Meat Ban Cannot be Shoved Down Someone’s Throat: Supreme Court

The Logical Indian

September 17th, 2015 / 5:58 PM

Image Source: Rediff

In the past few days we have all been witness to the controversy generated by meat ban in Maharashtra. For those who do not know, it was done keeping in mind the Jain festival of Parsyushana, which is celebrated for 8 (Swetambara Jains) or 10 (Digambara Jains) days in the month of August or September.

The ban on meat during the festival has been since 2004, but it has not been implemented consistently as far as the ban on sale is concerned. This year, however, the Maharashtra government imposed a ban on meat, triggering protests in Maharashtra as well as debates in the entire country. The ban was reduced to two days following the public outrage. The matter went to Bombay High Court which put a stay on the government order banning sale of meat and slaughter in Mumbai.

The Jain community made a plea to the Supreme Court, which gave its verdict today. The petition was filed by Shree Tapagarhiya Atma Kamal Labdhisuriswarji Gyanmandir Trust against the Bombay Mutton Dealers Association challenging the HC stay on a September 2004 notification for closing down of abattoirs in Mumbai. The Jain Trust argued that a ban on meat for 15-20 days can only be conceived as compassion for animals. Even animals have right to live under Article 21 of the Constitution, advocate Abhishek Singhvi argued. It is a practice of the principle of ahimsa.

The Supreme Court Bench of Justices T.S Thakur and Kurian Joseph said that “compassion is not something that should be reserved only for festival periods”. The former even quoted the famous poet Kabir – “’why do you peek into the homes of those who use meat, let them do what they do, but why are you so bothered about them, brother’. This means that there should be tolerance for the practices of other communities, too. Moreover, ahimsa cannot be practiced through meat ban. It can be inculcated in other ways. He said such calls for meat bans from governments are fodder for “elements who want to use it as a reason for conflict”.

Moreover, people who depend on meat products for their living would find it difficult to handle the ban. “Butchery is happening across the country, all over the world, even if you agree or not to it. Please inculcate the spirit of tolerance within”.

To put it in a nutshell, the Supreme Court said, “meat ban cannot be shoved down someone’s throat”.

The Trust has been allowed to withdraw its petition and given the liberty to approach the Bombay High Court for an early resolution of the issue.

It is true indeed that trying to regulate food choices of citizens is not a good idea. An appeal could have been made to shut down the slaughter houses and shops, leaving it to the public to decide what they want to eat based on their religious or personal choices.


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

SCST Quota Supreme Court

Cannot Claim SC/ST Benefits In Second State Unless Caste Notified There: Supreme Court

Assam NRC

Centre Cannot Take Action Against 40 Lakh People Left Out Of The NRC List: Supreme Court

Kolkata: Meat Of Rotting Dogs, Cats Sold In Markets & Restaurants; Trigger Sharp Fall In Meat Sale

Monsanto Cannot Patent BT Cotton Seeds In India, Says Supreme Court

Brother Cannot Claim Property Inherited By Sister

Brother Cannot Claim The Property Inherited By His Sister From Her In-Laws: Supreme Court

UP: “I Requested The Cops To Help The Woman But They Poured Liquor Down My Throat,” Said Journalist

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

In Last 4 Years, No Of ‘Crorepati’ Taxpayers Increased By Over 60%: IT Dept

News

“How Much Black Money Brought Back From Abroad & Deposited In Account Of Indian Citizens,” CIC To PMO

News

Kerala Nun Rape: Father Who Testified Against Bishop Franco Found Dead

News

Army Acquired Their Land In 1962, Arunachal Villagers Get 38 Crore Compensation After 56 Years

News

Guitar Lessons At Re 1 Per Day: Meet Engineer Turned Guitar Teacher Who Is Spreading The Joy Of Music

Fact Check

PM Modi Claims UPA Only Built 25 Lakh Houses During Their Last Four Years, Is It True?

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.