SC Asks Parties To Resolve Ayodhya Dispute Outside Court; Know About It

The Logical Indian Uttar Pradesh

March 21st, 2017 / 12:49 PM

Ayodhya Dispute

Source: India Today | Image Courtesy: Nitin Rai | National Dastak

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today asked the parties involved in the Ayodhya dispute to sort the matter outside Court.

Hearing a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court said the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya is an issue of sentiment and religion. The Court said, “The matter involves sentiments on both sides. It should be settled amicably between the disputing parties … The Supreme Court will come in the picture if you can’t settle the dispute outside the Court.”

In his plea, the BJP leader said numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement had failed and a judicial intervention was required. Swamy was told to mention the case on March 31.


The Ayodhya dispute

The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical, and socio-religious debate in India. It is centred on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around

  1. access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Rama,
  2. the history and location of the Babri Mosque at the site,
  3. and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished or modified to create the mosque.

The Ram Janmabhoomi debate climaxed on 6 December 1992 when a mob tore down the disputed 16th-century Babri mosque in Ayodhya claiming it to be the birthplace of Rama. The following months saw the most brutal Hindu-Muslim riots of post-Partition India, killing at least 2,000 and displacing many more.

Relying on evidence provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, three judges of the Allahabad High Court issued a landmark judgement on the dispute in September 2010. The Court ruled that the land be divided into 3 parts, with

  1. 1/3 for the construction of the Ram temple,
  2. 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board,
  3. and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination called Nirmohi Akhara.

While the verdict was not unanimous over whether the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, the Court said that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site.

In 2010, the Supreme  Court had put a freeze on the judgment by the Allahabad High Court. The Ram Mandir case has been pending before the apex court for over six years.


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

India, Pakistan Agree To Resolve Issue Of Alleged Harassment Of Diplomats

Adeela Rabeeh Abdulla

This IAS Officer & Her Team Help Resolve Disputes Between Elderly Parents & Their Children

volleyball india

Volleyball India Suspended Because Of Internal Dispute; Future Of The Sport Uncertain

Income Of National Parties

[Watch] The Income Of National Parties In India From Unknown Sources. Know About It

All You Need To Know About South China Sea Dispute, Which Hold Huge Oil And Gas Reserves Beneath Its Seabed

Despite Cauvery Water Dispute, Bengaluru Wastes Nearly 50% Of The Water It Receives From The River

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

“No Guarantee From France On Rafale But A Letter Of Comfort Issued”: Govt To Supreme Court

Sponsored

On Children’s Day, The Story Of Menaka Stephen, Who Rose From Slums To Become A Beacon Of Hope For Underprivileged Kids

News

Punjab: Amritsar Train Tragedy Didn’t Teach A Lesson As Devotees Stand On Railway Tracks During Chhath Puja

News

[Video] Peon Stitched Patient’s Wounds While Doctor Sat Nearby In Haryana Govt Hospital

News

Garima Arora Becomes First Indian Woman To Get The Coveted Michelin Star

News

Statue Building Spree: Karnataka Govt To Build 125 Ft Statue Of Mother Cauvery Costing Rs 1200 Cr

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.