UP: Azam Khan Charged With Sedition For Comments On Army, Booked Under Section 124A

The Logical Indian Crew Uttar Pradesh

July 5th, 2017 / 1:09 PM

Azam Khan

Image Credit: Financial Express | Courtesy: The Hindu

Samajwadi Party (SP) leader and Member of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly Azam Khan has found himself at the centre of controversy again after being booked for sedition on Saturday, 1 July, for remarks allegedly in disrespect of the Indian Army.

On 27 June, addressing a rally in Rampur, Khan said excesses by security forces had led to “women in some places chopping off the private parts of Army men”. He said soldiers were being beaten up by women in conflict-areas of Kashmir, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh and Jharkhand.

Khan’s comments evoked outrage. A case was filed on behalf of Vishwa Hindu Parishad member Anil Pandey at Chandpur police station in west Uttar Pradesh under Section 124A (sedition) of the Indian Penal Code.

According to The Hindu, the FIR also invoked Section 131 (abetting mutiny or attempting to seduce a soldier, sailor or airman from his duty) and Section 505 (statements conducing to public mischief).

Khan, however, argued that his comments were taken out of context and said he did not intend to insult the Army.

Khan’s controversial comments

In a gathering in his home district of Rampur, Khan said excesses by security forces were “compelling women militants to chop the private parts of jawans as revenge … Many people mutilate heads or chop off hands, but in this instance, they did not have any complaint with the head, the hands or the foot. Women militants mutilated the private parts of the soldiers and took them away. The body part that they had a grievance with, they chopped it off. It sends a big message, something that entire India should be ashamed of.”

The comments invited widespread criticism, particularly on social media. No less that three cases have been filed against Khan, the most notable one being under Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code, accusing Khan of sedition.

Section 124A reads thus: “Whoever, by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise, brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt, or excites or attempts to excite disaffection towards the Government estab­lished by law shall be punished with [im­prisonment for life], to which fine may be added, or with impris­onment which may extend to three years, to which fine may be added, or with fine.”

Not the only case filed against Khan

Besides the aforementioned FIR, another case was registered against Khan in Rampur by Akash Saxena, son of former BJP minister Shiv Bahadur Saxena. In this case, Khan was booked under Section 153A (promoting enmity between different groups) and Section 505 (statements conducing to public mischief).

Saxena said Khan’s comments dented the “morale of the Army” and their sentiment towards the constitution, and his words were therefore, “anti-constitutional, anti-army and anti-India.”

Meanwhile, Bajrang Dal leaders in Meerut also filed a complaint against Azam Khan.

Khan’s clarification

In clarification, Khan pointed to newspaper clippings with news stories of female Naxals in Sukma, Chhatisgarh having mutilated the private parts of six jawans.

He said, “The meaning of my words has been misconstrued. The media published this news. If it was so sensitive, why was it not censored, why did the TV telecast it … How can the Army’s morale fall because of me? I am nobody. The Army’s morale fell when Prime Minister Narendra Modi went to Pakistan, while our soldiers were being beheaded.”

Also Read: Section 124A: The Most Anti-National Thing In India’s Independent History


Written by :

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Indian Army Recognizes Valour

On Indian Army’s Recommendation, Pakistani Captain Who Was Killed In Kargil War Awarded

Corruption Charges Against Dr Kafeel Khan Dropped; Murder Charges Still Remain

Facebook Personal Chat

Teenager Arrested For Posting Derogatory Comments About PM Modi In Facebook Personal Chat

Salman Khan

After 18 Years, Jodhpur Court Acquits Salman Khan Giving Him Benefit Of Doubt

I Am Not A Terrorist

Man Labelled As Terrorist By Landlord After He Denied To Pay House Maintenance Charge

Supreme Court: Strong Criticism Against The Government Is Not Defamatory Or Seditious

Latest on The Logical Indian


Hapur Lynching Survivor Waits For Police To Record Statement, Says Can Identify Accused


An Online Memorial That Honours Those Who Once Wore The Indian Military Uniform

My Story

My Story: I Was Sexually Harassed On A Train & People Said It Happened Because I Was Travelling Alone

Fact Check

Fact Check: No, Uttarakhand Govt Won’t Charge For Helicopter Rides During Rescue Missions


Irony: Centre Might Amend Right To Information Act Without Prior Information


Bombay HC: Elderly Parents If Ill-Treated Can Take Back Gifted Property From Son


Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.