The Intolerance Debate Is Flawed. Here’s Why

Sudhanva Shetty

November 27th, 2015 / 3:08 PM

Image Source: tehelka

For the past many weeks, there has been a major national debate on whether India is becoming an intolerant nation. The proponents of this argument cite two trends: one, the recent string of attacks on journalists and freethinkers; and two, the extremism of the anti-beef lobby. The opponents of the argument brand the proponents as anti-Government and politically biased.

Controversial statements by certain political leaders have added fuel to the fire. A growing number of celebrities and civil society activists have given their opinions on the topic. Also, many Sahitya Akademi awardees have returned their awards in protest – and others opposed the same in what has come to be known as ‘Award Wapsi’.

While approaching the issue of intolerance, it is important to note a few valid points with a broad mind:
• No country on earth can claim to be fully tolerant; all countries have friction between communities.
• India is not like any other country – we are a staggeringly diverse nation. As such, it is practically impossible to expect zero cases of communal violence in a nation as dynamic as India.
• We are a robust democracy, but still a young democracy.
• It is the right of every Indian to protest non-violently for anything, even if the cause is unnecessary; free speech is constitutionally guaranteed.

Understanding the aforementioned points, let us now try to accept two very important and hard truths:
• There are elements in Indian society which wish to inflict disorder and which are inherently intolerant.
• However, for a democracy of 1.26 billion people, a dozen religions, three thousand castes and countless ideological factions, India is relatively peaceful.

The debate on intolerance is both important and flawed: important because any debate that involves the country is worth having, and flawed because of the direction it has taken. Problems arise when people give it a religious dimension; India has communal elements, but they are fringe elements. The majority of Indians are not driven by religious divisions; our Constitution is highly liberal and so is our legal system. There are loopholes and imperfections, but ignoring the bigger picture would be unwise and agenda-driven. If India was a religiously intolerant country we would not have survived 70 years of being the most diverse democracy on earth.

In conclusion:
• India, like every country, has both tolerant and intolerant elements in it.
• India is not religiously intolerant. We are a diverse nation and we are largely proud of our diversity. A few violent fringe elements do not represent the rest of us.
• Opposing people who return their awards by asking them to “Go to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan,” is uneducated and stupid.
• The media has largely failed in giving people the full picture, leaving them to come to their own, half-informed conclusions.
• Anytime we have a national debate, it is important to approach it in as apolitical a manner as we can. Otherwise, we risk losing whatever we can accomplish by having the debate.


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

“India’s Nationhood Is Not One Language, One Religion”: Key Takeaways From Former President Pranab Mukherjee Speech At RSS Event

Everything Is Not About Narendra Modi vs. Rahul Gandhi vs. Arvind Kejriwal

Less Tolerance For Homosexuality In More Religious Countries

Opinion: Don’t Let Democracy To Be Robbed By The Rich, It Is Meant For The Poor

Does Large Voter Turn Out Mean Anything At All? Is Elections A Benchmark For A Country To Be Considered As A Democracy?

POLL: Should A Government Be Able To Decide On The Limits Of Free Speech In A Democracy?

Latest on The Logical Indian

Exclusive

The Institutes Of Eminence And The Jio Institute Furor: The Wrong Debate For India And Its Youth

Get Inspired

Paralysed At 18 To Becoming A Para-athlete At 30; Meet Haryana’s Ekta Bhyan Who Won Gold For India

News

People Accused Of Crimes By CBI Being Appointed As CBI Officers; Complains CBI To Vigilance Commission

TLI Explains

TLI Explains: Can Aligarh Muslim University Allow Reservation For SC/ST Students?

Awareness

3.5 Cr Elderly Poor Are Being Given Pension Of Mere Rs 200 For Last 12 Yrs

News

Chennai: 12-Yr-Old Raped By 22 Men For 7 Months In Apartment Complex; Girl Was Drugged & Filmed

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.