An FIR against actor Ranveer Singh in Bengaluru over his alleged mimicry of Kantara’s sacred Daiva tradition has reignited a national debate on cultural sensitivity, artistic expression and the responsibilities of influential public figures.

Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh has landed in legal trouble after an FIR was registered against him in Bengaluru for allegedly hurting religious and cultural sentiments linked to the Daiva tradition depicted in the Kannada blockbuster Kantara.

The complaint stems from Singh’s on-stage remarks and mimicry during a public appearance, which critics claim trivialised a deeply revered ritual practised in coastal Karnataka.

The FIR was registered at the High Grounds Police Station following a court directive, based on a private complaint filed by Bengaluru advocate Prashanth Methal.

The complainant alleged that Singh’s act amounted to mockery of sacred beliefs and demanded legal accountability, even as the actor had earlier issued an apology.

What the Complaint Alleges

According to the complaint, Ranveer Singh mimicked expressions and movements associated with the Daiva or Bhoota Kola tradition while referring to scenes from Kantara.

The complainant took particular objection to Singh allegedly describing the Chavundi Daiva as a “female ghost”, a phrase considered offensive by devotees and cultural practitioners.

Police officials confirmed that the FIR has been registered under relevant provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), including sections related to deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings and promote disharmony.

“The complaint has been registered as per the court’s order. We are examining the material and will proceed according to law,” a senior Bengaluru police official said, adding that no coercive action has been taken so far.

The Cultural Significance of the Daiva Tradition

The Daiva or Bhoota Kola tradition is an ancient spirit-worship practice followed primarily in the coastal districts of Karnataka, including Dakshina Kannada and Udupi.

It involves ritual performances, elaborate costumes and oral storytelling, and is believed to serve as a bridge between the divine and local communities.

Kantara, directed by and starring Rishab Shetty, brought national attention to this tradition through its climactic portrayal of Panjurli and Guliga Daiva. The film was widely praised for its authenticity and respectful depiction of folk practices, resonating deeply with Kannada audiences.

As a result, any perceived misrepresentation or casual treatment of these rituals is seen not merely as cinematic critique but as an affront to faith and identity.

Where and When the Controversy Began

The controversy traces back to an event linked to the International Film Festival of India (IFFI) in Goa, where Ranveer Singh appeared on stage alongside other film personalities.

During his address, Singh spoke animatedly about Kantara and attempted to recreate aspects of the Daiva performance, drawing laughter from some sections of the audience.

Clips from the event soon circulated widely on social media, triggering backlash from pro-Kannada groups, cultural activists and devotees.

Several organisations demanded an apology and legal action, arguing that the act reduced a sacred ritual to entertainment. What might have remained an online controversy escalated when the complaint was formally taken to court.

Ranveer Singh’s Response and Apology

Amid the growing criticism, Ranveer Singh issued a public apology, clarifying that his intention was to appreciate the power of Rishab Shetty’s performance rather than mock the tradition.

He expressed regret if his words or actions hurt anyone’s sentiments and reiterated his respect for all cultures and belief systems.

However, the complainant maintained that an apology was insufficient, arguing that public figures must be held to a higher standard of accountability.

Following this, the magistrate directed the police to register an FIR and investigate the matter, leading to the current legal proceedings.

Legal Process and What Lies Ahead

With the FIR now registered, the case has been forwarded to a magistrate court in Bengaluru, where it is expected to come up for hearing in the coming months. Legal experts note that such cases often hinge on intent, context and the interpretation of speech, particularly when artistic or performative expression is involved.

Police officials have reiterated that the investigation is at a preliminary stage. “We will look at the full context of the event, including video footage and statements, before taking further steps,” an official said. As of now, Singh has not been summoned for questioning, and no arrest has been made.

A Familiar Flashpoint: Art, Faith and Offence

This is not the first time Indian cinema or celebrities have found themselves at the centre of debates over cultural representation. From films accused of distorting history to jokes deemed offensive to religious groups, the intersection of art and faith remains fraught.

Supporters of Singh argue that the backlash reflects an intolerance of creative expression and humour, while critics insist that reverence for sacred traditions must override celebrity privilege.

The episode underscores how quickly public performances can be reframed through the lens of offence in an age of instant virality.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

At The Logical Indian, we believe that creative expression and cultural respect need not be opposing forces. Traditions like Bhoota Kola are living heritages, deserving of dignity and understanding, especially when represented on national platforms.

At the same time, dialogue, education and empathy should guide responses, rather than punitive outrage alone.

Public figures wield immense influence and must engage with cultures beyond their own with care and humility.

Equally, societies thrive when disagreements are resolved through conversation and learning, not fear or silencing.