A housing society in Noida’s Sector 99 has ignited controversy by requiring flat owners to obtain either a marriage certificate or a consent letter from family members before renting to unmarried couples. This directive, issued by V.N. Subramaniam, president of the Supreme Towers Apartment Owners Association (STAOA), comes in the wake of a tragic incident involving a 23-year-old law student who fell from the building in early January.
While some residents support this measure as a necessary safety precaution, others question its legality and effectiveness, noting that the policy has not been officially endorsed by the board.
Noida Society’s New Policy Raises Concerns
On January 31, the Supreme Towers Apartment Owners Association communicated the new requirement via email, urging immediate compliance. Subramaniam stated, “Our primary goal is to enhance security and maintain a peaceful environment for all residents.” The email specified that flat owners renting to bachelors—regardless of gender—must provide detailed information about their tenants, including family approvals. However, association secretary SS Kushwaha clarified that the policy has not been formally approved and reflects Subramaniam’s personal stance rather than an official position. This has left many residents confused about its enforceability.
Reactions among residents have been mixed. Supporters argue that the measure could help reduce disturbances commonly associated with bachelor tenants. “We need to ensure a safe environment for families,” said one resident who preferred to remain anonymous. Conversely, critics contend that the policy infringes on personal rights and privacy. “This feels like an invasion of our personal lives,” remarked another resident. Many question whether such measures will genuinely improve safety or if they merely serve to regulate tenants’ private choices.
Context of the Directive
The policy was introduced following a tragic event on January 11, when a 23-year-old law student fell to his death from the seventh floor under mysterious circumstances. This incident raised alarms over safety protocols within the community and prompted Subramaniam to propose the new measure. While some residents feel that stricter regulations are necessary, others argue that focusing on marital status or family consent does not address the underlying safety concerns.
Critics express fears that this policy may alienate certain groups and potentially lead to discrimination against unmarried individuals. “What’s next? Will we need permission for our friendships?” questioned one young tenant, highlighting concerns about personal freedoms being compromised.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
At The Logical Indian, we believe in striking a balance between safety and individual rights. While we acknowledge the legitimate concerns regarding tenant behaviour, we urge society leaders to foster open dialogue with residents rather than imposing divisive policies. Creating a secure yet inclusive environment is crucial for community well-being.
As communities navigate these complex issues, it is essential to find solutions that respect personal freedoms while ensuring safety for all residents. We invite our readers to share their thoughts: How can housing societies create safer living environments without compromising individual rights? Your insights could spark meaningful discussions about community living and tenant rights.
