Modi Govt Cracks The Whip: 12 Officials Of Income Tax Dept Forced To Retire Over Charges Of Corruption, Among Others

The Logical Indian Crew India

June 11th, 2019 / 6:48 PM

Income Tax Official Forced Retirement

Image Credit: Hindustan Times

On June 10, the central government forced 12 senior officials of the Income Tax Department to retire. Some of those asked to take compulsory retirement are facing charges of corruption and harassment, among others.

The 12 officials are of the rank of Chief Commissioners, Principal Commissioners and Commissioners of Income Tax, etc. The officials will be paid salary and allowances for a period of three months. This amount would be equivalent to the rate at which they would have received compensation immediately before their retirement.

Compulsory Retirement of Officials

The order issued by the Finance Ministry has quoted clause J of rule 56 of the Fundamental Rule. The ministry on June 10 said, “In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (j) of rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, the President of India has retired 12 Officers of the Indian Revenue Service (Income Tax) in public interest with immediate effect from the afternoon of June 11, 2019 on completing 50 years of age.”

The list of these officials includes Ashok Agarwal- Joint Commissioner of I-T, SK Srivastava- Commissioner (Appeal, Noida) and Homi Rajvansh, an official of Revenue Service.

Ashok Agarwal had been suspended from 1999 to 2015. He faced allegations of corruption and extortion.

SK Srivastava was accused of sexually harassing two women officials. Additionally, he served 15 days of civil imprisonment for allegations against former chairman and members of the Central Board of Direct Taxes.

Homi Rajvansh, through alleged corrupt means, has acquired movable and immovable assets worth Rs 3.17 crore.

The charges levied on some of these officials range from corruption, extortion, sexual harassment, illegally stopping the promotion of colleagues, among others. Reportedly, a few officials were simply forced to retire because they were found to be ‘chronically ineffectual’ at their jobs.

Notably, the decision to outrightly remove the officials was taken instead of opting for other options, like that of giving them three months’ notice. As per clause (j) of rule 56 of the Fundamental Rules, “The Appropriate Authority shall, if it is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to do so, have the absolute right to retire any Government servant by giving him notice of not less than three months in writing or three months’ pay and allowances in lieu of such notice.”

Also Read: Fire In IT Office In Mumbai’s Scindia House, Sensitive Tax Evasion Documents Feared To Be Lost


Written by : Shraddha Goled

Edited by : Shweta Kothari

Related Stories

Rs 400 Cr ‘Benami Plot’ Belonging To Mayawati’s Brother Seized By Income Tax Dept

Corruption Crackdown: Govt Retires 15 Officials With Immediate Effect

Hyderabad Traffic Police Drunk Driving

Hyderabad Traffic Police Cracks The Whip, Arrests 775 People In 90 Days For Drunk Driving

Sonia Rahul Tax

IT Dept Claims Rahul And Sonia Gandhi Didn’t Pay Income Tax Of Rs 100 Cr

French NGO Rafale

French ‘Anti-Corruption’ NGO Registers Complaint To Probe Corruption In Rafale Deal

Mayank Jain IPS Officer

MP: IPS Officer To Retire Over “Non-Performance” After MHA Order

Latest on The Logical Indian


NLU Topper Refuses Gold Medal To Protest SC’s Handling Of Sexual Harassment Charges Against CJI


“Before Newton, Concept Of Gravity Explained In Indian Scriptures”: HRD Minister Pokhriyal


UP: Woman Burnt Alive By Husband, In-Laws For Complaining Against Triple Talaq


Amid Massive Fire At AIIMS, Doctors Help Deliver Girl, Say It’s Their Duty


Kerala: 10-Yr-Old Autistic Boy Alleges Sexual Abuse By Teacher, School Calls Him ‘Liar’


Award-Winning DD News Anchor Neelum Sharma No More


Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.