The Times of India

All India Imam Organisation Chief Predicts PoK’s Reintegration with India, Calling It Imminent ‘Ghar Wapsi’

Umer Ahmed Ilyasi claims Pakistan‑Occupied Kashmir will soon rejoin India while praising Jammu & Kashmir’s transformation post-Article 370.

Supported by

Chief Imam of the All India Imam Organisation, Umer Ahmed Ilyasi, has asserted that Pakistan‑Occupied Kashmir (PoK) will “very soon” be reintegrated with India, saying its residents themselves want a referendum leading to “ghar wapsi” (homecoming). Speaking to reporters in Srinagar on April 3, 2026, Ilyasi also praised the changes in Jammu and Kashmir since the abrogation of Article 370, pointing to rising prosperity, education, and tourism.

He addressed security concerns after last year’s Pahalgam terror attack, urging visitors to return, and spoke on global conflicts, calling for peace and expressing confidence in India’s leadership to help mediate stability abroad. So far, no official response from the Indian government or diplomatic channels has been issued regarding his remarks.

‘Ghar Wapsi’ and a ‘New Kashmir’: Ilyasi’s Vision

During his media interaction in Srinagar, Ilyasi stressed that PoK is an “integral part of India” and claimed residents across the border are increasingly inclined towards integration with India. He insisted that people there are watching developments in Jammu and Kashmir and are eager to hold a referendum to rejoin India. “God willing, their ‘ghar wapsi’ will take place soon,” he said, adding that the desire for reunion is “driven by the will of the people themselves.”

Ilyasi characterised the present state of Jammu and Kashmir as a “transformed” region following the August 5, 2019 decision to revoke Article 370’s special status. He painted a picture of a Valley with improved infrastructure, booming tourism, economic growth, and a shift in youth focus from unrest to education “there was a time when young people and children used to throw stones. Today, they have pens in their hands. They are studying,” he observed.

He also referred to the recent terror attack in the Baisaran meadows in Pahalgam, which claimed around 25 lives, including tourists and a local pony handler. Acknowledging that the incident briefly dented tourism, he said the decline was temporary, and the Valley is now safe and welcoming. “I want to tell everyone that they should visit Kashmir as there is no atmosphere of fear now,” he added.

Beyond territorial claims, Ilyasi commented on international affairs, particularly wars in West Asia, describing them as destructive and harmful to all involved. He expressed hope that Prime Minister Narendra Modi would mediate progress towards peace and “tranquillity.”

PoK, Article 370 and Broader Dynamics

Ilyasi’s remarks come amid long‑standing geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan over Kashmir. Pakistan‑Occupied Kashmir, administered by Pakistan since the First Indo‑Pakistan War of 1947-48, remains a core point of dispute.

India refers to this territory as PoK and claims it as part of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir. The United Nations brokered a ceasefire in 1949 but left the region divided along the Line of Control (LoC). Neither India nor Pakistan recognises the current status as final, though international diplomatic efforts to change the status quo have been limited for decades.

The abrogation of Article 370 in 2019 by the Government of India was a watershed moment. It revoked the special constitutional status of Jammu and Kashmir, reorganised it into two Union Territories, and brought it fully under India’s central legal framework.

Supporters argue this has led to increased investment, improved governance, and strengthened national unity; critics contend it has aggravated local disenchantment, human rights concerns, and mistrust. Ilyasi’s praise of Article 370’s abrogation aligns with the former perspective and reinforces a narrative of development and normalisation.

However, independent verification of public opinion inside PoK supporting reunification or demand for a referendum under international law remains absent in credible open sources. International norms typically regard such territorial changes as subject to complex processes involving diplomatic negotiation and certified plebiscites, often under international supervision none of which have been reported in PoK.

Official Silence and Analysing the Claims

Despite the attention Ilyasi’s statements have received in the media, there has been no official comment from the Government of India, the Ministry of External Affairs, or diplomatic spokespeople in New Delhi on the claims about PoK’s future. Most news outlets reporting on his remarks clearly note this absence of government endorsement.

Analysts and commentators have previously pointed out that the views of individual leaders even prominent clerics should not be conflated with official policy. Territorial disputes like that over PoK involve strategic, legal, and diplomatic dimensions that extend far beyond the assertions of a single organisation, however influential it may be domestically.

The Indian government continues to maintain its official stance that Jammu and Kashmir, including PoK, is an integral part of India. Conversely, Pakistan maintains that the status of Kashmir should be determined through dialogue or internationally supervised plebiscite, a position longstanding since 1947. International actors, including the United Nations, generally support bilateral talks between India and Pakistan to resolve differences, emphasising peace and stability in South Asia.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

While voices like that of Umer Ahmed Ilyasi capture strong patriotic feelings and reflect deep emotional investment in Kashmir’s future, it is important to assess such assertions through lenses of peace, legality, and shared humanity. Territorial claims and aspirations whether from Kashmir, PoK, Gilgit‑Baltistan, or any disputed region must be addressed through constructive dialogue, respect for human rights, and international norms, rather than rhetoric alone.

Celebrating development in Jammu and Kashmir and encouraging tourism can genuinely uplift local economies and provide opportunities to youth. But long‑term stability in the region will depend on inclusive governance, respect for diverse identities, and diplomatic engagement that prioritises people’s well‑being over political grandstanding.

Also read: Delhi Police Raid Fake Sensodyne Toothpaste Factory, Seize 1,800 Filled Tubes and 130kg of Paste

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured

Amplified by

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

From Risky to Safe: Sadak Suraksha Abhiyan Makes India’s Roads Secure Nationwide

Amplified by

P&G Shiksha

P&G Shiksha Turns 20 And These Stories Say It All

Recent Stories

Delhi Police Raid Fake Sensodyne Toothpaste Factory, Seize 1,800 Filled Tubes and 130kg of Paste

AP Home Invasion: 35‑Yr‑Old Govt Worker Raped, Iron Rod Assaulted; Police Launch Massive Search for Accused

Iran Claims to Have Shot Down US Fighter Jet Near Qeshm Island, One Pilot Rescued as War Escalates

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :