Oil prices extended their sharp rally on Wednesday, September 2, after renewed US-Iran strikes raised fresh concerns about disruptions to crude shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. Brent crude futures rose 87 cents, or 0.92%, to $95.52 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) gained 80 cents, or 0.89%, to $91.02.
Both benchmarks had jumped more than $4 in the previous session. The latest escalation followed US strikes on Iranian military targets on September 1 and Iran’s subsequent missile attacks on US-linked positions in the region.
The US Central Command said its operation targeted Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) air-defence sites, radar systems, maritime assets, communications facilities and mine-laying capabilities. Iran has vowed retaliation, while regional countries have also reported responding to Iranian drone activity.
The developments have heightened fears for the Strait of Hormuz, through which around 20 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products moved each day in 2025, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). With shipping already under pressure and reports of tanker attacks emerging, markets are now weighing the risk of a prolonged disruption, higher fuel costs and renewed inflation worldwide.
Oil Markets Brace For Disruption
The latest rise in crude prices reflects growing concern that the US-Iran confrontation could move beyond military exchanges and directly affect the global energy supply chain. Brent’s previous-session surge of more than $4 was its biggest one-day gain since July 24, while WTI recorded its strongest daily rise since July 23. The market’s focus is now firmly on whether commercial vessels can continue moving safely through Hormuz.
The IEA estimates that approximately 20 million barrels per day of crude oil and petroleum products passed through the waterway in 2025, accounting for around a quarter of global seaborne oil trade. The US Energy Information Administration puts the figure at about 20.9 million barrels per day during the first half of 2025. With limited alternative export routes, even a partial disruption could tighten supplies and increase prices.
The latest military escalation has added to those concerns. The US Central Command said its forces targeted Iranian capabilities that could threaten maritime security, including mine-laying equipment and maritime assets.
Washington said the strikes followed attempted Iranian attacks on commercial shipping and US personnel. Tehran, meanwhile, has continued to threaten retaliation, raising fears that the confrontation could persist rather than quickly return to negotiations.
Tanker Attacks Raise Stakes
Concerns over the safety of commercial shipping intensified after two supertankers carrying Saudi oil were reportedly struck by unknown projectiles while sailing out of the Strait of Hormuz. Reuters reported that the vessels were hit within minutes of one another off Oman, with shipping intelligence companies identifying them as ships that had loaded crude at Saudi Arabia’s Juaymah terminal. The Financial Times identified the vessels as the Saudi-owned Sidr and South Korean-owned Senegal Prosperity.
The incidents have made the threat to energy supplies more tangible for traders. A complete closure of Hormuz is not necessary to trigger a price shock. Fewer vessels sailing through the route, longer journeys, higher insurance costs, delays or fears of mines can all reduce the flow of oil and make available supplies more expensive.
Shipping activity through the strait was already showing signs of strain before the latest escalation. Al Jazeera, citing MarineTraffic data, reported that 107 transits were recorded between August 24 and August 30, down from 121 the previous week and below the roughly 130 daily transits seen before the conflict. Some vessels have also reportedly switched off their tracking systems because of concerns about attacks or interception.
The stakes extend far beyond the Gulf. China and India were among the largest destinations for crude moving through Hormuz in 2025, meaning a sustained disruption could quickly affect Asian fuel markets, import bills and inflation.
Global Economy Feels Pressure
The consequences of higher oil prices could spread through economies even if crude supplies are not completely cut off. Transport, aviation, manufacturing and petrochemical industries all depend heavily on energy, while higher fuel costs can eventually feed into the prices of goods and services.
The IEA has warned that disruptions around the Gulf can place particular pressure on diesel, jet fuel and liquefied petroleum gas markets. For central banks already balancing inflation and economic growth, another sustained oil-price surge could make interest-rate decisions more difficult.
Financial markets have already reacted to the renewed uncertainty. US shares fell in the previous session as investors assessed the combination of rising oil prices and higher bond yields. Asian markets also came under pressure on Wednesday. The concern is that prolonged geopolitical tensions could simultaneously push up energy costs, inflation and borrowing costs while weighing on economic activity.
For India, the situation is particularly significant because of its reliance on imported crude and its exposure to energy flows from the Gulf. A sustained rise in international crude prices could increase pressure on the country’s import bill and affect transport and production costs. However, the impact on consumers would depend on factors including the rupee-dollar exchange rate, refining margins, taxes and domestic fuel-pricing decisions.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
The renewed US-Iran escalation is a reminder that the consequences of conflict rarely remain confined to the battlefield. When military confrontation threatens a crucial shipping route such as the Strait of Hormuz, ordinary people thousands of kilometres away can ultimately feel its impact through fuel bills, transport costs, food prices and household expenses.
While governments have legitimate security concerns, continued retaliation risks creating a cycle in which military action increases the very economic and humanitarian pressures that diplomacy could help reduce. The Logical Indian believes that dialogue, restraint and sustained diplomatic engagement must remain central to resolving conflicts, particularly when millions of civilians and the global economy could be affected.
Also read: Chirag Paswan Receives Death Threat In Anonymous Letter, Mentions ‘Hardcore Terrorists’
