Mere Physical Contact, Even Though Unwelcome, Would Not Amount To Sexual Harassment: Delhi High Court

The Logical Indian Crew

November 2nd, 2017

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday, October 31, said that every unwelcome physical contact cannot be categorised as sexual harassment.

The petitioner, Shanta Kumar, said in her complaint that while she was working at the laboratory in Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), the respondent “stopped the machine and snatched the samples” from her and had “thrown the materials”. She continued that he had, thereafter, “pushed the petitioner out of the laboratory and had locked the laboratory.”

She also alleged that “he was shouting and using derogatory language against one Dr Sood and Scheduled Castes Community (as she was married to a person belonging to the SC category).” However, it appears that the said complaint was not forwarded to the concerned authorities at the relevant time, the court observed.

Kumar’s appeal had previously been quashed by the Complaint Committee as well as the Disciplinary Authority and the respondent was given a clean chit.

She then moved the Delhi HC. However, Justice Vibhu Bakhru explained, Undoubtedly, physical contact or advances would constitute sexual harassment provided such physical contact is a part of the sexually determined behaviour. Such physical contact must be in the context of a behaviour which is sexually oriented. Plainly, a mere accidental physical contact, even though unwelcome, would not amount to sexual harassment. Similarly, a physical contact which has no undertone of a sexual nature and is not occasioned by the gender of the complainant may not necessarily amount to sexual harassment.

Kumar had claimed that the respondent held her arm and any unwelcome physical contact should be categorized as sexual harassment.

However, the Court observed, “although the Complaint Committee had accepted that there was evidence to show that respondent no.3 had held the arm of the petitioner, it had concluded that the same was not a sexually determined behaviour but was in the nature of the altercation,” and concluded that it finds no merit in the present petition, thus, dismissing the case.


You can read the entire verdict here.

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Delhi School: 4-Yr-Old Booked For Sexually Assaulting Classmate; Mother Wants Action Against School

SHe-Box

Govt Launches Portal To Lodge Sexual Harassment At Workplace Complaints By Both Public & Pvt Sector Employees

Marital Rape

Marital Rape Is A Disgraceful Offence That Has Scarred The Trust & Confidence In The Institution Of Marriage: Gujarat HC

Mahmood Farooqui

Delhi HC Acquits Peepli Live Director Mahmood Farooqui Of Rape Charges, Citing A Feeble ‘No’ May Mean A ‘Yes’

Sexual Harassment Cases

Information On Sexual Harassment Cases To Be Furnished To The Victims Within 48 Hours: CIC

Paid Leave

Women Employees In Central Govt. Fighting Sexual Harassment Will Get 90 Days’ Paid Leave

Latest on The Logical Indian

Get Inspired

Meet India’s First Woman Coolie Who Works With 45 Other Men In Katni Railway Station

News

Odisha: Alleged Gang Rape Victim Commits Suicide Over Delay In Investigation

Get Inspired

One Of India’s Most Vocal Transgender Rights Activist, Akkai, Makes Her Marriage Official

Fact Check

India Today Uses 2-Year-Old YouTube Video To Report Pakistani Mortar Fire

My Story

My Story: “I Got Cancer, But When Nobody Was With Me, She Wrote Me Poems To Show Her Support”

News

3 Men Attacked By Mob For Refusing “Virginity Test” On Brides