In-Hand Salary Set To Increase, Government Proposes Cut In Provident Fund Contribution

Supported by

To increase in-hand salaries, the Labour & Employment Ministry has proposed a slash in worker’s contribution to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF). 

The worker’s eligibility to obtain the benefit would be decided based on their age, gender or pay grade while the employer’s share will remain unchanged.

This move comes in line with the government’s aim to reform labour laws and secure all classes of workers with social security, reduce the provident fund burden on employers and increase the take-home salary for employees.

To broaden social security, the Ministry has also proposed to introduce provident fund for self-employed workers such as domestic help and drivers, the Economic Times reported.

This move is in sync with the Pradhan Mantri Shram Yogi Maan Dhan pension scheme applicable for unorganised sector workers. A draft of the Amendment Bill dated August 23 has been circulated and will be open for comments up to September 22.

For this an amendment to the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF) and Miscellaneous Provident (MP) Act has been suggested, which would specify rates of contribution and the period for which such rates shall apply for any class of employees, ET added.

As per the EPF & MP Act, the EPF contribution is 24 per cent of the basic pay, divided equally between employers and employees. The EPF & MP Act is applicable to every establishment employing 20 or more people.

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) subscribers may be given the choice of switching between the provident fund and the National Pension Scheme and those with income below a certain threshold can opt not to contribute to PF without impacting the employers’ contribution.

“This flexibility will enable modification of rates of contribution depending on various factors like age, income, gender,” the labour ministry said in a brief note.

“To instil discipline in the working of assessing officers, the government has suggested two years for inspectors to conclude their inquiries, under this Act. Otherwise, inspectors will have to submit reasons in writing to the EPFO’s central provident fund commissioner,” the ministry added.

The proposal advises restricting the inspection of backdated records only up to five years. This is presently not time-bound and turns into a cause for harassment.


Also Read: TLI Explains: RBI’s Record Transfer Of Rs 1.76 Lakh Crore To Govt And Why Economists Are Worried

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Featured

Amplified by

Amazon Prime

For Two Nights in June, Mumbai’s Sea Link and Asiatic Library Wore Light Like They’ve Never Worn It Before

Amplified by

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

From Risky to Safe: Sadak Suraksha Abhiyan Makes India’s Roads Secure Nationwide

Recent Stories

Raymond Appoints Former BEL Chief As CEO, Signalling A Massive Bet On India’s Booming Defence Industry

Mumbai Chawl Collapse Kills Six, Including Five Children; Rescue Operation Continues

Why India’s Crackdown On Meta’s Child Abuse Ads Could Reshape Digital Platform Accountability

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :