Supreme Court Collegium Under Question After Madras HC Chief Justice VK Tahilramani Resigns Over Transfer

The Logical Indian Crew India

September 11th, 2019 / 5:58 PM

Madras HC Vijaya Tahilramani

Image Credits: India Today

The due process of High Court judges transfer by the Supreme Court collegium is once again under question after the resignation as Madras High Court Chief Justice Vijaya K Tahilramani.

The chief justice submitted her resignation on Friday in the wake of Supreme Court collegium’s August 28 decision to transfer her to Meghalaya High Court. The apex court had earlier refused her request to reconsider her transfer and said that the collegium had made the recommendation in the “interest of better administration of justice.”

Tahilramani served as a judge in Bombay High Court for 17 years and has been its acting chief justice. She is the senior-most among the High Court judges currently holding office. She was transferred to the prestigious 75 judges Madras High Court on August 2018. Her tenure at the Madras High Court has so far been smooth. Thus it becomes even more intriguing to know why she was transferred to three-judge Meghalaya High court.

How Are High Court Judges Transferred?

A judicial transfer is generally made by Presidential orders with the advice of the Chief Justice of India. The CJI can only advise such transfers after the resolution of the collegium. The collegium may also take opinion from the Supreme Court Judge hailing from the concerned High Court from which the judge is being transferred or the chief justice of that High Court.

According to a report in The Print, the collegium headed by CJI Dipak Mishra in January 2018 refused Justice Ajay Kumar Mittal’s claims for appointment as the chief justice of the Himachal Pradesh High Court. The collegium cited a 14-year-old intelligence bureau report and his “poor performance” as a judge to overlook the Punjab and Haryana High Court as reasons to counter his claims.

The members of the same collegium including the current CJI Ranjan Gogoi had cleared Justice Mittal’s name in June 2017 for the appointment as the Chief Justice of Delhi HC. The whole process was kept opaque and no one was informed.

The consultation process has been criticised over the years for becoming erratic. The case of Justice Tahilramani is a classic case where a High Court chief justice is transferred without any public knowledge on why the transfer was made.

Also Read: Clean Chit To CJI Ranjan Gogoi In Sexual Harassment Case; Complainant Says She Is “Dejected And Terrified”


Written by : Shubhendu Deshmukh

Edited by : Shweta Kothari

Related Stories

In The Name Of Transparency, We Can’t Destroy Judiciary: SC On Bringing Chief Justice Under RTI

Is The Collegium System Hollowing Up The Strongest Pillar Of Democracy?

Center High Court Judges India

While High Courts Work In Absence Of 384 Judges, Center Sitting On 97 Names Recommended By Collegium

ias tukaram mundhe

12th Transfer In 13 Yrs, 4th Transfer Since 2016, Who Is IAS Tukaram Mundhe?

Justice Chelameswar

Know About Justice Chelameswar Who Retired Today After A Seven-Year Tenure In Supreme Court

“Life & Existence Of SC Under Threat”, SC Judge Writes To CJI As Centre Sits On Collegium’s Recommendation

Latest on The Logical Indian

My Story

My Story: “In Grieving Kashmir, My Useless Landline Turned Into A Lifeline”


Majoritarianism & Authoritarianism Taking India Down A “Dark & Uncertain Path”: Raghuram Rajan


Primary School Children Served “Turmeric-Rice” For Mid-Day Meal in Uttar Pradesh


UP: Man Goes To Bury Deceased Daughter, Finds Baby Girl Buried Alive


GST Might Have Flaws, But We Cannot Just Damn It Now: Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman

World Affairs

World Bank Slashes India’s Growth Rate To 6%, Warns Of ‘Severe’ Economic Slowdown


Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.