Fact Check: Are Infrared Thermometers Harmful?

Supported by

As the COVID-19 pandemic rages on across the globe, governments have issued guidelines to follow for citizens as they go about their daily life. One such guideline says that regular temperature checks using contactless infrared thermal scanners at every point of a facility is essential.

In light of this, a piece of news is doing the rounds which says that infrared thermometer when pointed at one’s forehead can harm the brain especially the pineal gland.

I’d never point an infrared thermometer on my forehead… i’d never let them harm my pineal gland

— nyo taa (@nyotaxx) August 7, 2020

Similar claims about the Infrared thermometer is being shared on social media platforms in different languages.

View this post on Instagram

La asociacion de optometras me envio esta informacion. N o t a i m p o r t a n t e Si están visitando algún centro comercial y les toman la temperatura corporal con una pistola al entrar, por prudencia tápense los ojos. Muchas veces quien la usa no tienen certeza de hacia dónde apuntan. El termómetro de estos equipos funciona sobre la base de un Rayo láser que va y viene recabando la información para entonces generar la lectura, pero, se ha detectado que no todas esas pistolas están debidamente calibradas para evitar que si por error apuntan a la retina no la lastimen, vamos a cuidar nuestro sentido de la vista. Multiplica la información por favor. Saludos

A post shared by Nelson Galvis (@nelsongalvis1950) on Jun 8, 2020 at 3:11pm PDT

Importante Recomendaciones cuando en un Centro comercial te toman la temperatura y lo que debes tener de medicinas La asociacion de Optómetras envio esta informacion:

— Fanny Alayón (@fannyalayon) June 8, 2020

The Logical Indian received a request to verify the claim.

Claim:

Infrared thermometer when pointed at one’s forehead can harm the brain especially the pineal gland.

Fact Check:

The claim is false.

The claim has been rubbished by the Ministry of Health of Malaysia (Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia) on their official Facebook account.

‘Non-contact infrared thermometer is not a shooting device emitting radiation. It is designed to detect and absorb heat in the form of infrared rays emitted from the human body and converts it into electricity,’ reads the post.

Responding to the viral social media posts, Malaysian Health director-general Datuk Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah informed that the non-contact infrared thermometer was not a shooting device emitting radiation.

‘It is designed to detect and absorb heat in the form of infrared rays emitted from human body and converts it into electricity. The electronic circuit within the thermometer processes the electrical signal to determine the temperature and display the reading on a screen. Since infrared thermometers do not emit harmful radiations, it is safe to use,’ he was quoted as saying.

No such scientific evidence was found which proves that Infrared Thermometers can harm one’s brain.

According to the FDA, the federal agency that regulates drugs in the United States, the significance of non-contact infrared thermometers (NCITs) is that they reduce cross-contamination risk and minimize the risk of spreading disease.

However, the association does mention that the NCITs have certain limitations when it comes to accuracy.

Below are the limitations as listed on the FDA website:

(1) How and where the NCIT is used may affect the measurement (for example, head covers, environment, positioning on forehead).

(2) The close distance required to properly take a person’s temperature represents a risk of spreading disease between the person using the device and the person being evaluated.

Antonio Estay, an assistant professor at the University of Chile in the Department of Medical Technology, told AFP that NCIT thermometers ‘are used to measure body temperature with an infrared sensor’ and not with a laser emitter.

‘Infrared radiation can cause damage to many tissues, but this is not the case with thermometers,’ he said when asked if these thermometers are harmful since NCITs do not emit energy.

According to him, the sensor of the thermometer only measures electromagnetic radiation emitted by the user, it does not generate it.

Further, the Puerto Rican Society of Ophthalmology took to Facebook to debunk these claim and quoted ophthalmologist Vanessa López as saying that, ‘Are the infrared thermometers we are using to measure temperature dangerous for vision? The answer is NO. The thermometers to which we are exposed in different locations work as a sensor that reads the infrared waves that all humans naturally emit. The thermometer uses light, not a laser, which points the direction of the sensor where the temperature measurement will be taken.’

If you have any news that you believe needs to be fact-checked, please email us at factcheck@thelogicalindian.com or WhatsApp at 6364000343.

Also Read: Fact Check: Twitter Mourns Death Of A Person Who Is Alive, Fake Account Spins A Dubious Tale

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

P&G Shiksha

P&G Shiksha Turns 20 And These Stories Say It All

Amplified by

Isha Foundation

Sadhguru’s Meditation App ‘Miracle of Mind’ Hits 1 Million Downloads in 15 Hours, Surpassing ChatGPT’s Early Growth

Recent Stories

Meet Deepak Kumar, 22: Once a National Athletic Champion, Now Selling Sugarcane Juice on Fazilka’s Streets Despite 16 Medals

Kolkata Law Student Gang-Rape: 55-Year-Old Security Guard Among 4 Arrested; CCTV Footage Key as Campus Safety Faces Scrutiny

Neeraj Chopra Breaks 90m, Reclaims World No. 1 Javelin Ranking, Surpassing Anderson Peters in 2025

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :