NEET UG Paper Leak
AI Generated

NEET 2026 Paper Leak: First Fast-Track Court Hearing Adjourned After CBI Counsel Skips Proceedings

India's first fast-track court for the NEET paper leak case saw its inaugural hearing postponed after no CBI counsel appeared, with bail pleas now scheduled for August 3.

Supported by

The first hearing in the NEET-UG 2026 paper leak case before Delhi’s newly designated fast-track court was adjourned on July 27 after no lawyer representing the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) appeared when proceedings began.

The hearing, centred on the bail pleas of accused Dinesh Biwal and Vikas Biwal, was postponed to August 3 after the defence also sought more time.

Special Judge Anu Grover Baliga directed the Director of Prosecution to appoint a public prosecutor for future hearings, marking an unexpected procedural setback in a court created to ensure speedy trials in paper leak cases under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024.

The development comes days after Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced fast-track courts to restore confidence in India’s examination system following nationwide outrage over the alleged NEET paper leak.

Court Hearing Delayed

The special fast-track court at Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Courts had listed the bail applications of two accused for its first hearing. However, by 10.45 am, no counsel appeared on behalf of the CBI, prompting the court to record the absence of the prosecution.

Soon afterwards, defence counsel A.P. Singh requested an adjournment, citing another matter scheduled before the Rohini district courts.

Accepting the request, Judge Baliga postponed the hearing to August 3 and instructed the Director of Prosecution to depute a public prosecutor specifically for the designated court.

The judge’s order underscored the importance of uninterrupted legal representation in a case that has become a national test of the government’s promise of swift justice. Reports also indicate that the CBI is expected to file its chargesheet in the coming days.

Separately, the court heard an application concerning the medical treatment of another accused lodged in judicial custody and directed that she appear through video conferencing at the next hearing to personally confirm her access to treatment.

Inside The Case

The court hearing the matter was formally designated by the Delhi High Court last week as India’s first Special Fast-Track Court dedicated to offences under the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024.

The notification followed Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s announcement that specialised courts would be established to expedite trials in paper leak cases after widespread protests over the alleged NEET-UG 2026 examination leak.

Before the case was transferred to the new court, another special court had extended the judicial custody of all 13 accused until August 6 and rejected the bail plea of paediatrician Dr Manoj Bhagwanrao Shirure, observing that the investigation prima facie indicated he was an active conspirator in an organised paper leak network.

The National Testing Agency (NTA) had cancelled the original NEET-UG examination conducted on May 3 following allegations of a question paper leak, with a re-examination later held on June 21. The CBI continues to investigate the alleged conspiracy involving brokers, middlemen and candidates.

The Logical Indian’s Perspective

Competitive examinations shape the futures of millions of young people, making transparency and accountability essential to preserving public trust.

While the creation of fast-track courts reflects an effort to ensure timely justice, procedural lapses such as the absence of prosecuting counsel during the very first hearing risk undermining public confidence in that objective.

Every institution involved, from investigating agencies to the judiciary, must work with diligence and coordination to ensure that justice is not only delivered but also seen to be delivered.

At the same time, the rights of the accused, the concerns of students and the integrity of the examination system deserve equal attention. As the legal process moves forward, what more can institutions do to reassure students that India’s public examinations are fair, secure and worthy of their trust?

Also Read: PM Modi Sets Up High-Powered Task Force Under Infosys Co-Founder Nandan Nilekani to Reform India’s Exam System

#PoweredByYou We bring you news and stories that are worth your attention! Stories that are relevant, reliable, contextual and unbiased. If you read us, watch us, and like what we do, then show us some love! Good journalism is expensive to produce and we have come this far only with your support. Keep encouraging independent media organisations and independent journalists. We always want to remain answerable to you and not to anyone else.

Featured

Amplified by

Amazon Prime

For Two Nights in June, Mumbai’s Sea Link and Asiatic Library Wore Light Like They’ve Never Worn It Before

Amplified by

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

From Risky to Safe: Sadak Suraksha Abhiyan Makes India’s Roads Secure Nationwide

Recent Stories

Homemade Mat to Glory: Farmer’s Son Sarvesh Kushare Wins Historic CWG High Jump Silver

People of Purpose: Reimagining the Purpose of Education and Success, Vishal Talreja’s Journey with Dream a Dream

People of Purpose: How Bipin Dhane & Ayang Trust Are Transforming Education in Majuli

Contributors

Writer : 
Editor : 
Creatives :