Rs 50 Crore Defamation Suit Filed Against Police Officer Who Exposed VIP Treatment To Sasikala In Jail

The Logical Indian Crew Karnataka

July 27th, 2017 / 12:16 PM

Image credits: timesofindia, outlookindia, bangaloremirror

Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of Prisons D Roopa, whose report had alleged special treatment provided to politicians and interim general secretary of AIADMK VK Sasikala, has been served a defamation notice by HN Satyanarayana Rao, the state’s Director General of Prisons and Roopa’s former boss.

In the seven-page notice, dated July 16, 2017, issued by Rao’s lawyer on his behalf, allegations made by Roopa against Rao are referred to.

“You (D Roopa) are required to get an apology duly published in all leading newspapers in the next three days, failing which, I will be constrained to initiate appropriate legal proceedings both civil and criminal, against you to recover damages from you and the same is quantified as Rs 50 crore tentatively,” Rao said in the notice


Roopa’s report alleging that Sasikala enjoyed special treatment in jail

Concerns that special treatment has been give to Sasikala, one of Parappana Agrahara’s more recognised inmates, is not new. In April, a Right to Information (RTI) reply revealed that Sasikala was allowed more than her share of visitors and many after the 5 pm deadline.

Roopa paid the prison a surprise visit on July 10 when she discovered serious irregularities.

According to the report by Roopa, Sasikala’s special treatment included an exclusive kitchen for her meals, deputing inmates to cook food for her, flouting of prison norms to suit her schedule, and other discrepancies involving other inmates, including under-trials being deputed to serve prisoners and instances of drug usage.


Roopa’s allegations against Rao

Roopa’s report alleged that Sasikala and her party members had paid a bribe of about Rs 2 crore to jail officials to secure their special treatment and their silence. And while the report did not directly accuse Rao, it did indicate “speculation” that Mr Rao might have been a beneficiary of the bribe.

Rao, who has also been transferred by the state government, called the allegations in the report “wild and baseless”. He has been transferred only days before his retirement; his new posting has not been disclosed yet.


Rao’s defamation notice

In his notice, Rao claimed that Roopa’s allegations have caused severe damage to his name, fame, integrity and mental agony.

“The notice mentions that Roopa based her allegation on hearsay. She has not only damaged Rao’s reputation just prior to his retirement after serving the department for 30-plus years, but also dented his credentials in reputed wings like the CBI and Lokayukta, where he had worked and earned a good name,” a source which accessed the notice was quoted by The Times of India as saying.

Rao’s lawyer argued that if Roopa could take pictures on prison premises, why did she not take photographs of inmates receiving special treatment?

“You claim that you have taken pictures of irregularities inside the prison. But you have not taken the picture of Sasikala’s separate kitchen and other royal facilities, which are the prime subject of your allegations. You could not take pictures because nothing like that existed,” Rao’s notice read.


Roopa and Rao were transferred earlier this month

Following her revelations, Roopa was transferred by the Karnataka state government to road safety and traffic on Monday, 17 July. Also transferred was HN Satyanarayana Rao.


The government notification on Monday, 17 July, transferring Roopa.

Amidst the outrage evoked by Roopa’s report, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah ordered an inquiry into the functioning of the central prison.

However, he also warned that action could be taken against Roopa for violating her service rules by going to the media. He told reporters, “It is an administrative process, it is not necessary to disclose everything to the media … We have given her a notice. You don’t have go to the TV all the time if you have documents and evidence, please give. We have no objection regarding corruption and bribery but going to TV and newspapers: that is prohibited. Service rules don’t permit.”

Roopa, however, said that she had not leaked her report, which had been sent to five senior officials in the government.

The senior police officer said she had no axe to grind and if she had anything to hide, “I wouldn’t have taken the step of exposing (irregularities in jail).”


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Anil Ambani Rafale Jet Deal

Anil Ambani Files Rs 5,000 Crore Defamation Case Against National Herald Over Article On Rafale Deal

SC Asks Gujarat Trial Court To Stop Proceeding On Defamation Case Filed By Jay Shah On The Wire

Bank Of India To Levy Charges On Free Services From Jan 20; Will Other Banks Follow Suit?

Sasikala

Income Tax Raids Against Sasikala & Kin Reveals Rs 1430 Crore Worth Benami Wealth

Radhe Maa

Delhi Police Gives VIP Treatment, Offers SHO’s Chair To Radhe Maa, Who Is Accused Of Mental Harassment In A Dowry Case

The Hindu Apologises & Retracts The Story ”Dying Woman Get Molested”; Other Media Need To Follow Suit

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Delhi Ranked 6th In The List Of Fastest Growing, Best Performing Metro Cities In The World: Study

News

Aadhaar Not Needed For Opening Bank Accounts, SIM But Mandatory For PAN Card: SC Verdict

My Story

My Story: Now I Know Why My Father Insisted On Carrying Home Packed Food During Train Journeys

News

[Video] “Hindu Ke Hote Huye Muslim Chahiye?” UP Police Beat Woman For Having Muslim Friend

Opinion

Telangana Honour Killing: Why Are People Justifying Murder In The Name Of Parental Love?

Awareness

6 Years, 26 Judges And At Least 27 Petitioners: Here’s A Look At Aadhaar Case Timeline

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.