Citizens Do Not Have An Absolute Right Over Their Bodies: Govt To Supreme Court

The Logical Indian Crew

May 3rd, 2017

Supreme Court Aadhaar Card

Courtesy: SFLCin | Image Courtesy: nytimes | aqusagtechnologi | ibtimes

On 26 April 2017, cases for linking Aadhaar to PAN and making it mandatory for filing Income Tax (IT) returns were heard before the bench of Justice A K Sikri and Justice Alok Bhushan in the Supreme Court.

Senior counsels Arvind Datar and Shyam Divan were representing the petitioners in these cases, Binoy Viswam v. Union of India (W.P.(C)247/2017), S.G. Vombatkere & Anr. v. Union of India (W.P.(C) 277/2017) respectively, while the Union of India was represented by the Attorney General, Mukul Rohatgi.

The session began as the Court heard arguments against the insertion of Section 139AA to the Income Tax Act, 1961 which makes Aadhaar mandatory for filing IT returns from 1 july 2017.

The privacy issues with Aadhaar – data leaks of millions of citizens, and the violation of an individual’s right over their body were also pointed out by the petitioners’ lawyers.






Blanket stay on Section 139AA, restrain from coercive action to link Aadhaar to PAN, and retrain from making PAN invalid were the demands of the petitioners.



On Tuesday, AG Mukul Rohatgi began his arguments and pointed out that Income Tax by its very nature is coercive, but it provides amenities to people. So there is no question of it being in violation of Article 19. Further, he said that Article 21 cannot be invoked merely on the question of taxation. The Parliament is the sole authority to decide the rules of taxation.



To argue against bodily intrusion, he said that citizens do not have an absolute right over their body. “The concept of absolute right over one’s body was a myth and there were various laws which put restrictions on such a right.”






The AG further quoted Rousseau and the social contract theory, and said that the State is like a corporation and the citizens are its members. To avail benefits from the State, we need to comply with the rules and regulations made by it.



The government also made the argument that documents similar to Aadhaar have already been functioning in many countries. US’ social security number was used as an example.


Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Right To Privacy

The Young Lawyers Behind India’s Right To Privacy Fight

Privacy Is A Fundamental Right Under The Indian Constitution: Supreme Court

Four States Move Supreme Court In Support Of Right To Privacy Being Made A Fundamental Right

aadhaar, section 139AA

Those Without Aadhaar Need Not Link It To Their PAN To File IT Returns: Supreme Court

FroLink Your Aadhaar Number To Your PAN

From 1 July, It Is Mandatory To Link Your Aadhaar Number To Your PAN; Here’s How You Can Do It Online

After Silencing Her Opinion, Trolls Abuse Sakshi Rawat For Raising Concern On Aadhaar’s Privacy Breach

Latest on The Logical Indian

Get Inspired

Karnataka Auto Driver Turns His Auto Into An Ambulance At Night, Gives Free Rides To The Needy

News

Bengaluru: Shia Muslim Group Attacked India Today’s Office Over Aaj Tak TV Anchor Rohit Sardana’s Comment

News

President Gives Nod To New Amendment Of Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code

News

Lucknow: Medical College Directed By SC To Pay Rs. 10 Lakh To Students Who Were Illegally Admitted

News

Nitin Gadkari’s Private Secretary’s Firm Received Govt Aid In Violation Of Civil Services Rule

Awareness

Google Can Track Android Users Even As Their Location Services Are Turned Off: Quartz Report