14 and 15 of the Constitution”. With that, sexual activities in private between two consenting adults, irrespective of their sexual orientation were no longer a criminal offence.
While this did bring joy to the members of the LGBTQ+ community, the verdict was soon challenged by Suresh Kumar Koushal and others in the Supreme Court in the same year.
A two-judge bench of Justices GS Singhvi and SJ Mukhopadhaya of the Supreme Court in its 2013 judgement against the Section 377, quashed the aspirations of many who have been through hell. The apex court while reinstating section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), had then struck down the 2009 Delhi High Court judgement, leaving the question of its constitutional validity upon the Parliament’s discretion. This resulted in mass outrage among members of the community as well as others.
Meanwhile, Congress MP Shashi Tharoor had introduced a Private Member’s Bill in the Parliament in 2015, which was in tune with the 2009 Delhi HC judgement. The bill voted down by the Parliament sought to decriminalise homosexuality, reported LiveMint then.
The apex court in 2016 referred a curative petition to a five-judge bench after the review petitions by Naz Foundation, the Union government, and others were quashed in 2014. India’s fight against Section 377 was set back on track by virtue of two landmark Supreme Court judgements in the year 2014 and 2017 respectively.
In 2014, a two-judge bench passed the famous NALSA(National Legal Services Authority) judgement by which the members of the transgender community were given the right to be called the third gender. This also gave transgender individuals to seek economic, political and legal rights. In the same year, a group of LGBTQ+ activists filed petitions against Section 377 which was then forwarded to a Consitution bench for hearing in 2016.
The Supreme Court’s landmark 2017 judgement on the right to privacy as a fundamental right propelled the fight against section 377 even further. The nine-judge Supreme Court bench ruled, “Privacy includes at its core the preservation of personal intimacies, the sanctity of family life, marriage, procreation, the home and sexual orientation. Privacy also connotes a right to be left alone.” This put the basis of Section 377, directly in conflict with the new judgement of privacy, renewing the hopes of many.
Four new petitions were filed before May 2018 on behalf of Arif Jaffer, who was incarcerated for 47 days under Section 377, Ashok Row Kavi, Keshav Suri and Anwesh Pokkuluri. Anwesh Pokkuluri, along with 19 others present and former students of IITs across the country, had also moved the Supreme Court in May seeking to challenge the constitutional validity of section 377. The petition has been filed on behalf of the 350 members of a pan-IIT LGBT group, Pravritti.
The petitioners claimed that section 377 violated certain fundamental rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. The articles are 14, 15, 19 and 21 which pertain to individual rights and liberty that every Indian citizen is entitled to.
On July 10, 2018, a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court began hearing the much-debated constitutional validity of Section 377 and finally, on September 6, 2018, India bid adieu to the 150-year old rule, thereby decriminalising homosexual activities between consenting adults.
When the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court in 2013 had reinstated Section 377, the court justified its verdict by saying, “The High Court overlooked that a minuscule fraction of the country’s population constitute lesbians, gays, bisexuals or transgenders and in last more than 150 years, less than 200 persons have been prosecuted for committing offence under Section 377,” reported LiveMint then.
However, the figure quoted was grossly understated because, until 2014, the data on the number of people prosecuted under section 377 was not in existence. It was only in 2014 that the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) began to report cases on Section 377 across India, reported Times Of India. NCRB’s 2015 data showed that a total of 1491 people had been arrested under Section 377. News reports of the police making arbitrary arrests on false charges under section 377 have also surfaced time and again, which puts the law and its implementation in question.
With the reading down of the law, India finally let go of over 150-years of British colonial legacy. While this is a big win for the members of the community, the fight has just begun since much needs to be done to secure the public and civil rights which they rightfully deserve.
Thank you for subscribing.
We have sent you a confirmation email.