Cannot Implicate A Man As A Terrorist Merely Because He Has Seen Certain Videos And Speeches

From our friends at
Live Law
ASHOK K.M
Kerala

May 13th, 2018 / 3:06 PM

Image Source | Deccan Chronicle

The fact that he has seen certain videos and speeches as aforesaid by itself will not be a reason to implicate him as a terrorist unless there are other materials to establish the same, the bench said.

The Kerala High Court, in a judgment delivered last month, has observed that a person cannot be implicated as a terrorist, merely because he has seen certain videos and speeches.

The division bench of Justice AM Shaffique and Justice P Somarajan made this observation while allowing an appeal filed by an accused challenging the order passed by NIA court refusing to grant bail.

Before the high court, the accused submitted that it is only on account of the matrimonial dispute or under the influence of some other persons his wife made such allegations against him. It was contended that, though laptops were recovered by the NIA, other than a folder containing videos, speeches one Zakhir Naik, many other Muslim leaders and organizations, no other evidence has been upcoming regarding the alleged terror link.
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) told the court that his laptop contained some nude photographs and videos of the girl apart from the certain literature regarding the Jihad movement and videos.

The bench observed that the issue relating to the nude photographs of the girl etc. are separate matters which have to be dealt with by the procedure prescribed.
Setting aside the NIA court order, the bench granted him bail and observed: “As far as the appellant is concerned, he is detained on the ground that he might have involved in terrorism. The fact that he has seen certain videos and speeches as aforesaid by itself will not be a reason to implicate him as a terrorist unless there are other materials to establish the same. Many of such videos, speeches etc are in public domain. Merely for the reason that one sees such matters it may not be possible for any person to establish that the accused is involved in terrorism. In the absence of any such materials forthcoming, even as on date, after expiry of 70 days of imprisonment, we are of the view that this is a fit case in which this Court should exercise jurisdiction to grant bail.”

Read more at: LiveLaw


Also published on Medium.

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

Telecom Social Media Apps

Govt Needs Your View To Block Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter Under Certain Conditions

Plastic In Kurkure

PepsiCo Sues Facebook, Twitter And YouTube Over ‘Plastic In Kurkure’ Videos, Delhi HC Orders Videos To Be Taken Down

Nalanda Medical College Hospital Flooded

Patna: Second Largest Hospital Flooded, Fishes And Insects Seen In The ICU

My Story: I Feel Bad When She Cries But I Have Seen Her Crying In The Night Because Of Me

Govt Officials Speech Hindi

From Now On, Govt Officials Who Know Hindi Will Be Required To Give Speeches Only In Hindi

Citizenship Act

Govt. Mulling Over The Idea To Make It Easier For Refugees Of Certain Religions To Become Citizens

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

DUSU President Used Fake Certificates To Get Admission In Delhi University, NSUI Alleges

My Story

My Story: She Came To City To Beg; There Are Many Like Her Who Are Thrown Out Or Made To Leave Their Houses

News

BJP MP Babul Supriyo Threatens To Break A Man’s Leg At Event For Differently Abled; Later Says He Was Joking

News

More Than 50% Of Mumbai-Chennai Highway Is Unsafe: Report

News

TN BJP Head Claims Auto Driver Beaten Up Was Drunk, Visits His House To ‘Apologise’ With Sweets

News

Out Of Rs 336 Cr, UP Govt Has Not Spent Single Penny For Mothers Under PM’s Maternity Scheme: RTI

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.