Every year, Indian companies approve thousands of crores in CSR budgets. Approval is the easy part. What happens in the months between a board signing off and a family actually holding something in their hands is where most of the value is either protected or quietly lost, and it is the part almost nobody is accountable for.
Shreya Mishra has spent a decade working inside exactly that space. Across ten years she has worked with more than 200 corporates and over 600 NGOs, in livelihoods, education, environment and disaster relief, and has been involved in raising more than ₹68 crore in CSR funding. She has sat on the corporate side of the table, where budgets are approved, compliance is tested and reporting is demanded, and she has stood on the delivery side, where those same decisions either work or fail without anyone noticing. Her conclusion after ten years is not about intent, and not about the size of the cheque.
“A company approves the money. A community needs the outcome. Between those two points sit procurement, compliance, documentation, delivery and reporting, and that is where most CSR value leaks away. I call it the messy middle. It is not a funding problem. It is a systems problem, which means it can be fixed.”
Standard operating procedures. Verified data from the field. Documentation that satisfies a legal team before anyone has to ask for it. Reporting that reaches a funder on a schedule rather than on request. Tools that carry the coordination instead of depending on someone to remember. That is the work Shreya now does for a living, and it is the thread running through everything she has built.
A Purpose That Started Early
Shreya’s interest in the social sector began while she was pursuing her graduation in Lucknow. She was involved with the National Service Scheme (NSS), where she worked with communities, understood their problems and looked for ways to address them. That work involved approaching local authorities, writing letters, collecting signed petitions from communities and pushing until their concerns were resolved. She was awarded a “best leader award” for her NSS work in 2014.
While her family encouraged her to pursue an MBA, CA or another conventional career path, Shreya had already developed a clear interest in working closely with underprivileged communities.
That interest led her to a Master of Social Entrepreneurship from Karnatak University. During the degree she visited government schools and organisations working on social issues, conducted case studies, and tried to understand how social organisations operated, how they received funding and how they used it.
Learning CSR From the Corporate Side
After completing her Master’s, Shreya joined a consulting firm, and it placed her on the side of the ecosystem most social sector professionals never see. Her work was with corporates and their CSR funds: how budgets were built, which causes were chosen and why, how implementation partners were assessed, and what a company expected in return for its money.
“I did not begin in fundraising. I began inside CSR itself, watching how a company decides. That is a completely different education. You stop asking how to get funding and start understanding what a corporate is actually trying to achieve, and what it is afraid of.”
That vantage point shaped everything afterwards. She could see which organisations received funding and why, and she could also see what happened to the same money once it reached the field.
She describes spending ten years moving between the two sides. Many professionals experience only one.
“I have sat in the room where the money is approved, and I have stood in the queue where it is handed over. Very few people in this sector have done both, and it changes what you think the problem is.”
Over those years she led a team of more than 35 people across programmes in livelihoods, education, environment and disaster relief, and built the accountability frameworks that team ran on.
Why Systems Decide Whether Funding Works
Across a decade, Shreya says the pattern that repeats has very little to do with how good an organisation’s work is.
“I have watched organisations doing genuinely important work stay exactly where they are for years, because nothing was built to hold it. No process. No documentation. No system. Passion starts an organisation. Systems are what allow it to survive its own growth.”
Her position is that an organisation of any size needs the same fundamentals: a clearly defined objective, a systematic approach to reaching it, documented processes that survive the departure of whoever designed them, and reporting a corporate funder can take to their own board without having to rebuild it first.
“Size is not the excuse people think it is. A two person organisation and a two hundred person organisation need the same three things. Know what you are trying to achieve. Write down how you do it. Be able to prove it happened.”
“Documentation is not paperwork. It is the only thing that outlives the person who did the work.”
The same logic applies to the funding side, where she argues the failure is almost never the pitch itself.
“Most fundraising does not fail at the pitch. It fails because there was no system behind the pitch.”
That means knowing which corporates fund your sector, when their budget cycles open, which organisations they already support, and whether your work genuinely fits their mandate, then holding all of it in a database and a CRM with follow up discipline, including with the companies that say no this year.
“A no in September is very often a yes in January, but only if somebody wrote down the conversation.”
The Compliance Work Nobody Talks About
Much of Shreya’s corporate work has involved working alongside legal and finance teams, where CSR funding decisions are actually processed. She has handled Fund Utilisation Certificates, audits, budgets, grant proposals, NGO onboarding, and SOPs to make compliance and approvals more structured and repeatable.
Her experience taught her that compliance is not simply an administrative requirement, it builds trust, reduces risk, and can influence whether a corporate continues its partnership. As she puts it, “Most people in fundraising treat compliance as the thing slowing them down. I learned to treat it as the thing that makes the next grant possible.”
Transparency By Design
The same thinking shaped tools Shreya helped build on the delivery side, in livelihoods and education programmes, aimed squarely at transparency.
The objective was to capture beneficiary and programme data as work happened rather than reconstruct it at the end of a financial year, to keep legal and grant compliance documented as it was generated, and to produce funder reporting on a fixed cycle instead of on request.
“Every corporate I have worked with carries the same quiet fear. They have released the money and they do not know what is happening to it. Chasing an implementation agency for an update is the most common complaint in this sector, so build the reporting into the programme and the question stops being asked.”
“That is what a corporate is actually buying. Not a promise. A system that will still be running in month eleven.”
For funders with statutory reporting obligations of their own, she says, this is no longer optional. Impact data has to arrive in a form that a board and an auditor will both accept, and that is a design decision taken at the start of a programme, not a document produced at the end of one.
Livelihoods, Education and Environment
While disaster relief is the work Shreya is most often asked about, much of her decade-long journey has focused on programmes designed for long-term impact. Her work spans livelihoods, farmer development, education, and environmental initiatives, from supporting women-led enterprises and rural farmers to improving learning opportunities for visually impaired children and leading large-scale plantation drives. She believes long-term programmes are harder to sustain because quick results are difficult to show. As she puts it, “Enthusiasm does not last three years. Process does.”
When Speed Becomes a System
Shreya’s disaster-relief work demonstrates how systems can turn speed into impact. Working with her team and corporate partners, she helped build a tool that verified and routed NGO relief requests, enabling responses within 48–72 hours and supporting families through rehabilitation. SOPs, pre-positioned inventory, verified information, and established government partnerships made this possible.
Her work involved coordination with NDRF, SDMAs, district administrations, and local officials during major emergencies. Over five years, the initiative reached 68,000 people and worked with 50+ corporates. In 2024, it was recognised as Best Disaster Initiative of the Year at the Global CSR & ESG Awards. “Speed is the impact, not the amount.’’
What Communities Actually Need
Working on the corporate side also showed Shreya how far a funder’s plan can drift from what is happening on the ground.
Some companies approach CSR knowing exactly what they want to support, whether that is rebuilding homes or helping people restart their livelihoods. Others arrive with a fixed idea of the relief they want to give, even when the need has already moved on.
She gives the example of companies wanting to supply ration more than a month after a disaster, when government support had already covered that requirement and families were asking for homes and livelihoods instead.
“A ration kit a month late is not relief. It is a photograph. My job is to tell a funder that before the money is spent, not after.”
Funding decisions, in her view, cannot be separated from an understanding of what a community needs and when it needs it. That is a conversation somebody has to be willing to have with a corporate partner early, even when it is not the easy conversation.
Helping Organisations Navigate CSR
Her work also exposed Shreya to a key gap in the sector: while large NGOs have dedicated fundraising teams and strong reporting systems, grassroots organisations often struggle to make their impact visible to funders. “It is almost never the quality of the work. It is that nobody outside can see it,” she says. Today, she works with NGOs and corporates to bridge this gap by strengthening processes, improving documentation, and building lasting CSR relationships. She emphasises essential compliance such as CSR Form 1, 80G, 12A, registration documents, Darpan ID where applicable, and three years of audited financial statements. As she puts it, “Compliance does not win you a grant, but missing compliance loses you one.”
A Demanding Role, Honestly Described
Shreya describes CSR fundraising as demanding work and believes anyone entering the field should understand its pressures. Her early experience taught her that effort alone is not enough; understanding the CSR ecosystem, its timelines, and how funding decisions work is essential. She also emphasises the importance of trust and long-term corporate relationships, noting that organisations often continue working with partners who already understand their processes and reporting requirements. As she puts it, “Renewal is cheaper than acquisition in this sector too.
A Decade Across Four Sectors
Across ten years Shreya has worked with more than 200 corporates, including Amazon, Titan, CGI, DMart, HDFC, BigBasket, Wellversed and Dynata among others, and with more than 600 NGOs.
She estimates that programmes she has supported have reached around 40 lakh beneficiaries, and she is deliberate about what that number does and does not claim.
“I will not say I created impact in the lives of 40 lakh people. They received a benefit from these programmes. In some of those lives I believe real change happened. That distinction matters, and our sector should be more honest about it.”
Her experience across CSR strategy, partnerships, compliance and implementation has shaped a straightforward belief: impact depends on understanding the funder and the community at the same time, and on building something durable enough to connect the two.
What It Takes to Work in the Social Sector
In her conversation with The Logical Indian, Shreya emphasised the importance of understanding whether one wants to work on the corporate or NGO side of the sector. She recommends beginning with consulting firms to gain exposure to implementation, impact reporting, community engagement, and corporate processes. Beyond technical skills, she believes passion is essential for sustaining work in the social sector.
Today, Shreya is building platforms and tools to make knowledge and resources more accessible to nonprofits, individuals, and corporates. Her journey has taken her from community engagement and social entrepreneurship to corporate CSR and grassroots work, ultimately leading her to address the gap between funding and meaningful impact. “I stopped waiting for somebody else to fix the messy middle. Now I build the systems that close it.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
CSR funding is usually discussed through numbers, announcements and the size of a company’s contribution. Shreya Mishra’s experience points to a less visible part of the conversation, which is everything that happens after the funding decision is made.
Her work suggests the difference between funding and impact is rarely goodwill. It is process: standard operating procedures, verified data, compliance documented as it is generated, reporting built into delivery rather than added afterwards, and tools that make all of it repeatable.
It raises a question for the sector. Are we measuring impact by how much money is given, or by how effectively and how quickly it reaches the people who need it?
And for corporates, NGOs and fundraisers alike, what would it actually take to build the systems that make the space between funding and impact less of a messy middle?
If you’d like us to feature your story, please write to us at csr@5w1h.media.
