“Why No Action Against Politicians Whose Assets Rose By 500%? Is This The Attitude Of Indian Govt?” SC To Centre

The Logical Indian Crew

September 7th, 2017

Courtesy: Hindustan Times |  Image Credits: Livemint

Acting on a public interest litigation (PIL), the Supreme Court on Wednesday, September 6, took the centre to task for not disclosing action taken against politicians whose assets have jumped manifold between two elections.

The apex court has given the centre seven days’ time to submit the necessary information before it.

The PIL was filed filed by Lucknow-based NGO Lok Prahari, that wants amendment in election law to make it necessary for a candidate to disclose his and his family’s sources of income at the time of filing nomination form, Hindustan Times reported.

The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is tasked action against politicians whose assets have seen an enormous jump, in some cases by as high as 500%, after their elections. The government’s counsel failed to provide data on how many enquiries the CBDT initiated action against.

The advocate representing the centre said the government was “serious” about its intention to clean the system.

“All stakeholders need to be taken on board. Data needs to be elicited before we can suggest the changes,” he said. The advocate cited the Centre’s flagship project – Swachh Bharat (Abhiyan) – and said “It is not about cleaning of garbage only.”

The bench, however, was not convinced. It retorted: “This affidavit is not worth the piece of paper it’s written on … You are not averse to electoral reforms but have not placed any necessary details. Is this the attitude of the government of India? What have you done till now?”

The Supreme Court accused the centre of trying to get away with vague statements. “You better file a detailed affidavit. This affidavit which you have filed is nothing but typed papers. Do not make vague statements. If the CBDT has taken some action, please disclose what action has been taken,” the bench said, giving liberty to the government to furnish the data in a sealed cover … Give reasons if you do not want the information to be made public.”

Share your thoughts..

Propelled by

VOLVO

Make Your City Safe

Related Stories

Supreme Court Aadhar Mobile

Govt Accepts Supreme Court Never Made Linking Aadhaar to Mobile Compulsory

Taxpayers Who Show Less Income Or “Inflating” Deductions Would Be Prosecuted: IT Dept Warns Taxpayers

Sealing Drives In Delhi: SC Lashes Out At Centre For Breakdown Of Law & Order Due To Strikes

Candidates Contesting Elections Along With Their Assets Should Declare Dependents & Spouses Sources Of Income: SC

Assets And Income Of 98 MLAs & 7 MPs Under Scrutiny Of CBDT For Unexpected Rise

Will Jail Environment Secretary If Govt Fails To Preserve Country’s Wetlands: Supreme Court

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Ministry of I&B To Set Up Social Media Monitors in 716 Indian Districts

News

CBI Grills Sify Technologies Staff in SSC Paper Leak Case

Get Inspired

Residents Contribute Money To Make Road On Their Own In Village Due To Administration Apathy

News

No Salary For Last Five Months, Bengaluru Sanitary Workers Struggle To Survive

Environment

The Water Crisis In Punjab: Illegal Industrial Discharge Destroying Rivers, Threatening Human Lives

News

Caught On Camera Asking Money To Peddle Hindutva; Cobrapost Exposes The Newspapers You Read