Disqualified AAP MLAs Don’t Have Right To Oral Hearings, Says Election Commission

The Logical Indian Crew

February 23rd, 2018 / 6:09 PM

Courtesy: Indian Express | Image Credits: News18, India Today

On Thursday, in reply to Delhi High Court’s petition, the Election commission denied the accusations that they had violated the principles of natural justice in the case of disqualified AAP legislatures. They rejected any allegations by stating that the MLAs didn’t have “right to the audience” with the commission since they have been disqualified.

The dismissed AAP MLAs presented their appeal challenging the Presidential orders that alleged them of holding offices under the Delhi government as “parliamentary secretaries” in front of bench including justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Chander Shekhar.

Amit Sharma, the Election Commission’s counsel, said, “Oral hearing is but one of the tenets of principles of natural justice.  I asked them to come and represent, make their submissions, make their plea, I, in fact, am conscious of the principles of natural justice. The degree of the test of the principle of natural justice will be different in cases when the trial takes place and different in cases like these, as per my view.”  

The EC argued that they have fulfilled the rules of natural justice by allowing AAP legislatures to make written submissions in their defence.


The principles of natural justice state that:

  • No one should be made a judge of his case.
  • Hear the other party or the rule of fair hearing or the practice that no one should be condemned unheard.

Sharma also told that AAP MLA’s were given sufficient opportunity and that they have submitted detailed answers to the case. “This is not a case of no-opportunity, this is a case of sufficient opportunity. There is no right to the audience in all cases. Parties can be heard through written submissions also,” he added.

The counsel pointed out the notices issued to the MLAs and made accusations that they were doing all this to lengthen the proceedings and that they were willingly avoiding being part of the commission’s proceedings. The next hearing will take place on 26 February.

Since the laws of natural justice allow any form of representation, the plea of AAP legislatures that they were denied oral hearing by the Election commission fails because they were given ample opportunity to provide defend themselves through written submissions.

The EC’s counsel argued that this was a case of sufficient opportunity since the MLAs were the one that didn’t show up in the EC’s proceedings making it an extended argument.

 


Contributors

Written by :

Edited by : Pooja Chaudhuri

Related Stories

Pre-School Written Oral Exam

No Child In Pre-School Should Be Made To Take Oral Or Written Exam: NCERT

Women Right Terminate Pregnancy

Women Don’t Have Absolute Right To Terminate Pregnancy: Centre To SC

SSC/EC/WSES Unfair Treatment

Why MPs/MLAs Get Benefit Of Pensions & Other Perks But Ex-Short Service Commission Officers Don’t

AAP MLAs Lokayukta

50 AAP MLAs Refuse To Declare Assets To Lokayukta, Say There Is No Law Prescribing It

AAP mlas president

President Kovind Dismisses Petition To Disqualify 27 AAP MLAs In Office Of Profit Case

Delhi CS Assault Case: Charge Sheet Filed Against Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia And 11 AAP MLAs

Latest on The Logical Indian

Fact Check

Fact Check: Right Wing Portal Claims Nidhi Razdan Attended Pakistan-Sponsored Event, Did She?

News

Uttarakhand: Despite High Court Order, Private Ayurvedic Colleges Continue With 170% Fee Hike

News

Bengaluru Police: Don’t Pay Fine, Buy A Helmet And Take Your Vehicle Home

Environment

TN Collector Organises Eco-Friendly Wedding, Sets Example To Minimise Plastic And Paper Waste

Fact Check

Fact Check: Whether Price Hike Rollback Of JNU Is Indeed A Major One?

News

India Pledges To Donate $5 Million To Palestinian Refugees In 2020

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.