Brother Cannot Claim The Property Inherited By His Sister From Her In-Laws: Supreme Court

The Logical Indian

February 15th, 2017 / 6:14 PM

Brother Cannot Claim Property Inherited By Sister

Source: indianexpress | Image Source: netdna

The Supreme Court (SC) in a recent order declared that a man does not have the right to claim the property inherited by his sister from her husband. This is because the brother can neither be considered to be her heir nor her family.

“Language used in Section 15 clearly specifies that the property inherited from the husband and father-in-law would devolve upon the heirs of husband/father-in-law from whom she inherited the property,” the bench of Justices Dipak Misra and R Banumathi said.

The apex court was referring to the provision laid by the Hindu Succession Act which lays down the general order of succession to the property of a female intestate (a person who has died without making a will) who dies after the commencement of this law.

The SC was hearing the appeal filed by a man challenging the March 2015 verdict of the Uttarakhand High Court holding him to be an unauthorised occupant in a property in Dehradun in which his deceased, married sister was a tenant.

The bench noted that the property was taken on rent in 1940 by the father-in-law of the woman (the man’s sister) and after that, the woman’s husband became its tenant. After the death of her husband, she became the tenant of the property.

“….the first appellate court and the High Court rightly held that the appellant (Durga Prasad) is neither an heir as visualized under section 3(a) of the UP Act XIII of 1972 (the UP Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act), nor family within the meaning of section 3(g) of the Act and that the appellant is in unauthorized occupation of suit premises and is liable to be evicted,” the bench said.

“Upon the death of Lalita (sister), in terms of section 15(2)(b) of the Hindu Succession Act, in the absence of any son or daughter of deceased Lalita, the tenancy would devolve upon the heirs of her husband,” the apex court said. “In the facts of present case, the appellant being the brother of a deceased tenant cannot be held to be the family as the inclusive list given under the Act clearly omits brother and sister and the same cannot be read therein as the list has to be read and interpreted strictly.” 


Contributors

Edited by :

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

SCST Quota Supreme Court

Cannot Claim SC/ST Benefits In Second State Unless Caste Notified There: Supreme Court

NDMA Floods

Floods Might Claim 16,000 Lives & Rs 47,000 Cr Property In Next 10 Yrs: NDMA Report

Second Marriage Joint Property

Children From Second Marriage Cannot Claim Share In Ancestral Joint Family Property: Bombay HC

The Truth Behind Chhattisgarh Farmer’s Claim Of Her Income Getting Doubled And ABP News Refuting Her Claim

This Brother & Sister Are Trying To Create A Wasteless World By Educating The Younger Generation

[Watch/Read] Her Sister Told Her To Run, But They Held Her Down And Poured Acid On Her Face

Latest on The Logical Indian

News

UP: Police Kills Two In An Encounter, Journalists Allegedly “Invited” To Film The Incident

My Social Responsibility

This Mumbai Man Is Bringing Volunteers To Collect Broken Ganesh Idols Left At Sea Beaches After Immersion

News

Is Defence Minister Right About Incapability Of HAL To Produce Rafale Jets?

Awareness

The Ground Realities Of An ‘Ideal Village’ In Bihar’s State Capital

News

Number Of Infant Deaths At Five-Yr Low In India, But Still Remain Highest In The World: UN Report

My Social Responsibility

This Team Reduced 4.2 Tonnes Of Carbon Footprint By Replacing Plastic In School Experiment Kits

x

Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.