SC Asks Parties To Resolve Ayodhya Dispute Outside Court; Know About It

Supported by

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today asked the parties involved in the Ayodhya dispute to sort the matter outside Court.

Hearing a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court said the construction of a Ram temple at Ayodhya is an issue of sentiment and religion. The Court said, “The matter involves sentiments on both sides. It should be settled amicably between the disputing parties … The Supreme Court will come in the picture if you can’t settle the dispute outside the Court.”

In his plea, the BJP leader said numerous attempts for a negotiated settlement had failed and a judicial intervention was required. Swamy was told to mention the case on March 31.

The Ayodhya dispute

The Ayodhya dispute is a political, historical, and socio-religious debate in India. It is centred on a plot of land in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. The main issues revolve around

access to a site traditionally regarded among Hindus to be the birthplace of Rama, the history and location of the Babri Mosque at the site, and whether a previous Hindu temple was demolished or modified to create the mosque.

The Ram Janmabhoomi debate climaxed on 6 December 1992 when a mob tore down the disputed 16th-century Babri mosque in Ayodhya claiming it to be the birthplace of Rama. The following months saw the most brutal Hindu-Muslim riots of post-Partition India, killing at least 2,000 and displacing many more.

Relying on evidence provided by the Archaeological Survey of India, three judges of the Allahabad High Court issued a landmark judgement on the dispute in September 2010. The Court ruled that the land be divided into 3 parts, with

1/3 for the construction of the Ram temple, 1/3 going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board, and the remaining 1/3 going to a Hindu religious denomination called Nirmohi Akhara.

While the verdict was not unanimous over whether the disputed structure was constructed after demolition of a temple, the Court said that a temple or a temple structure predated the mosque at the same site.

In 2010, the Supreme Court had put a freeze on the judgment by the Allahabad High Court. The Ram Mandir case has been pending before the apex court for over six years.

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

We Don't Have Time

When Over a Thousand Die and Millions Are Displaced, Southeast Asia’s Floods Become a Warning the World Must Not Ignore

Amplified by

Art of Living

A Calm and Relaxed Mind Is the Foundation of Creativity and Innovation

Recent Stories

FSSAI Orders Nationwide Crackdown on Adulterated Milk, Paneer and Khoya Amid Festive Season Health Fears

Bangladesh

Bangladesh Leader Threatens to ‘Cut Off Seven Sisters’ From India; Assam CM Reacts

Maharashtra

Maharashtra Farmer Forced to Sell Kidney After ₹1 Lakh Loan Spirals Into ₹74 Lakh Debt: Reports

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :