“No Occasion To Doubt The Decision-Making”: SC Dismisses All Petitions Demanding Probe Into Rafale Deal

The Logical Indian Crew India

December 14th, 2018 / 12:29 PM

SC Dismisses Petition Rafale Deal

Image Credit: The Indian Express

Dismissing petitions demanding the investigation into the Rafale deal, the Supreme Court on December 14 said that “there is no occasion to doubt the decision-making” in the controversial deal.

The Bench comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice KM Joseph dismissed all petitions against the deal. The court said that it was a “hard fact” that the new 36-jet-deal was negotiated after the earlier proposed 126 jets deal could not go ahead.


“No material to show it is commercial favouritism”

The apex court said, “ We cannot go into the wisdom of why the deal for 36 Rafale jets was made and not the original 126 aircraft. We cannot ask the government to go for 126 aircraft,” according to The Tribune.

On the issue of offset partner, the bench said that it did not find any material to show that it was a case of commercial favouritism. The court also added that the decision to award the offset to Anil Ambani-owned Reliance group was that of the Centre and vendor.



One of the main issues raised by the petitioners in the Rafale deal was that of the pricing. CJI Ranjan Gogoi said that it was not the job of the court to compare the pricing details of the deal.

As reported by The Tribune, this was also the first time when four senior IAF officers, including three Air Marshalls and an Air Vice Marshall along with the Additional Secretary (Defence), appeared before SC to discuss the aspects of the deal. The officers were asked questions about earlier acquisitions and the generation of aircraft which IAF was presently using. The Bench said, “Our country can’t remain unprepared when adversaries have acquired 4th & 5th generation fighter jets compared to none by India. We have interacted with senior Indian Air Force officers and there is no doubt about the need and quality of Rafale jets.”


“Very disappointing”: Prashant Bhushan

Multiple petitions in this deal were filed by lawyer Manohar Lal Sharma, AAP legislator Sanjay Singh and the trio of Yashwant Sinha, Arun Shourie and Prashant Bhushan.

One of the petitioners and eminent lawyer Prashant Bhushan in a series of tweet said that the Supreme Court’s judgment saying that there was no need for the court to order investigation was “very disappointing”.



Also Read: “No Guarantee From France On Rafale But A Letter Of Comfort Issued”: Govt To Supreme Court


Contributors

Written by : Shraddha Goled

Edited by : Bharat Nayak

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Case Against Modi Soldier Freezing

Fact Check: Case Against PM Modi Over Rafale Deal To ‘Indian Soldier’ Freezing In Cold

Rafale Deal Verdict

Govt Says There Was A Typo When They Cited CAG Report In Supreme Court On Rafale Deal

French NGO Rafale

French ‘Anti-Corruption’ NGO Registers Complaint To Probe Corruption In Rafale Deal

Reliance Sues NDTV

Anil Ambani’s Reliance Sues NDTV For 10,000 Cr Over Show On Rafale Deal

Supreme Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Independent Probe Into Justice Loya’s Death

Kerala Man's Protest

Lonely Battle Of Kerala Man, Demanding Justice For His Brother Turns Into Mass Protest, Campaign Becomes Viral

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Tamil Nadu: Over 70 injured In First Three Days Of Jallikattu Festival

News

Height Of Taboo: In Uttarakhand, Menstruating Women Were Kept Confined In Govt-Funded Building

Sponsored

Your Ratings In The Social World Might Have A Purpose Behind It

Exclusive

UPSC Protests Gain Momentum: Aspirants Demand Compensatory Attempt Due To Change In Exam Pattern

News

Prayagraj Kumbh Mela 2019: The Costliest At An Expense Of Rs 4,236 Crore

Awareness

Of Counsel: Not A Gossip-Laden Story Of Modi-Jaitely Politics, But A Retrospective On Their Economic Policies

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.