For Selling Fridge Without Guarantee Card In Clearance Sale, LG Electronics And Dealer Directed By Consumer Court To Compensate

The Logical Indian Crew Karnataka

November 20th, 2017 / 1:16 PM

Clearance sale

Courtesy: The Times of India | Image Credits: Deccan Chronicle

A consumer court in Bengaluru warned electronic goods manufacturer LG and a local dealer of the same brand after it sold a faulty refrigerator to one of its consumers saying that a “no-warranty and guarantee clearance sale” is no excuse to sell a defective product. According to a report by The Times of India, the consumer court has ordered that the product must be taken back and the customer should be fully refunded along with expenses incurred during the litigation procedure.

Unfair trade practices through clearance sale

A resident of Hoskote, Firoz Abdul Rahim bought an LG frost-free refrigerator on 12 September 2016, from a clearance sale in Maya Traders, an outlet based out of Mathikere, Bengaluru. The product was delivered without a warranty card. Rahim requested the LG dealer to give him a warranty card but his request was never met. After a month’s usage, the refrigerator began showing signs of faulty working. Rahim immediately contacted the seller, but there was no response.

He then sought the help of a local technician. To Rahim’s dismay, the technician said the main filter of the fridge was not an original LG product but it was a local substandard part. Rahim conveyed this information to Maya Traders, but it elicited no response. In November 2016, the refrigerator completely stopped functioning as its cooling system failed. The customer again visited the outlet and did not receive any positive response.

He got in touch with the LG customer care unit and they sent a technician in December. The technician said that the refrigerator was out of production and that spare parts weren’t available. The technician also told Rahim that the dealer from Mathikere had sold an LG product with assembled parts.

Lodging a complaint

Rahim contacted the showroom once again only to be told that in a clearance sale there is “no warranty and guarantee”. He then lodged a complaint against LG electronics and Maya Traders with the Bengaluru Rural and Urban 1st Additional District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum on 1 February 2017.

LG representatives failed to appear in the court in this case. The city-based dealer appeared in the court and stated that the customer was informed that products under the clearance sale don’t have any warranty or guarantee and that the company is not liable for damages.

Final judgement

The consumer court said LG Electronics India and its dealer are clearly at fault. The judges also said that clearance sale doesn’t mean that a seller can sell a defective product to the customer as there must be some value for the money paid. They said that selling a faulty product is an unfair trade practice and it is further condemnable that a major electronics brand like LG remained absent at the court hearing without answering the rightful claim made by the customer.

In the order passed on 11 October 2017, the court finally said that LG Electronics India and its dealer, Maya Traders from Mathikere, Bengaluru, were liable for selling a faulty fridge to the customer. The court further directed both the parties to jointly pay Rs 18,000 to the customer after taking back the faulty refrigerator. It also ordered the parties to pay Rs 1000 to the complainant towards litigation charges.

The Logical Indian Take

The Logical Indian urges its community members to ensure the validity of guarantee and warranty cards when they procure any item on a clearance sale. A clearance sale often is attractive owing to the heavy discounts on the items which are put up on sale. The Logical Indian urges the community members to be well assured of the product before buying it.

We condemn the actions of the LG dealer from Bengaluru. Selling a fridge with faulty assembled parts without guarantee and warranty is condemnable. It also asks the community to members to seek redressal for their grievances in consumer court of their respective areas in case, if they are going through a similar plight like Rahim from Hoskote did.

Also read, 

Telangana: District Consumer Court Orders Customer To Pay Rs 10,000 To Samsung For Defective TV

No Need To Pay Value Added Tax (VAT) On The Products Sold At Discount Rate: Consumer’s Body


Written by : Swarnami Mondal (Intern)

Edited by : Bharat Nayak

Share your thoughts..

Related Stories

SC Rafale Deal

“No Guarantee From France On Rafale But A Letter Of Comfort Issued”: Govt To Supreme Court

Delhi Court Lifts Ban On Publication And Sale Of Godman To Tycoon: The Untold Story Of Baba Ramdev

Aadhaar-PAN Benefits

Income Tax Department Launches Online Facility To Correct Aadhaar Card And PAN Card Details

Ban On Sale Of BS-III Vehicles

Supreme Court Bans the Sale of BS-III Vehicles from April 1: Know About It

Convicted Juvenile Directed To Teach Children

Bihar: Convicted Of Trading Liquor, Juvenile Directed To Teach Children And Serve Patients In Govt Hospital

Sanjay Bhandari

After Vijay Mallya, Arms Dealer Who Possessed Confidential Defense Documents Suspected To Have Fled To London

Latest on The Logical Indian


Govt Overlooks Major Concerns While Proposing New Groundwater Rules


Karnataka: Cabinet Gives Nod To Amend RTE Act; To Give First Preference To Govt Schools


Meet Meerut’s Club 60, A Group Of Senior Citizens Working Towards A Greener Environment

Get Inspired

Going Forward: After Two Trains Ran Over His Legs, This Man Found A Passion For Dancing

Fact Check

Fact Check: From Pakistan’s Flag Waved In Rajasthan To Rahul Gandhi’s U-Turn On Loan Waiver


Central Govt Spent Rs 5,245 Cr On Ads Since 2014 Says Union Minister Rajyavardhan Rathore


Stories that deserve attention, delivered to your inbox!

Handpicked, newsworthy stories which deserve the attention of a rational generation.