@nabilajamal_/X, @Saurabh_LT/X, Nitish Kumar/Facebook

Denied Tree-Cutting Permit, Bihar Authorities Build ₹100 Crore Road Curving Around Trees

A bureaucratic deadlock over forest clearance forced Jehanabad’s road project to build around trees, endangering commuters.

Supported by

A ₹100 crore road widening project on the Patna-Gaya highway in Jehanabad, Bihar, has sparked outrage as several full-grown trees were left standing in the middle of the newly constructed 7.48 km stretch. The district administration built the road around these trees after the forest department denied permission to cut them, demanding compensation for 14 hectares of forest land.

This has created hazardous zigzag driving conditions, raising safety concerns among commuters. The district administration has lodged an FIR against the construction agency for violating clearance conditions and installed barricades along the affected stretch to prevent accidents.

Dangerous Detour: Trees as Obstacles on a ₹100 Crore Road

The trees are scattered irregularly across the road rather than aligned, forcing drivers to swerve repeatedly, turning the highway into a perilous obstacle course. Local commuters and passersby have reported multiple accidents and expressed fears of more mishaps. Viral images and videos on social media have amplified criticism of the project’s flawed execution.

According to Jehanabad District Magistrate Alankrita Pandey, although no accidents have been officially reported so far, barricades have been installed as a precautionary measure. She confirmed that the construction agency proceeded with the work without obtaining the necessary forest clearance, leading to the current crisis and the FIR against them.

How Bureaucratic Deadlock Led to a Road Safety Crisis

The controversy stems from a bureaucratic impasse between the district administration and the forest department. The administration sought permission to remove the trees, but the forest department refused clearance, demanding compensation in the form of 14 hectares of non-forest land for plantation.

Unable to meet this demand, the administration allowed the road widening to continue by constructing around the trees, violating forest clearance conditions. The affected stretch was previously part of NH-83 but now falls under the state road construction department. The road widening work is currently halted pending forest department approval for tree removal.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

This incident highlights the urgent need for better coordination between government departments and adherence to environmental regulations in infrastructure projects. While development is essential, it must not come at the cost of public safety or ecological integrity.

The bizarre outcome of a ₹100 crore project turning a highway into a dangerous obstacle course underscores the consequences of bureaucratic deadlock and poor planning. The Logical Indian calls for transparent dialogue, responsible governance, and sustainable development practices that prioritise both nature and human lives.

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

P&G Shiksha

P&G Shiksha Turns 20 And These Stories Say It All

Amplified by

Isha Foundation

Sadhguru’s Meditation App ‘Miracle of Mind’ Hits 1 Million Downloads in 15 Hours, Surpassing ChatGPT’s Early Growth

Recent Stories

IndiGo Flight From Ahmedabad Reports Engine Fire Before Takeoff; All Passengers Safe

CBSE Class 12 Revaluation Results 2025 Declared: Here’s How to Check Your Scores

Supreme Court Reintroduces 2-Month Cooling-Off Period Before Arrest in Section 498A Matrimonial Cases

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :