Centre Says Can’t Deny Reservation In Promotion To SC/ST Based On Creamy Layer Concept In Govt Jobs

The Logical Indian Crew India

August 17th, 2018 / 4:55 PM

reservation promotion

Image Credits: Live Law, Indian Express(Representational)

On August 16, the Centre told the Supreme Court that reservation in promotion in government jobs could not be denied to those belonging to the “creamy layer” adding that once backwardness is presumed and benefits are given, it cannot be taken back.


“They still live with the stigma”

Attorney General KK Venugopal told the bench headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dipak Misra that only the President and the Parliament have the power to take away benefits from a certain class of SC/ST. He also said that though few people from the SC/ST community have managed to rise from poverty, they still continue to live with the stigma of caste and backwardness.

Creamy layer, by definition, in the Indian context refers to the socio-economically well-off members of marginalised communities.

As reported by Indian Express, Venugopal told the bench comprising Justice Kurian Joseph, Justice R F Nariman, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice Indu Malhotra, “They have to marry from their own caste. Even a well-off person of SC/ST community cannot marry from a higher caste. The fact that some persons have become affluent does not take away the imprint of caste and backwardness.”


Nagaraj verdict

This five-judge bench is examining the 2006 verdict in the M Nagaraj vs Union of India judgement. This particular judgement had ruled that “providing reservation in promotion with consequential seniority as being unconstitutional and violative of the basic structure.” The Nagraj verdict had further stated that if at all the state wanted to introduce reservation in promotion for SC/ST employees, it would have to then furnish data showing backwardness of the class and poor representation of that class in public employment.


Nagaraj Verdict non-implementable: AG

In August 3 hearing, Venugopal had termed the Nagaraj judgement as non-implementable. To this, SC replied that why the states have not collected the quantifiable data, even after 12 years of the Nagaraj verdict. To this Venugopal said, “Because it’s a dynamic process. People die, retire or are transferred, and data keeps fluctuating.”

Venugopal said that Article 16(4)(a) which deals with reservation was a call to affirmative action.


Also Read: Supreme Court Clears Govt’s Plea For Reservation Of SC/ST Employees In Promotion


Contributors

Written by : Shraddha Goled

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

UN Study Ozone Layer

Good News: Ozone Layer Is Recovering At The Rate Of 1 To 3 Percent Per Decade, Says UN Study

SC ST Creamy Layer

Supreme Court Recommends Extending Creamy Layer Concept To SC/ST Reservation In Promotion

Indore Open Jail Concept: Inmates Can Now Live With Families And Start Small Businesses

MLA Ram Kadam

BJP MLA Offers To “Kidnap Girls” Who Deny Marriage Proposals, Later Says He Was Misunderstood

reservation promotion

Centre Says Can’t Deny Reservation In Promotion To SC/ST Based On Creamy Layer Concept In Govt Jobs

ESI Corporation Employees

HC Says ESI Corporation Cannot Deny Certificate To The Employees For Late Filing Of Returns

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Plastic Ban: A Patchwork Of Good Intentions And Half-Hearted Implementation

Exclusive

Suspended Civil Servant Files Complaint After Twitter Trolls Issue Rape Threats To Wife

News

After India Bans PSL, Pakistan Stops Broadcast Of IPL Across Nation

News

Citing Increase In Drunk Driving Cases, Mizoram To Become Dry State From April 1

News

WB: Hunger Strike By School Service Commission Aspirants Enters 4th Week; Several Admitted To Hospital After Falling Sick

Legal

“It Is Cold-Blooded Murder,” Says Father Of J&K Principal Who Was “Killed” In Police Custody

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.