Even As Centre Seeks Recall Of Amendments In The SC & ST Act, 2 States Direct Police To Implement Order

Supported by

Even as the centre seeks for the recall of the Supreme Court’s order on the “dilution” of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, two BJP-ruled states, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan have already issued directives to the police to strictly implement the order.

Chattisgarh, which had earlier ordered its police to implement the amendments, has now suspended the order.

While Haryana has sought legal advice on this issue, Himachal Pradesh has issued informal order among police officers. In Congress-ruled Karnataka, the order has been circulated informally. Another Congress-ruled state, Punjab, as per official sources, has put the order-related file before the chief minister Amarinder Singh, which he will review after he returns.

In Kerala, which is the only state to have challenged the order, the police chief has just forwarded the order and in West Bengal, Additional Director General (ADG) CID Sanjay Singh said, “I can only comment on the order once I see it.”

Notably, it is being said that the centre had informed that state governments “should not do anything by which the SC/ST Act is weakened or whittled down”.

Background

On March 20, the Supreme Court issued a directive saying that action against public servants accused of hostility towards SC/ST would be taken only with written permission from their respective appointing authorities. Also, the action against accused private citizens would be taken only if the concerned senior superintendent of police allows. Besides this, the bench of Justices AK Goel and UU Lalit also ruled that a preliminary inquiry should be conducted before the FIR is registered to check if the case falls under the parameters of the Atrocities Act or if it is frivolous or motivated.

Dalit groups across the country feel that the Supreme Court’s order, which bans automatic arrest and registration of cases for alleged harassment of SCs and STs, will dilute the Prevention of Atrocities Act, 1989 which aims to protect the marginalised.

The reported “dilution” of the law was done to curb “abuse of law”. The court judgement said, “Innocent citizens are termed accused, which is not intended by the legislature. The legislature never intended to use the Atrocities Act as an instrument to blackmail or to wreck personal vengeance.

The Centre told the Supreme Court that its judgment on the amendments to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 “has caused a lot of commotion in the country and is also creating anger, unease and a sense of disharmony” and asked SC to review its orders.

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

P&G Shiksha

P&G Shiksha Turns 20 And These Stories Say It All

Amplified by

Isha Foundation

Sadhguru’s Meditation App ‘Miracle of Mind’ Hits 1 Million Downloads in 15 Hours, Surpassing ChatGPT’s Early Growth

Recent Stories

Uttarakhand’s ₹2 Crore Bridge Still Incomplete: 15 Tehri Villages Cut Off, Villagers Risk Lives Crossing River on JCBs

Teen Sexually Assaulted and Women Robbed at Knifepoint on Pune-Solapur Highway Near Bhigwan

40 Minutes for 3 Km: Bengaluru Man’s Traffic Struggle Goes Viral, Netizens Say ‘Better Finish Lunch and Login’

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :