Step Out In Burqa To See What People Think Of Judiciary: Bar To SC Judges

The Logical Indian

June 24th, 2015

“My Lords should wear a burqa and roam in the court corridors to hear the way lawyers talk about the judges of this court. You will get first-hand account of the rotting justice delivery system. The kind of lawyers who are being appointed as judges is a disgrace.”

These are the words said by senior advocate Dushyant Dave, arguing for the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), to a Constitution Bench led by Justice J S Khehar. He was arguing in favour of the National Judicial Appointments Commission.

Dave, who is also the president of the SCBA, said the top court has used the Collegium’s power to appoint judges as a “giant”, and has turned its duty to protect human rights into a “sham”.

“Be it the 1984 anti-Sikh riots or the 2002 Gujarat riots, none of these cases have rendered justice. It is a shame how every court is going an extra mile to protect politicians and film stars, and ordinary citizens are deprived of justice,” said Dave.

“Acting chief justice of a high court decides to sit in a single bench, gets the roster for criminal cases, has the case transferred to his bench from another bench and quashes the FIR only because the person involved happens to be a top film star. Which driver gets bail within hours of conviction unless he happens to be a top film star? Which person will get bail by this court on the first day of the bail plea and without a notice to the other side if it is not a big politician? It is a shame,” he added.

Dave also claimed that while every accused in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case and the Gujarat riots case, including life term convict Maya Kodnani, had got bail from the apex court, surprisingly enough, Teesta Setalvad, who fought for the riot victims, had to run from pillar to post for protection from arrest.

The bench, also comprising Justices J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh K Goel, retorted that it was not the system, but some individuals who may have been in the wrong.
To which Dave replied, “The institution does not have a system to correct it. I am very sorry to say it but you don’t listen to anyone, my lord… You don’t entertain even the smallest of suggestions.”

Source Indian Express

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Constitutional Bench

SC Sets Up 5-Judge Constitution Bench To Hear On 7 Crucial Cases: Aadhaar, Section 377; Four ‘Rebel’ Judges Excluded

Matter Is Now Resolved: Says Bar Council Chaiman On The Press Con Held By 4 Supreme Court Judges

Justice Chelameswar

Know About Justice Chelameswar, Who Appealed To The Nation Today To Save The Judiciary

Justice Loya

Supreme Court Terms Justice Loya’s Death “Serious Matter”, Asks Maharashtra Govt To Submit Autopsy Report

Supreme Court

1st Time In History: 4 Supreme Court Judges Question The Way The Top Court Is Functioning

Bribery

Medical Colleges Admission Scam: SC Dismisses Plea Seeking SIT Inquiry, Imposes Fine Of Rs 25 Lakhs On Petitioner

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

3 Men Attacked By Mob For Refusing “Virginity Test” On Brides

News

Kerala: Deplorable Elephant Parade Again, Police Allegedly Keep Mum

My Story

MyStory : “I Just Taught Them A Subject, But They Taught Me Many Inspirational Lessons Through Their Life”

News

Kolkata: Scooter Rider Beaten To Death By Civic Police Volunteers For Not Wearing Helmet

News

With 11 Journalists Killed In 2017, India Goes Further Down On International Press Freedom Ranking

News

Not Just Sreejith, This Man From Kerala Has Also Been Protesting Over A Year For His Daughter’s Death