The death of 31-year-old Rishikesh Kumar, an MSc Physics student at IIT Delhi, has sparked protests on campus, with students demanding an independent investigation, resignations of senior officials and ₹1 crore compensation for his family.
Kumar died on August 22 after falling from the sixth floor of the Lecture Hall Complex; police said no suicide note was recovered and are investigating the circumstances.
Students allege that difficulties over hostel accommodation, academic projects, medical documentation and what they call “moral profiling” by the Student Affairs Office left Kumar isolated and without adequate institutional support.
IIT Delhi has rejected any premature conclusion about institutional responsibility and says Kumar had experienced mental-health difficulties, was advised by institute professionals to remain under parental supervision, and had sought semester withdrawals.
Following the protests and suspension of classes, Director Rangan Banerjee announced a five-member external inquiry committee, financial assistance for Kumar’s family, an external Ombudsperson and an additional faculty-student mentoring system.
A Student’s Unfinished Journey
Kumar joined IIT Delhi’s MSc Physics programme in July 2025 after securing All India Rank 40 in IIT JAM. According to people who knew him, he had performed well in his first semester.
Media reported that Kumar came from Patna, Bihar, and had given tuition classes while preparing for the entrance examination. His friends have described a sharp change in his circumstances after he developed health difficulties during the second semester.
IIT Delhi’s account says Kumar developed mental-health difficulties in March 2026 and was advised by the institute’s counsellor and psychiatrist to remain under continuous parental supervision. His request to withdraw from the second semester was approved, after which he stayed outside campus with his parents.
When he returned in July, the institute said his medical records were reviewed again and he was advised to continue staying under parental supervision. The Physics Department subsequently approved his request to withdraw from the third semester.
Students, however, say the circumstances surrounding Kumar’s return need greater scrutiny. They allege that he struggled to obtain hostel accommodation and was living outside campus with his mother. Careers360 reported students’ claims that Kumar’s name appeared on an initial Shivalik Hostel allocation list but was later removed.
They also alleged that he was unable to secure a research project. For his peers, these were not isolated administrative difficulties but part of a larger failure to provide support to a student already facing personal challenges.
Protest Puts Administration Under Scrutiny
The allegations intensified after Kumar’s death. Students gathered at the Lecture Hall Complex, held a sit-in and called for classes to be suspended, arguing that normal academic activity should not continue immediately after the death of a student.
IIT Delhi subsequently cancelled classes scheduled for August 24. Reports also said the protest grew substantially, with a PhD student claiming that more than 3,000 people had gathered at one point.
At the heart of the protest is the allegation of “moral profiling” by the Student Affairs Office. Students want the institute to explain whether Kumar’s medical history influenced decisions concerning his accommodation, academics or access to institutional resources.
They have demanded the resignation of the Dean and Associate Deans dealing with student welfare and hostel management, as well as the Head of the Physics Department. They have also called for protection from punitive action for students participating in the protests and ₹1 crore compensation for Kumar’s family.
The administration has responded by opening the matter to external scrutiny. Director Rangan Banerjee said the institute would provide financial support to Kumar’s family by reimbursing medical expenses and using its benevolent fund, while also creating a separate fund through voluntary contributions from faculty, students and staff. The institute has additionally proposed an external Ombudsperson for unresolved grievances and a faculty-student mentoring mechanism for students requiring additional mental-health support.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
A student’s death should never become an argument over which side gets the last word. The allegations raised by IIT Delhi students deserve to be heard seriously, but they must also be separated from assumptions that have not yet been established by an investigation. At the same time, an institution as prestigious as IIT Delhi has a responsibility to ensure that mental-health concerns do not become a reason for a student to feel excluded from academic opportunities, accommodation or community life.
The external committee’s two-week mandate should therefore be transparent, evidence-based and sensitive to Kumar’s family, while the administration must engage with protesting students without hostility or retaliation.
Also read: Heavy Rain Batters Delhi-NCR: 18 Flights Cancelled, 166 Delayed As Roads Flood
