SC Asks Parties To Resolve Ayodhya Dispute Outside Court; Know About It

The Logical Indian Uttar Pradesh

March 21st, 2017 / 12:49 PM

Ayodhya Dispute

Source: India Today | Image Courtesy: Nitin Rai | National Dastak

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today asked the parties involved in the Ayodhya dispute to sort the matter outside Court.

Hearing a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court said the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya is an issue of sentiment and religion. The Court said, “The matter involves sentiments on both sides. It should be settled amicably between the disputing parties … The Supreme Court will come in the picture if you can’t settle the dispute outside the Court.”

In his plea, the BJP leader said numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement had failed and a judicial intervention was required. Swamy was told to mention the case on March 31.


The Ayodhya dispute

The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical, and socio-religious debate in India. It is centred on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around

  1. access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Rama,
  2. the history and location of the Babri Mosque at the site,
  3. and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished or modified to create the mosque.

The Ram Janmabhoomi debate climaxed on 6 December 1992 when a mob tore down the disputed 16th-century Babri mosque in Ayodhya claiming it to be the birthplace of Rama. The following months saw the most brutal Hindu-Muslim riots of post-Partition India, killing at least 2,000 and displacing many more.

Relying on evidence provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, three judges of the Allahabad High Court issued a landmark judgement on the dispute in September 2010. The Court ruled that the land be divided into 3 parts, with

  1. 1/3 for the construction of the Ram temple,
  2. 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board,
  3. and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination called Nirmohi Akhara.

While the verdict was not unanimous over whether the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, the Court said that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site.

In 2010, the Supreme  Court had put a freeze on the judgment by the Allahabad High Court. The Ram Mandir case has been pending before the apex court for over six years.


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by :

Related Stories

Supreme Court Verdict Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi

Read: Full-Text Of The Supreme Court Verdict On Ayodhya Land Dispute

Supreme Court Verdict Ayodhya Ram Janmabhoomi

Ayodhya Final Verdict: Supreme Court Awards Disputed Land To Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, Alternative Land For Mosque

India, Bangladesh, Border Security Force, Jawan, Fishing, Dispute

Bangladeshi Guards Kill BSF Jawan Over Fishing Dispute At The Border

Tamil Nadu Water Crisis

Frantic Desperation As Water Crisis Worsens: Woman Stabbed By Neighbour Over Water Dispute In Tamil Nadu

Controlling air and water pollution is one of the major promises made by almost all the political parties. Photo by CIAT/Flickr.

Environmental Issues Get Into Parties Manifestos: Know Which Party Has Promised What

Ayodhya Case Supreme Court

Ayodhya Case: Supreme Court Orders Mediation With A 3-Member Panel

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

Is Delhi Air Choking You? Now Buy Oxygen Starting Rs 299 At This Bar

News

Assam Police Takes Care Of Kids While Their Mothers Appear For Examination

News

India To Become 10 Trillion Dollar Economy In Next 15 Years: Defence Minister Rajanth Singh

Get Inspired

To Raise Funds For Prostate Cancer, UK Athlete Runs Marathon In All 196 Countries In World

Fact Check

Fact Check: Did The Statue Of Unity Really Earn Thrice As Much As The Taj Mahal?

News

1396 URLs Spreading Child Abuse Openly Available On Twitter: Report

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.