Land Records, Voter Lists And 15 Other Documents Don’t Prove Citizenship: Gauhati High Court

Supported by

Despite producing as many as fifteen documents including voter lists of four years, a parent’s NRC clearance, and land revenue payment receipts, the Gauhati High Court rejected a 50-year-old woman’s citizenship claims, stating that these documents cannot be used to show proof of citizenship.
Jabeda Begum alias Jabeda Khatun, from Assam’s Baksa district, was declared a “foreigner” by a Foreigners Tribunal in May 2019. Challenging the order, she had then filed a petition in the High Court. However, in an order dated February 12, a bench of Justices comprising of Manojit Bhuyan and Parthivjyoti Saikia dismissed Begum’s plea stating that she “failed to prove her linkage with her projected parents and her projected brother.”
Referring to a 2016 judgement by the same court, the HC also ruled that PAN card and bank documents cannot be used as proof of citizenship.
“This court… has already held that PAN card and bank documents are not proof of citizenship. Land revenue-paying receipts do not prove citizenship of a person. Therefore, we find that the tribunal has correctly appreciated the evidence placed before it…” the HC said.
To prove their citizenship for inclusion in National Register of Citizens(NRC), applicants had to submit documents issued before March 24, 1971, which included either their names or names of their ancestor to prove residence in Assam up to that date. Those who came to Assam after the said date have to prove their citizenship in the Foreign Tribunals.
At the tribunal, Begum had submitted 15 documents, including a certificate issued by the village chief declaring her father’s identity and her husband’s identity. Yet, her plea was dismissed.
“I spent whatever I had. Now I am left with no more resources for legal battle,” Begum toldNDTV.
Begum’s ordeal echoes the worries of several others in Assam who have failed to prove their citizenship. In the NRC exercise carried out in Assam in August last year, 19 lakh applicants (of the 3.3 crore who applied) were excluded from the final list. Across Assam, hundreds of foreigners’ tribunals have been set up to review the cases of those left out.

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

P&G Shiksha

P&G Shiksha Turns 20 And These Stories Say It All

Amplified by

Isha Foundation

Sadhguru’s Meditation App ‘Miracle of Mind’ Hits 1 Million Downloads in 15 Hours, Surpassing ChatGPT’s Early Growth

Recent Stories

Lancet Flags Alarming Vaccine Gaps in India; 1.44 Million Children Received No Immunisation in 2023

Wife, Her Lover Allegedly Plot Husband’s Murder in Aligarh; Both Arrested Within 24 Hours

Orissa HC Orders ₹2 Lakh Recovery from Tahasildar for Illegal Demolition, ₹10 Lakh Relief to Villagers

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :