Is It Justified To Give ‘Y’ Security Cover To Arnab Goswami From Taxpayers’ Money, Who Can Afford It On His own?

Koshika Mira Saxena

October 18th, 2016

Arnab Goswami Security

Image Courtesy: twimg

[Update: Arnab Goswami has refuted the news that he was being provided Y-Category security cover from the Union government following threats from terror groups. You can read the full report here]

As per the report of Hindustan Times, Arnab Goswami, the editor-in-chief of news channel Times Now, will be given Y category security, which means that 20 security guards and 2 personnel security officers will be with him round the clock after the Intelligence Bureau allegedly intercepted a message from Pakistan-based terror groups carrying threats against Mr Goswami.


Social Media Outburst
There is a debate going on social media with people voicing over the fact that the issue of security threat to Arnab Goswami has been exaggerated and it is futile to provide him security guards.


Tax Payers’ Money
Arnab Goswami, a journalist, known for his aggressive and dominating ways in the world of media, is an opinionated, argumentative, interrupting host. Let’s just ponder over the fact that how much it is legitimate to provide security cover to Goswami? 20 security guards will follow him day and night but who will be paying those guards? Who will be responsible for paying salaries to them?

Obviously, the government will pay the security guards from the taxes we pay, so indirectly the taxpayers’ money will be spent on the security of a journalist. At the same time, our country lacks resources when it comes to basic security so the security being provided to him could be put to better use in those sectors which are under stressed since the government funds seem to fall short.

Arnab Goswami is a renowned journalist then why isn’t he asked to pay from his own pocket. Being editor-in-chief of Times Now, he must be in a position to pay the amount. He can also hire private security guards, or he may urge his employer to provide him with a security 24*7. If he couldn’t have afforded the security, then govt. should provide security.


Those Who Needed Security Were Not Provided

Looking back at the Vyapam Scam, the whistleblowers Anand Rai and Ashish Chaturvedi were asked to pay for security from their own pockets. Anand Rai, an Indore-based doctor, filed a PIL to investigate in the scam. He asked the court to provide him security since he was receiving regular threat calls. He was asked to pay Rs 50,000 per month for security while his monthly income was Rs 38,000. Ashish Chaturvedi, the other whistleblower, was asked by police to pay Rs 50,000 or remain confined in his home. This happened with them the threat was real and 25 people who were related to Vyapam Scam were killed.

An observation made by Scroll is important to highlight:

“In almost all the other 22 instances of journalists who were killed since 2010, there was fair warning. The threat perception was very, very real. FIRs were lodged naming the persons they feared would attack them. Convictions, with one exception (where an appeal is pending), are nil.

And yet, they had zero security.”

While another journalist like Sudhir Chaudhary from Zee News was provided X security, Samachar Plus’s Umesh Kumar was provided Y-category, and Ashwini Kumar Gupta was provided Z-plus category by the government. Why the special treatment for them, should the government spend taxpayers’ money on anyone who can afford his own security?

 

 

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Special Security

475 VIPs, Highest Ever, Are About To Get Special Security; Govt Looking To Trim List

Bhopal Jail Outbreak

80 Guards Supposed To Be At Jail Were On VIP Duty During The Bhopal Jail Outbreak

Govt Officers Taking Benefits Even After Retirement

How 5 Govt Officers In Delhi Are Still Taking Benefits Of Their Service Tenure Even After Years Of Retirement

[Video] MP Mahesh Sharma’s Staff Beats Security Guards For Stopping His Car

Home gaurds

Maharashtra: Home Guards Not Paid For Over 6 Months, Forced To Work Like Bonded Labourer

neeta-ambani

Neeta Ambani Is Not Wrong In Asking Security, But Is The Government Right In Providing Her The Same?

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

3 Men Attacked By Mob For Refusing “Virginity Test” On Brides

News

Kerala: Deplorable Elephant Parade Again, Police Allegedly Keep Mum

My Story

MyStory : “I Just Taught Them A Subject, But They Taught Me Many Inspirational Lessons Through Their Life”

News

Kolkata: Scooter Rider Beaten To Death By Civic Police Volunteers For Not Wearing Helmet

News

With 11 Journalists Killed In 2017, India Goes Further Down On International Press Freedom Ranking

News

Not Just Sreejith, This Man From Kerala Has Also Been Protesting Over A Year For His Daughter’s Death