If No Eligible Candidates From Reserved Category, Fill Up Vacancy On Merit: Tripura HC

The Logical Indian

August 25th, 2015 / 5:30 PM

News Source: Livelaw

In a writ petition arisen out of the admission process to the MBBS course in the Tripura Medical College and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital, the Tripura High Court has held that if the seats for any particular reserved category are not filled up due to non-availability of sufficient number of eligible candidates in that particular category, it should not be filled up by applying the exchange method and offering those seats to the other reserved category. On the contrary, the seats should be treated unreserved, and then the seats should be filled up on the basis of merit.

What The Petition Was About?

Out of 25 seats reserved for ST candidates, only 13 could be filled up, while the remaining 12 were left vacant. The issue was whether these 12 seats should be filled up by exchange method from amongst the eligible SC candidates or should they be filled up on the basis of merit.

The petitioners had relied upon Section 5 and sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 Tripura Scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Rules, 1992, to contend that “exchange method” can be applied to educational institutions as well.

But the court found that the words “selecting authority” or “educational institutions” have not been used in the said rule and hence the rule can be read only in context of filling up vacant posts in government service.

“We cannot insert the words “vacant seats in educational institutions” in sub-rule (8) (a), the court said.

As reported in Live Law, it was asserted that Section 5 Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act, 1991, was brought in the year 2005 whereas sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 was existing prior to that and, therefore, sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 should be read in such a manner that it is consistent with Section 5.

The court held “when the legislature introduced Section 5 and amended the Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act, 1991 and brought in the concept of reservation for SC and ST in educational institutions, the legislature must have been aware what are the rules and accordingly some rules were amended. The court also found out the substantive amendments made to the rule in the year 2007. Even Rule 8 was the subject matter of amendment and even after amendment in the year 2007, no mention of seats in educational institutions is there in sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8. “


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

ST Woman Married To Muslim Has To Prove Tribal Identity Before Contesting From Reserved Seat: Bombay High Court

Only 16% Indians With Foreign Medical Degrees Are Fit (Eligible) To Practice In The Country

UPSC Reduces Vacancy In Civil Services To The Lowest In 6 Years When India Has A Shortage Of Nearly 1,500 IAS Officers

12,460 Assistant Teachers’ Vacancy Yet To Be Filled In UP, Candidates Waiting For Over 9 Months

In A First, Pakistan Issues Passport With ‘X’ Gender Category For A Transgender

Human Development Index

Human Development Index: India Slips Down One Place, Placed In “Medium Human Development” Category

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

“Stop Killing Us,” Hundreds Gather At Jantar Mantar To Protest Deaths Of Sanitation Workers

Exclusive

“Fell At Officials Feet, Even Then They Razed Our Farms,” Jharkhand Farmers Claim Land Taken Forcefully For Adani’s Powerplant

Fact Check

Fact Check: Is Sikkim’s First Airport The 100th Airport Of India As Claimed By PM Modi?

News

Arrested For 22-Yr-Old Case, Sanjiv Bhatt’s Wife Says, ”He Is Being Punished For Criticising PM Modi”

Opinion

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s Irresponsible Statements

News

Stranded At Sea, Commander Abhilash Tomy Rescued After 72 Hours Of Multinational Effort

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.