Mere Physical Contact, Even Though Unwelcome, Would Not Amount To Sexual Harassment: Delhi High Court

The Logical Indian Crew Delhi

November 2nd, 2017 / 5:00 PM

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday, October 31, said that every unwelcome physical contact cannot be categorised as sexual harassment.

The petitioner, Shanta Kumar, said in her complaint that while she was working at the laboratory in Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), the respondent “stopped the machine and snatched the samples” from her and had “thrown the materials”. She continued that he had, thereafter, “pushed the petitioner out of the laboratory and had locked the laboratory.”

She also alleged that “he was shouting and using derogatory language against one Dr Sood and Scheduled Castes Community (as she was married to a person belonging to the SC category).” However, it appears that the said complaint was not forwarded to the concerned authorities at the relevant time, the court observed.

Kumar’s appeal had previously been quashed by the Complaint Committee as well as the Disciplinary Authority and the respondent was given a clean chit.

She then moved the Delhi HC. However, Justice Vibhu Bakhru explained, Undoubtedly, physical contact or advances would constitute sexual harassment provided such physical contact is a part of the sexually determined behaviour. Such physical contact must be in the context of a behaviour which is sexually oriented. Plainly, a mere accidental physical contact, even though unwelcome, would not amount to sexual harassment. Similarly, a physical contact which has no undertone of a sexual nature and is not occasioned by the gender of the complainant may not necessarily amount to sexual harassment.

Kumar had claimed that the respondent held her arm and any unwelcome physical contact should be categorized as sexual harassment.

However, the Court observed, “although the Complaint Committee had accepted that there was evidence to show that respondent no.3 had held the arm of the petitioner, it had concluded that the same was not a sexually determined behaviour but was in the nature of the altercation,” and concluded that it finds no merit in the present petition, thus, dismissing the case.


You can read the entire verdict here.


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Related Stories

Sahir Ludhiyanvi, Poet

‘Masroof Zamana Mere Liye Kyu Waqt Apna Barbad Kare’: Sahir Ludhyanvi’s Nazms Found In Mumbai Scrap Shop

Geneva Conventions Abhinandan

Geneva Conventions: Prisoners Of War Must Be Treated Respectfully; Cannot Be Subjected To Mental Or Physical Torture

Indian Garment 11p

Major Western Brands Pay A Mere 11p Per Hour To Indian Garment Workers, Reveals Study

Women Candidates Mizoram Elections

Mizoram Election: 15 Out Of 200 Candidates Are Female Even Though More Than Half Of Voters Are Women

No Action On Sexual Harassment Even After Complaining To Governor, 28-Yr-Old Doctor Commits Suicide

Old Age Pension

3.5 Cr Elderly Poor Are Being Given Pension Of Mere Rs 200 For Last 12 Yrs

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Woman And 3-Month-Old Daughter Burnt Alive Over Dowry Demand In UP

News

No Subsidised Ration For Those Who Fail To Pay Electricity Dues: District Magistrate In UP

News

Unable To Get Aadhaar Card Error Rectified, Muslim Man Commits Suicide Fearing NRC Trouble

Exclusive

Black Flags To Babul Supriyo, Varsity Ransacked By ABVP: Full Picture Of What Transpired In Jadavpur University

News

‘Sexual Conversation, Body Massage’: Chinmayanand Confesses To Crime, Says ‘I am Ashamed’

News

Even As Two UP Lawmakers Face Rape Charges, CM Claims Cases Of Rape Went Down By 36% In 2 Yrs

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.