@AtishiAAP/X, AI-Generated

‘Inquilab Zindabad’: Delhi Ex-CM Atishi, AAP Leaders Among 700+ Detained In Protest Against CEC

Atishi, Saurabh Bharadwaj and other protesters were detained as political and student groups gathered over SIR and demanded the CEC’s resignation.

Supported by

AAP leader and former Delhi Chief Minister Atishi was among more than 500 protesters detained by Delhi Police on October 2 during a demonstration at and around Jantar Mantar against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar.

The protest, organised by political parties, student groups and civil society activists, centred on concerns over the Election Commission’s functioning and the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, with protesters demanding Kumar’s resignation.

AAP leaders Saurabh Bharadwaj, Sanjeev Jha and Sanjay Singh were also detained or stopped from reaching the protest site, while student activists were among those taken into custody. Police said permission for the gathering had not been granted and restrictions under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) were in force across the New Delhi district. Protesters, meanwhile, maintained that their demonstration was peaceful and framed the mobilisation as a defence of voting rights and democratic accountability.

Detentions Escalate Tension

The protest unfolded amid a heavy security presence around Jantar Mantar, with barricades, traffic restrictions and restrictions on access to several nearby Metro stations. Delhi Police said around 500 people were detained from and near the protest site, although some reports put the number at more than 700 when protesters stopped at other locations were included.

Atishi, Bharadwaj, Jha and several student activists were among those detained. Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Singh was stopped at North Avenue and prevented from proceeding towards Jantar Mantar. Bharadwaj, after being detained, said the protest should continue peacefully and within the constitutional framework.

Before the demonstration, Atishi had urged people to gather at Jantar Mantar, arguing that the right to vote was central to democracy. AAP has alleged that the SIR exercise could disenfranchise legitimate voters, while the Election Commission has maintained that its electoral-roll processes are intended to identify and remove duplicate, ineligible or otherwise problematic entries.

SIR Row Fuels Protest

The October 2 mobilisation followed weeks of political and public debate surrounding the SIR exercise and allegations concerning changes to electoral rolls. Opposition parties and civil society groups have raised questions about the process and its potential impact on voters, while the Election Commission has rejected suggestions that its actions are politically motivated.

The Commission has said that decisions concerning the SIR were taken unanimously and has announced measures including door-to-door verification in certain cases and a review of voter-roll software following concerns raised publicly about the process. The controversy intensified after reports of internal discussions among election commissioners over aspects of the exercise.

The Commission has described such differences as part of institutional deliberation and maintained that the electoral process is governed by law. Against this backdrop, the demand for Kumar’s resignation has become a rallying point for several opposition and activist groups, with parallel demonstrations also planned in other parts of the country.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

Peaceful protest and open disagreement are important parts of a democratic society, particularly when citizens raise questions about an institution as fundamental as the Election Commission.

At the same time, allegations surrounding electoral rolls, voter deletions and institutional decision-making should be examined through verifiable evidence, transparent procedures and credible public explanations rather than political rhetoric alone. Authorities have a responsibility to maintain public order, while protesters and political organisations also have a responsibility to keep demonstrations peaceful and lawful.

The larger concern should be ensuring that every eligible citizen can trust the electoral process and that disagreements are addressed through dialogue, evidence and constitutional mechanisms. How can political leaders, institutions and citizens work together to protect both the right to dissent and public confidence in India’s elections?

Also Read: Neha Bora, Yogendra Yadav Among Several Detained At Jantar Mantar Protest, Internet Suspended

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Featured

Amplified by

Amazon Prime

For Two Nights in June, Mumbai’s Sea Link and Asiatic Library Wore Light Like They’ve Never Worn It Before

Amplified by

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

From Risky to Safe: Sadak Suraksha Abhiyan Makes India’s Roads Secure Nationwide

Recent Stories

What If We Turned To Our Smartphones For Relief Instead Of Distraction?

Neha Bora, Yogendra Yadav Among Several Detained At Jantar Mantar Protest, Internet Suspended

‘I Kept Reciting Hanuman Chalisa’: Captain Smit Machchhar Tells PM Modi How He Found Courage During Flydubai Crisis

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :