Step Out In Burqa To See What People Think Of Judiciary: Bar To SC Judges

The Logical Indian

June 24th, 2015 / 3:39 PM

“My Lords should wear a burqa and roam in the court corridors to hear the way lawyers talk about the judges of this court. You will get first-hand account of the rotting justice delivery system. The kind of lawyers who are being appointed as judges is a disgrace.”

These are the words said by senior advocate Dushyant Dave, arguing for the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), to a Constitution Bench led by Justice J S Khehar. He was arguing in favour of the National Judicial Appointments Commission.

Dave, who is also the president of the SCBA, said the top court has used the Collegium’s power to appoint judges as a “giant”, and has turned its duty to protect human rights into a “sham”.

“Be it the 1984 anti-Sikh riots or the 2002 Gujarat riots, none of these cases have rendered justice. It is a shame how every court is going an extra mile to protect politicians and film stars, and ordinary citizens are deprived of justice,” said Dave.

“Acting chief justice of a high court decides to sit in a single bench, gets the roster for criminal cases, has the case transferred to his bench from another bench and quashes the FIR only because the person involved happens to be a top film star. Which driver gets bail within hours of conviction unless he happens to be a top film star? Which person will get bail by this court on the first day of the bail plea and without a notice to the other side if it is not a big politician? It is a shame,” he added.

Dave also claimed that while every accused in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case and the Gujarat riots case, including life term convict Maya Kodnani, had got bail from the apex court, surprisingly enough, Teesta Setalvad, who fought for the riot victims, had to run from pillar to post for protection from arrest.

The bench, also comprising Justices J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh K Goel, retorted that it was not the system, but some individuals who may have been in the wrong.
To which Dave replied, “The institution does not have a system to correct it. I am very sorry to say it but you don’t listen to anyone, my lord… You don’t entertain even the smallest of suggestions.”

Source Indian Express


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

The Three Judges Cases: How Three Judgments Made The Modern Indian Judiciary

Denmark Passes Law To Ban Burqa & Naqab In Public Places, Becomes 5th European Country To Do So

Matter Is Now Resolved: Says Bar Council Chaiman On The Press Con Held By 4 Supreme Court Judges

Delhi HC Judges Conduct Inspections At District Level Courts To Find Judiciary Officials Coming Late

My Story: They Think We Are Dangerous, They Think We Are Threats; But We Just Want To Be Loved & Accepted

Uphaar Cinema Tragedy

A Mother’s Pain To See The People Responsible For Her Children’s Death Walk Free After 20 Years Of Fight

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

#Metoo: Anti-Rape Crusader In The Kathua Case, Talib Hussain, Accused Of Raping Multiple Women

Awareness

Rs 11,000 Cr Loan Sanctioned Under PM Modi’s Flagship MUDRA Scheme Turns Into Bad Loan

News

Amritsar Tragedy: Woman Saves 10-Month-Old Baby Flung Into Air Moments Before The Train Hit His Father

Get Inspired

Pune: 14-Yr-Old Girl Puts School Peon Behind Bars Who Molested And Forced Girls To Watch Porn

Awareness

How Recycling Waste Flowers Gave These Dalit Women Dignity Of Labour

News

One More Labourer Loses His Life While Cleaning Sewer In Delhi

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.