False, Unsubstantiated & Frivolous Allegations: Alok Verma On His Ouster As CBI Chief
Image Credit: The Indian Express
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Linkedin
  • Print
  • koo
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Linkedin
  • Print
  • koo
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Linkedin
  • Print
  • koo

On January 10, just within 48 hours of the reinstation of Alok Verma to the post of CBI Chief, he was removed by a PM-led panel. Verma has now been posted as the Director-General Fire Services, Civil Defence and Home Guards, under the Union Ministry.


“False, unsubstantiated and frivolous allegations”

Alok Verma in response to his transfer has said that the action taken by the committee was based on “false, unsubstantiated and frivolous allegations” made by only one person inimical to him, as reported by The Times of India. Verma says that he stood up for the integrity of the institution and given a chance, would do it again.

The panel which took the decision consisted of PM Modi, Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge and SC judge Justice AK Sikri. The eviction was done on the basis of 2:1 majority, with Kharge being the lone dissenting member.


Reinstation by SC

On January 8, the exiled CBI Chief Alok Verma was reinstated to the post by the Supreme Court. Verma was sent on a “compulsory wait” on October 23 on the orders of the government of India. After this, Verma challenged the government’s orders, saying that a CBI Chief has a fixed tenure of two years, removal of whom would happen only under extraordinary circumstances with approval from a high-powered committee. Notably, Verma’s tenure was to end on January 31. The Supreme Court bench which gave this judgement on the reinstation comprised of three judges who took a unanimous decision of the quashing the centre’s order. The three judges said, “The legislative intent of insulating the CBI director is manifest.”

Notably, reinstating Verma to the post came with its own set of conditions. The SC had directed the government to form a committee, consisting of the Prime Minister, the Chief Justice and the leader of the Opposition to see if any action is required to be taken against Verma. Until then, CBI Chief was not permitted to take any major policy decision. The committee was asked to meet within a week.

Finance minister Arun Jaitley, post the SC ruling said that the decision to send Verma and his deputy Rakesh Asthana on compulsory wait was based on the recommendations of Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), as reported by NDTV. “The government felt that in the larger interest of fair and impartial investigation and credibility of CBI, the two officers must recuse themselves,” he added. He also added that with this decision, the court has strengthened the immunity given to the CBI director and it is in the interest of impartial working of CBI. “At the same time, the court has devised an accountability mechanism. The directions of the court will obviously be complied with,” he further said.


Decision to send the warring officials on leave

This decision of sending the two officials (Verma and Asthana) on leave came at the midnight with Joint Director of CBI, M Nageshwar Rao was then given the temporary in-charge. The decision came after the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) passed an order seeking their removal.

Both were stripped of all their responsibilities then. There were reports of Alok Verma’s offices being sealed and searched at, however, CBI later issued a clarification saying that no office has been sealed.


Also Read: CBI Director Sent On A Leave In A Dramatic Midnight Move By Modi Govt

Contributors Suggest Correction
Editor : The Logical Indian

Must Reads