SC Asks Parties To Resolve Ayodhya Dispute Outside Court; Know About It

The Logical Indian Uttar Pradesh

March 21st, 2017 / 12:49 PM

Ayodhya Dispute

Source: India Today | Image Courtesy: Nitin Rai | National Dastak

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today asked the parties involved in the Ayodhya dispute to sort the matter outside Court.

Hearing a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court said the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya is an issue of sentiment and religion. The Court said, “The matter involves sentiments on both sides. It should be settled amicably between the disputing parties … The Supreme Court will come in the picture if you can’t settle the dispute outside the Court.”

In his plea, the BJP leader said numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement had failed and a judicial intervention was required. Swamy was told to mention the case on March 31.


The Ayodhya dispute

The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical, and socio-religious debate in India. It is centred on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around

  1. access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Rama,
  2. the history and location of the Babri Mosque at the site,
  3. and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished or modified to create the mosque.

The Ram Janmabhoomi debate climaxed on 6 December 1992 when a mob tore down the disputed 16th-century Babri mosque in Ayodhya claiming it to be the birthplace of Rama. The following months saw the most brutal Hindu-Muslim riots of post-Partition India, killing at least 2,000 and displacing many more.

Relying on evidence provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, three judges of the Allahabad High Court issued a landmark judgement on the dispute in September 2010. The Court ruled that the land be divided into 3 parts, with

  1. 1/3 for the construction of the Ram temple,
  2. 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board,
  3. and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination called Nirmohi Akhara.

While the verdict was not unanimous over whether the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, the Court said that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site.

In 2010, the Supreme  Court had put a freeze on the judgment by the Allahabad High Court. The Ram Mandir case has been pending before the apex court for over six years.


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Related Stories

Tamil Nadu Water Crisis

Frantic Desperation As Water Crisis Worsens: Woman Stabbed By Neighbour Over Water Dispute In Tamil Nadu

Controlling air and water pollution is one of the major promises made by almost all the political parties. Photo by CIAT/Flickr.

Environmental Issues Get Into Parties Manifestos: Know Which Party Has Promised What

Ayodhya Case Supreme Court

Ayodhya Case: Supreme Court Orders Mediation With A 3-Member Panel

name changes yogi adityanath

Faizabad District Renamed As Ayodhya; Yogi’s Name-Changing Spree Continues Unabated

Yogi Adityanath Ram Statue

Yogi Adityanath Confirms Building Ram Statue In Ayodhya; UP Govt Starts Process To Build It

India, Pakistan Agree To Resolve Issue Of Alleged Harassment Of Diplomats

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

‘It’s Hurting Our Business: Over 2,000 Restaurants ‘Log Out’ Of Zomato Criticise Deep Discounts

News

Stunning Blue Light Appears On Chennai Beach, Leaves Visitors Puzzled

News

Iceland Holds Funeral Of Glacier Lost To Climate Change

Awareness

Facing Shutdown & Job Losses, Textiles Association Issues Ad In Newspaper Begging Govt’s Attention

News

Girls Can Now Wear Shorts: Kerala School’s Unique Initiative To Promote Gender Neutral Dress Code

News

Girls Can Now Wear Shorts: Kerala School’s Unique Initiative To Promote Gender Neutral Dress Code

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.