Neeta Ambani Is Not Wrong In Asking Security, But Is The Government Right In Providing Her The Same?

Al Arafat Sherfuddeen

July 27th, 2016 / 6:43 PM

neeta-ambani

Image Source: hindustantimes

VVIP’s like Mukesh Ambani and many others have been accorded high-end security in the past. Adding to the list is Ms Neeta Ambani who has been provided Y security by the central government. It is worth noting that security provided by the government is paid for by the private individuals, as is the case with Ms. Nita Ambani and Mr. Mukesh Ambani.

The issue technically should not be a fodder for any controversy. However, when put in perspective, it is only fair that critics have questioned the decision. Criticism about the issue originates from the following questions;

1. Even though the security services are paid for, is it wise to use NSG & police for private individuals at a time when there has been too many threats, violence and abuse against nationals especially against women?

2. How many personnel can the government afford to provide if more private individuals come asking for VIP security?
3. Is it not insensitive to provide high end (Z & Y) security for two persons from the same family, at a time when minimum security is not assured for majority of women in India?

Women security both by allocation of funds and as a matter of public discourse has taken a back seat. Despite the increasing reported violence against women, there is a sense of anxiety that security for citizens, especially women, is no more a thing to be asked for but can only be bought. The anxiety and anger that has emanated from the whole issue are based on the woeful track record India has with respect to providing a secure environment for its citizens rather than provision of paid security for the ultra rich.

The government should be more proactive in communicating and implementing innovative policies and initiatives to boost security for all its citizens, it should take people into confidence about the high priority the government ascribes to security of citizens. These measures, if taken earlier, could have toned down the criticism of this latest government decision. It is never too late for the government to hit the ground running in kick-starting a process, a movement, a policy discussion, a people’s participation in securing its citizens. Until it does this, such doling out of niche services to private individuals will back fire.


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Anil Ambani Ericsson

Ericsson Moves Court Asking To Prevent Anil Ambani From Leaving The Country Over Dues Of Rs 550 Crore

Rajendra Singh

I Wrote A Letter To PM Asking Why Ganga Has Not Been Cleaned, But No Reply, Says Waterman Rajendra Singh

Virat Kohli Times Now

Times Now’s Shaming Of Indian Cricketers In The Name Of Martyrs Is Not Only Wrong But Dangerous

Sunita Sancheti

Spine Injury Disabled Her But Not Her Dream To Travel The World

Yogeshwar Dutt Dowry

Yogeshwar Dutt Accepts Re 1 As ‘Token Dowry’ – Is He Right Or Is He Wrong?

[Watch/Read] Her Sister Told Her To Run, But They Held Her Down And Poured Acid On Her Face

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Election Result 2018: What Prominent Political Leaders Had To Say About It

News

Centre Denies Separate Minority Status To Lingayats, Says Scheduled Caste Benefits Would Be Lost

Awareness

An Island In Sunderban Is Disappearing Due To Rising Sea Water; Residents Left Without A Home

News

Pothole Menace: 22-Yr-Old Dies In Bengaluru Allegedly After Hitting Pothole, BBMP Blames Victim

News

After A Neck-To-Neck Fight, MP Finally Goes To Congress; Mayawati Extends Support, Shivraj Chouhan Resigns

News

J&K: To Set An Example Of Communal Harmony, This Hindu Majority Village Elected Muslim Man As ‘Panch’

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.