Tea Vendor Fights His Own Case And Wins It Against India’s Largest Bank

The Logical Indian

June 22nd, 2015

Source: Bhopalsamachar

At some point, we all have fallen prey to frauds by some company or the other. Yet most of us are too scared to file a case in the consumer forum, apprehending all the harassments and extra expenditures we might have to go through. Meet Rajesh Sakre, a commoner who didn’t have money to get a lawyer but had the courage and faith to stand up for his rights and bring the wrongdoer to justice.

Rajesh Sakre is a tea vendor, who faced injustice from the State Bank of India (SBI) in December 2011. This case was regarding a sum of Rs. 9,200/- that was debited from his account without his knowledge. Sakre raised a question against this to the bank, because he never withdrew this amount from his bank account.

According to Sakre, he had Rs. 20,000/- in his bank account on 23rd December 2011. He had withdrawn a sum of Rs. 10,800/- on the same day. When he returned to the bank two days later to withdraw more cash, he was shocked to see that his account showed zero balance. This meant that the remaining balance was missing from his account, due to negligence or some error committed by the bank. On his complaint, he was only blamed for negligence, and the officers at Hamidia Road Branch of the SBI took no responsibility for this matter.

After this, Sakre a resident of Shabri Nagar in Bhopal had sent a written complaint to the SBI, Mumbai Headquarter. It was when he didn’t receive any answer from the SBI that he moved to the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (DCDRF) with his complaint.

The consumer forum listened to his plea, but the bank kept on saying that Sakre had only withdrawn the cash from the bank. Though, the bank failed to produce any evidence for the same. In addition, it also failed to present CCTV footage after the consumer forum asked for it. It was a tough fight for Rajesh Sakre, who has studied only till 5th standard in school. He had to be present for the court’s hearing over a dozen of times, but he didn’t accept defeat and stood for what was the truth. He said, it was his right, how could he let it go?

Although, he didn’t have enough money to get a lawyer to fight his case, he kept on speaking for himself to the magistrate in the court. He maintained his stand, and it was his win when the DCDRF on June 16, directed the largest bank of India, the SBI- to return the sum of Rs. 9,200/- with a 6% rate of interest within 2 months. In addition, SBI shall pay him Rs. 10,000/- for mental distress that he faced during that time, with additional Rs. 2,000/- for fighting the legal matters.

The Logical Indian community applauds the positive spirit shown by Rajesh Sakre, who stood for what was right and didn’t lose his faith in himself.

 

 

Twitter-Banner

Share your thoughts

Realted Stories

Samsung Defective Television

Telangana: District Consumer Court Orders Customer To Pay Rs 10,000 To Samsung For Defective TV

bank

ICICI Bank To Refund Rs 2.7 Lakh After Fraudulent Withdrawal From Customer’s Account In 2006-07

bank

ICICI Bank To Refund Rs 2.7 Lakh After Fraudulent Withdrawal From Customer’s Account In 2006-07

Debit Card Transactions

Law Student Wins Fight Against Extra Charge Being Levied On Debit Card Transactions

You Can Open SBI Basic Savings Account To Avoid Penalty For Not Maintaining Minimum Balance

Mutual Fund

Mutual Fund: No Need To Worry About Any Penalty & Withdraw Money Anytime Anywhere

Latest on The Logical Indian

Legal

Private Bill For Marijuana Legalization In Parliament’s Winter Session

News

BSF Jawan, Punjab Police Personnel Deployed To Perform “Marriage Duty” At IG Daughter’s Wedding Venue

News

Punjab: 2 Farmer Brothers Commit Suicide Owing To Debt 10 Yrs After Their Father Had

News

Thousands Of Farmers Gather In Delhi For Freedom From Debt

My Social Responsibility

This Organisation Takes Over Under-performing Govt Schools And Improves Them With The Help Of NGOs

Awareness

For Selling Fridge Without Guarantee Card In Clearance Sale, LG Electronics And Dealer Directed By Consumer Court To Compensate