SC Asks Parties To Resolve Ayodhya Dispute Outside Court; Know About It

The Logical Indian Uttar Pradesh

March 21st, 2017 / 12:49 PM

Ayodhya Dispute

Source: India Today | Image Courtesy: Nitin Rai | National Dastak

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today asked the parties involved in the Ayodhya dispute to sort the matter outside Court.

Hearing a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court said the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya is an issue of sentiment and religion. The Court said, “The matter involves sentiments on both sides. It should be settled amicably between the disputing parties … The Supreme Court will come in the picture if you can’t settle the dispute outside the Court.”

In his plea, the BJP leader said numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement had failed and a judicial intervention was required. Swamy was told to mention the case on March 31.


The Ayodhya dispute

The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical, and socio-religious debate in India. It is centred on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around

  1. access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Rama,
  2. the history and location of the Babri Mosque at the site,
  3. and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished or modified to create the mosque.

The Ram Janmabhoomi debate climaxed on 6 December 1992 when a mob tore down the disputed 16th-century Babri mosque in Ayodhya claiming it to be the birthplace of Rama. The following months saw the most brutal Hindu-Muslim riots of post-Partition India, killing at least 2,000 and displacing many more.

Relying on evidence provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, three judges of the Allahabad High Court issued a landmark judgement on the dispute in September 2010. The Court ruled that the land be divided into 3 parts, with

  1. 1/3 for the construction of the Ram temple,
  2. 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board,
  3. and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination called Nirmohi Akhara.

While the verdict was not unanimous over whether the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, the Court said that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site.

In 2010, the Supreme  Court had put a freeze on the judgment by the Allahabad High Court. The Ram Mandir case has been pending before the apex court for over six years.


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Ayodhya Case Supreme Court

Ayodhya Case: Supreme Court Orders Mediation With A 3-Member Panel

shiv sena ram mandir

Maharashtra: With Cries Of ‘Ram Mandir’ On Lips, 2000 Shiv Sena Workers Head To Ayodhya

name changes yogi adityanath

Faizabad District Renamed As Ayodhya; Yogi’s Name-Changing Spree Continues Unabated

Yogi Adityanath Ram Statue

Yogi Adityanath Confirms Building Ram Statue In Ayodhya; UP Govt Starts Process To Build It

India, Pakistan Agree To Resolve Issue Of Alleged Harassment Of Diplomats

Adeela Rabeeh Abdulla

This IAS Officer & Her Team Help Resolve Disputes Between Elderly Parents & Their Children

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

For The First Time, Transgenders In Kerala Could Choose Their Gender Identity During Voting

News

PepsiCo Sues Farmers For Growing Lays Variety Potatoes, Demands Rs 1.05 Crore Each

Environment

Greenpeace Activists Sail Across The World With ‘Plastic Monsters’ To Return Them Home To Nestlé

Environment

Meet The Pune Man Who Volunteered With 60 Social Groups & NGOs For Various Social Causes

Awareness

White-Topping Of Bengaluru Roads: Did It Curb Pothole Menace Or Cause Traffic Congestion?

Get Inspired

Girl Who Fled Home To Escape Child Marriage, Scores 90% In Karnataka Pre-University Boards

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.