If No Eligible Candidates From Reserved Category, Fill Up Vacancy On Merit: Tripura HC

The Logical Indian

August 25th, 2015 / 5:30 PM

News Source: Livelaw

In a writ petition arisen out of the admission process to the MBBS course in the Tripura Medical College and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital, the Tripura High Court has held that if the seats for any particular reserved category are not filled up due to non-availability of sufficient number of eligible candidates in that particular category, it should not be filled up by applying the exchange method and offering those seats to the other reserved category. On the contrary, the seats should be treated unreserved, and then the seats should be filled up on the basis of merit.

What The Petition Was About?

Out of 25 seats reserved for ST candidates, only 13 could be filled up, while the remaining 12 were left vacant. The issue was whether these 12 seats should be filled up by exchange method from amongst the eligible SC candidates or should they be filled up on the basis of merit.

The petitioners had relied upon Section 5 and sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 Tripura Scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Rules, 1992, to contend that “exchange method” can be applied to educational institutions as well.

But the court found that the words “selecting authority” or “educational institutions” have not been used in the said rule and hence the rule can be read only in context of filling up vacant posts in government service.

“We cannot insert the words “vacant seats in educational institutions” in sub-rule (8) (a), the court said.

As reported in Live Law, it was asserted that Section 5 Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act, 1991, was brought in the year 2005 whereas sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 was existing prior to that and, therefore, sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8 should be read in such a manner that it is consistent with Section 5.

The court held “when the legislature introduced Section 5 and amended the Tripura Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Reservation Act, 1991 and brought in the concept of reservation for SC and ST in educational institutions, the legislature must have been aware what are the rules and accordingly some rules were amended. The court also found out the substantive amendments made to the rule in the year 2007. Even Rule 8 was the subject matter of amendment and even after amendment in the year 2007, no mention of seats in educational institutions is there in sub-rule (8)(a) of Rule 8. “


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Related Stories

NEET OBC SC ST Candidates

NEET Exam: 80% Qualified Candidates Of OBC, SC & ST Category Also Clear General Category Cut-Off

Trump Proposes Merit-Based Green Card System: Merit Over Familial Relationships

Bihar Sunny Tops JE

Bogus Candidates Including Sunny Leone’s Name Appear On Junior Engineer Merit List; Dept To Take Action

Mumbai Traffic Police Fill Potholes

Amidst Heavy Rain, Mumbai Traffic Police Fill Potholes On Highway

ST Woman Married To Muslim Has To Prove Tribal Identity Before Contesting From Reserved Seat: Bombay High Court

Cash Crunch In AP & Telangana; Money Being Shipped From Kerala, TN To Fill Dry ATMs

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

“Lynching In Jharkhand Has Pained Me”: Modi Addresses NRC, Water Crisis & EVM Issue In Rajya Sabha

News

Around 54 Thousand Mangroves Will Be Cut To Build The Mumbai-Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project

News

TMC Leader Refunds Over Rs 2.25 Lakh Of ‘Cut-Money’ After Facing Protests

News

Govt To Levy Tax On Disability Pension Of Armed Force Personnel

Opinion

Over 3 Crore Cases Were Pending In Court Till 2017, There Is Solution To It If The Govt Intends To Address It

News

FIR Against 19 Villagers Protesting Against AES Deaths In Bihar For Blocking Highway

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.