SC Asks Parties To Resolve Ayodhya Dispute Outside Court; Know About It

The Logical Indian

March 21st, 2017

Ayodhya Dispute

Source: India Today | Image Courtesy: Nitin Rai | National Dastak

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today asked the parties involved in the Ayodhya dispute to sort the matter outside Court.

Hearing a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court said the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya is an issue of sentiment and religion. The Court said, “The matter involves sentiments on both sides. It should be settled amicably between the disputing parties … The Supreme Court will come in the picture if you can’t settle the dispute outside the Court.”

In his plea, the BJP leader said numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement had failed and a judicial intervention was required. Swamy was told to mention the case on March 31.

The Ayodhya dispute

The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical, and socio-religious debate in India. It is centred on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around

  1. access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Rama,
  2. the history and location of the Babri Mosque at the site,
  3. and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished or modified to create the mosque.

The Ram Janmabhoomi debate climaxed on 6 December 1992 when a mob tore down the disputed 16th-century Babri mosque in Ayodhya claiming it to be the birthplace of Rama. The following months saw the most brutal Hindu-Muslim riots of post-Partition India, killing at least 2,000 and displacing many more.

Relying on evidence provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, three judges of the Allahabad High Court issued a landmark judgement on the dispute in September 2010. The Court ruled that the land be divided into 3 parts, with

  1. 1/3 for the construction of the Ram temple,
  2. 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board,
  3. and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination called Nirmohi Akhara.

While the verdict was not unanimous over whether the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, the Court said that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site.

In 2010, the Supreme  Court had put a freeze on the judgment by the Allahabad High Court. The Ram Mandir case has been pending before the apex court for over six years.

Share your thoughts..

Propelled by


This Women’s Day Spread The Message Of Equality

Related Stories

Cauvery Verdict: Supreme Court Asks Karnataka To Release 177.25 TMC Of Water To Tamil Nadu


Medical Colleges Admission Scam: CJAR To Challenge SC Order On No Investigation Of Sitting Judges In India


Bengaluru: Locals Clash With The Army Over Disputed Land Where 113-Year Old Mosque Is Located

Justice Dipak Misra Sworn In As 45th Chief Justice Of India: Know About Him

This Man Gave Up A Part Of His House For A Temple And Prays Every Day With People From A Different Faith  

Rape Case

Rape Case Cannot Be Revoked Even If The Accused Marries Victim: Karnataka HC

Latest on The Logical Indian


Arizona: Self Driving Uber Kills Pedestrian; Company Suspends Testing In Four Locations


Families Of 39 Killed In Iraq Found About The Deaths On TV, Question Swaraj On False Hopes


Gujarat: 11-Year-Old Rape Victim Gives Birth To Child With Paralysis, Struggling To Survive


Cheaper American Chicken Legs Soon To Enter Indian Market & Strip 40% Profits Of Poultry Industry


Rajasthan: Visually Impaired Man Knocked On Govt’s Door For Five Years To Get A Road Built In His Village


Last Male Northern White Rhino Dies; Subspecies Now Survived Only By 2 Female White Rhinos