If No Eligible Candidates From Reserved Category, Fill Up Vacancy On Merit: Tripura HC

The Logical Indian

August 25th, 2015

News Source: Livelaw

In a writ petition arisen out of the admission process to the MBBS course in the Tripura Medical College and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital, the Tripura High Court has held that if the seats for any particular reserved category are not filled up due to non-availability of sufficient number of eligible candidates in that particular category, it should not be filled up by applying the exchange method and offering those seats to the other reserved category. On the contrary, the seats should be treated unreserved, and then the seats should be filled up on the basis of merit.

What The Petition Was About?

Out of 25 seats reserved for ST candidates, only 13 could be filled up, while the remaining 12 were left vacant. The issue was whether these 12 seats should be filled up by exchange method from amongst the eligible SC candidates or should they be filled up on the basis of merit.

The petitioners had relied upon Section 5 and sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 Tripura Scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Rules, 1992, to contend that “exchange method” can be applied to educational institutions as well.

But the court found that the words “selecting authority” or “educational institutions” have not been used in the said rule and hence the rule can be read only in context of filling up vacant posts in government service.

“We cannot insert the words “vacant seats in educational institutions” in sub-rule (8) (a), the court said.

As reported in Live Law, it was asserted that Section 5 Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act, 1991, was brought in the year 2005 whereas sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 was existing prior to that and, therefore, sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 should be read in such a manner that it is consistent with Section 5.

The court held “when the legislature introduced Section 5 and amended the Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act, 1991 and brought in the concept of reservation for SC and ST in educational institutions, the legislature must have been aware what are the rules and accordingly some rules were amended. The court also found out the substantive amendments made to the rule in the year 2007. Even Rule 8 was the subject matter of amendment and even after amendment in the year 2007, no mention of seats in educational institutions is there in sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8. “

Share your thoughts..

Propelled by

VOLVO

Make Your City Safe

Related Stories

Haryana Human Rights Commission

Haryana Human Rights Commission Stays Memberless, People Deprived Of Platform To Lodge Complaints

Airlines Liable To Compensate If Passengers With Confirmed Tickets Are Denied Boarding Due To Over-Booking: DGCA

Vyapam Scam: MD Of Medical College Involved In 2012 Pre-Medical Test Scam Surrenders Before Court

12,460 Assistant Teachers’ Vacancy Yet To Be Filled In UP, Candidates Waiting For Over 9 Months

Here Is What Various Parties Told The Parliamentary Committee On Women’s Reservation

India Has Less Than 6 Medical College Seats For Every Lakh Population

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

16-Yr-Old Girl Chopped To Death For Demanding Salary; Was Lured From Jharkhand To Work As A Maid In Delhi

Get Inspired

Man Breaks Ramzan Fast To Donate Blood To Fellow Human

News

Gujarat: 5,229 Farmers Request Mass Euthanasia To Protest Land Acquisition

News

UP Villagers Crowd-Fund A New College After It Was Left Abandoned By Bachchan Family

News

Bengal Woman Paraded With Shoe Garland For Protesting Alleged Booth Capturing By TMC Workers

Exclusive

SEEtalks: When Ordinary People Do Extraordinary Things To Spread Happiness