Taipei is urgently seeking assurances from the United States that the favourable terms of its recently concluded tariff agreements will remain intact despite significant disruption caused by a U.S. Supreme Court verdict that struck down broad emergency tariff powers used by President Donald Trump.

On February 24, 2026, Taiwan’s Vice-Premier Cheng Li-chiun emphasised that the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) which commits the U.S. to lower tariffs on Taiwanese exports from 20 % to 15 % in return for massive Taiwanese investment must not be undermined. The original pact included US $250 billion of Taiwanese investment in semiconductors, energy and artificial intelligence in the U.S., with the Taiwanese government guaranteeing another US $250 billion in credit support.

Cheng said dialogue with Washington remains “positive” and the agreement will stand even as legal uncertainty reverberates. Simultaneously, Trump has warned other countries against backing away from deals and signalled broader tariff threats under alternative trade laws, heightening global unease. The situation has also impacted markets across Asia, with Indian equities rising after the court ruling invalidated many of the former tariffs.

Taipei Seeks Clarity Amid Tariff Turmoil

Taiwan’s Vice-Premier Cheng told reporters in Taipei that the Supreme Court’s decision does not alter existing preferential treatment afforded to Taiwanese products under ART, particularly for semiconductors, auto parts, aircraft components and other key exports.

She noted that the ART signed in mid-February includes most-favoured-nation treatment under Section 232 tariffs and exemptions for over 2,000 Taiwanese products, which Taiwan regards as critical to protecting its export competitiveness.

Cheng clarified that Taiwan is not seeking to reopen or renegotiate the pact, but rather wants explicit U.S. commitment that the beneficial terms negotiated in good faith will endure even if Washington is obliged to use other legal trade instruments following the court ruling. She stressed that countries with existing bilateral agreements “should have a relatively advantageous foundation” when navigating any new tariff tools the U.S. might adopt.

Her comments come amid rising domestic debate. The main opposition Kuomintang (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have argued that the Supreme Court decision undermines the legal basis of the agreement and urged either renegotiation or a careful recalibration of Taiwan’s commitments.

Critics contend that because the reciprocal tariff cuts were linked to emergency powers now invalidated, Taipei should reassess the deal to ensure legal sturdiness and economic benefit. The ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), however, has defended the pact as still viable and stresses flexibility in engaging with Washington on changes.

U.S. Supreme Court Shakes Global Trade

The legal disruption stems from a U.S. Supreme Court decision that found Trump had exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) by imposing broad tariff levies without clear congressional mandate, striking them down as unlawful.

In direct response, Trump quickly introduced a temporary 15 % global tariff on imported goods using alternative trade law a move designed to maintain leverage in trade negotiations while the administration explores other legal mechanisms.

Trump’s combative messaging has amplified uncertainty: he repeatedly warned trading partners that any attempt to “play games” with U.S. deals including potentially weakening negotiated terms in the wake of the court ruling could result in “much higher tariffs or even licence fees,” posted on social media platforms. Some analysts see this as an attempt to preserve negotiating power and deter countries from leveraging the legal ruling to extract concessions.

The ruling’s fallout has extended beyond Taiwan. Asian economies, including Japan, South Korea and India, are assessing implications as U.S. trade policy appears to be in flux. India postponed a planned trade delegation to Washington due to the heightened uncertainty, reflecting broader concern among Washington’s partners. Equities in emerging markets, including India’s benchmarks, rose as investors bet that lower tariff pressures could ease cost burdens, but sharp policy shifts continue to unsettle markets.

In Europe, the European Union has also reacted strongly, emphasising that “a deal is a deal” and that U.S. tariffs on EU goods should not rise beyond agreed ceilings. Brussels has sought talks with U.S. trade representatives to clarify how existing agreements will be honoured, underlining the broader unease surrounding tariff predictability.

Taiwan’s Economic Diplomacy Tightrope Walk

Historically, Taiwan’s economic ties with the U.S. have been shaped by both economic opportunity and geopolitical context. Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, a world leader and central to the global AI supply chain, accounts for a significant share of its export growth and the lion’s share of its trade surplus with the United States.

This trade balance, while economically beneficial, carries political risk: think-tanks in Taiwan warn that a substantial surplus could make Taipei vulnerable to Section 301 investigations by the U.S. a legal pathway allowing punitive tariffs for alleged unfair trade practices. Such a move could complicate the trade landscape further if Washington chooses to pivot toward more aggressive trade enforcement.

Taiwan’s government has responded by forming a high-level economic task force to monitor developments and pursue dialogue with U.S. officials. Part of Taipei’s strategy is to clarify how other existing mechanisms including Section 232 (national security tariffs) and Section 301 might be applied so that Taiwanese exporters can plan accordingly. This reflects a nuanced awareness that even a preserved ART might not fully insulate the island from evolving U.S. trade policy.

Domestic debate also mirrors that complexity. While many business groups and policymakers support safeguarding the current deal to ensure continuity and investor confidence, some economists argue that any agreement tied to now-nullified legal foundations should be reassessed to avoid long-term ambiguity. Others oppose renegotiation, warning it could signal weakness in Taiwan’s negotiating position and erode confidence.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

The unfolding tariff uncertainty between Washington and Taipei is not just a bilateral matter it is a test of trust, rule-based cooperation and economic stability in an increasingly interconnected world. Agreements like ART are more than tariff numbers; they signify mutual commitment and predictability, foundations on which businesses base long-term investment and jobs depend. When legal or political shifts unsettle these frameworks, it is ordinary workers, exporters and consumers who often bear the brunt.

Read more: Exam Pressure Turns Fatal in UP: 49-Year-Old Man Shot Dead by Son in Lucknow