AI Generated

Ahmedabad: 75-Year-Old Retired Professor Allegedly Loses ₹54.6 Lakh In ‘Digital Arrest’ Scam

Fraudsters posing as TRAI and CBI officials allegedly threatened her with criminal cases and demanded money.

Supported by

A 75-year-old retired woman professor from Ghuma, Ahmedabad, allegedly lost ₹54.60 lakh after cyber fraudsters posing as Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) officials kept her under a so-called “digital arrest” for 19 days.

According to media reports, the fraud began on August 3, when callers accused her of having links to obscene content and later a money-laundering case involving Jet Airways founder Naresh Goyal. The scammers allegedly kept her on daily phone and video calls, warned her not to tell her family, obtained details of her finances and compelled her to redeem mutual funds.

She allegedly transferred ₹33 lakh under the pretext of verifying digital currency, followed by additional payments after threats of imprisonment, taking the total loss to ₹54.60 lakh. The fraud came to light after the callers stopped responding and WhatsApp data on her phone was deleted. She then approached the cyber helpline, following which Bopal police registered an FIR and launched an investigation.

A Scam Built On Fear

The alleged fraud relied on impersonation and fear of legal action. The woman was first contacted by people claiming to be TRAI officials, who allegedly told her that a SIM card linked to her Aadhaar had been used to send obscene content.

The callers later escalated the accusation by claiming that her number was connected to the Naresh Goyal money-laundering case and allegedly made her prepare affidavits as part of the supposed investigation. Police told media that the fraudsters kept her engaged through phone and video calls every day and warned her against informing family members.

The prolonged nature of the alleged scam appears to have helped the fraudsters maintain control over the victim. Rather than making one immediate demand, they reportedly created the impression that she was being monitored as part of a serious criminal investigation.

Her financial information was allegedly extracted during this period, after which she was compelled to redeem mutual funds. She reportedly transferred ₹33 lakh for what the callers described as digital-currency verification, while further payments were allegedly made after threats of imprisonment. The total amount allegedly taken was ₹54.60 lakh.

TRAI has previously warned that criminals misuse its name to threaten people with SIM-related action, digital arrest and other false allegations. In an official advisory, the regulator said it does not conduct investigations or collect payments through phone calls, messaging applications or video platforms.

Digital Arrests Are Escalating

The Ahmedabad case comes amid a wider pattern of digital-arrest scams targeting senior citizens across Gujarat. An Indian Express report published this month said Gujarat Cyber Police had recorded 531 such cases in 2026, with victims, most of them aged over 60 and retired, losing more than ₹37 crore. The report also noted that fraudsters have repeatedly used the name of Naresh Goyal to make their false investigations appear credible.

In July, Gujarat police prevented another alleged digital-arrest fraud involving a 75-year-old couple in Sabarkantha. Fraudsters posing as Mumbai Police officers allegedly kept the couple on video calls for three days and accused the husband’s Aadhaar-linked SIM of being involved in a financial fraud connected to Naresh Goyal.

They allegedly instructed the couple to melt 25 tolas of gold and break a fixed deposit to arrange money. A bank employee became suspicious and alerted cyber police, preventing the couple from handing over their savings and gold.

The Union government has repeatedly warned that there is no such legal process as a “digital arrest”. The Ministry of Home Affairs and Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) have said fraudsters impersonate police, CBI, RBI and other agencies, use fake documents and keep victims on video calls while threatening arrest or other legal action. The government has urged people receiving such calls to report them immediately through the 1930 cybercrime helpline or the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal.

At a June 2026 NHRC discussion on digital-arrest scams, I4C Inspector General of Police Roopa M. highlighted the cybercrime.gov.in portal, helpline 1930 and the Citizen Financial Cyber Fraud Reporting and Management System for tracing, holding and restoring funds. NHRC officials also stressed the need for a victim-centric approach rather than blaming people who fall for such scams.

Stay Calm, Verify First

Cybersecurity experts advise people to treat unexpected calls claiming to be from government agencies with extreme caution, particularly when the caller threatens arrest, financial investigation or immediate legal action. Genuine authorities do not conduct arrests through video calls or demand that individuals transfer money for “verification”, “security checks”, “bail” or to prove that their bank accounts are legitimate.

Experts recommend ending such calls immediately and independently contacting the concerned department through its official website or verified helpline instead of using contact details provided by the caller. They also advise people not to share Aadhaar details, banking information, OTPs, passwords, card details or screen access with unknown callers.

If a person feels pressured or confused, involving a trusted family member or friend can help break the isolation that scammers deliberately create. In cases where money has already been transferred, reporting the fraud immediately through 1930 and the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal can improve the chances of stopping or recovering the funds.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

The Ahmedabad case is a stark reminder that cyber fraud is not only a technological problem but also a human one. The alleged scammers did not simply target a bank account; they exploited fear, trust and the authority associated with government institutions.

The fact that an educated, retired professional could allegedly be kept under this pressure for 19 days shows why victims should be met with empathy rather than judgement. Families, banks, regulators and law-enforcement agencies all have a role in creating an environment where a person feels safe enough to question a threatening caller and seek help.

Also read: Nepal Hit by 5.2-Magnitude Seismic Event as Glacial Collapse Triggers Devastating Flash Floods

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Featured

Amplified by

Amazon Prime

For Two Nights in June, Mumbai’s Sea Link and Asiatic Library Wore Light Like They’ve Never Worn It Before

Amplified by

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

From Risky to Safe: Sadak Suraksha Abhiyan Makes India’s Roads Secure Nationwide

Recent Stories

Nepal Floods: 288 Indians Uncontactable and 21 Rescued, Says Ministry of External Affairs

US Pauses Immigrant Visa Appointments Worldwide Amid Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

Goa FDA Flags Serious Lapses, Halts Operations at 3 Government Canteens

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :