Step Out In Burqa To See What People Think Of Judiciary: Bar To SC Judges

The Logical Indian

June 24th, 2015 / 3:39 PM

“My Lords should wear a burqa and roam in the court corridors to hear the way lawyers talk about the judges of this court. You will get first-hand account of the rotting justice delivery system. The kind of lawyers who are being appointed as judges is a disgrace.”

These are the words said by senior advocate Dushyant Dave, arguing for the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), to a Constitution Bench led by Justice J S Khehar. He was arguing in favour of the National Judicial Appointments Commission.

Dave, who is also the president of the SCBA, said the top court has used the Collegium’s power to appoint judges as a “giant”, and has turned its duty to protect human rights into a “sham”.

“Be it the 1984 anti-Sikh riots or the 2002 Gujarat riots, none of these cases have rendered justice. It is a shame how every court is going an extra mile to protect politicians and film stars, and ordinary citizens are deprived of justice,” said Dave.

“Acting chief justice of a high court decides to sit in a single bench, gets the roster for criminal cases, has the case transferred to his bench from another bench and quashes the FIR only because the person involved happens to be a top film star. Which driver gets bail within hours of conviction unless he happens to be a top film star? Which person will get bail by this court on the first day of the bail plea and without a notice to the other side if it is not a big politician? It is a shame,” he added.

Dave also claimed that while every accused in the Sohrabuddin Sheikh fake encounter case and the Gujarat riots case, including life term convict Maya Kodnani, had got bail from the apex court, surprisingly enough, Teesta Setalvad, who fought for the riot victims, had to run from pillar to post for protection from arrest.

The bench, also comprising Justices J Chelameswar, Madan B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh K Goel, retorted that it was not the system, but some individuals who may have been in the wrong.
To which Dave replied, “The institution does not have a system to correct it. I am very sorry to say it but you don’t listen to anyone, my lord… You don’t entertain even the smallest of suggestions.”

Source Indian Express


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Related Stories

The Three Judges Cases: How Three Judgments Made The Modern Indian Judiciary

Denmark Passes Law To Ban Burqa & Naqab In Public Places, Becomes 5th European Country To Do So

Mumbai’s Kamala Mill Fire: Toilet Of The Restro-Bar Razed To Destroy Evidence

Lawyer Fighting Kathua Rape Victim’s Case Threatened By Bar Association; Asked To “Stop Spreading Filth”

Matter Is Now Resolved: Says Bar Council Chaiman On The Press Con Held By 4 Supreme Court Judges

Unauthorized Fitting Of Crash Guard & Bull Bar On Motor Vehicles Will Attract Penalty. Read To Know

Latest on The Logical Indian

Fact Check

Fact Check: No, The Child In The Viral Picture Did Not Die In Bihar Floods

News

Another Starvation Death In Jharkhand, 40-Yr-Old Man Dies After Starving For Over 10 Days

News

Detailing Pro-Khalistan Activities, India Submits 23-Page Dossier To Pakistan

News

Cabinet Clears Bill To Replace The 63-Year-Old Medical Council Of India

News

UP: BJP MLA Enters School, Enrolls Students As Party Members

News

Rs 400 Cr ‘Benami Plot’ Belonging To Mayawati’s Brother Seized By Income Tax Dept

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.