Maharashtra recorded a tragic 781 farmer suicides in the first nine months of 2025 (January to September), with the primary drivers being debt, severe crop failure, and excessive rainfall, according to state Relief Minister Makarand Jadhav’s statement to the Legislative Council.
This figure confirms the state’s position as the epicentre of India’s agrarian crisis, a situation underscored by NCRB data showing nearly one in every two farmer suicides in the country occurs in Maharashtra.
The crisis has sparked fierce parliamentary criticism, with opposition leaders alleging severe failures in the government’s relief delivery mechanisms and a large-scale deficit of empathy.
Devastating Toll Across Vulnerable Regions
The official figures reveal a crisis concentrated in the state’s most vulnerable agricultural belts. According to a report by The Times of India, the Vidarbha region, specifically the Nagpur division, recorded the highest number of deaths with a staggering 296 farmer suicides.
Following closely was the Marathwada region, which accounted for 212 cases in the same nine-month period. These statistics highlight the disproportionate impact of market volatility and climate change on farmers in these rain-fed regions, making their struggle to repay loans after a failed harvest particularly acute and often fatal.
Minister Confirms Crisis
Relief and Rehabilitation Minister Makarand Jadhav (Patil), in his written reply to the Legislative Council, confirmed the total figure of 781 suicides and attributed the causes to mounting loans, crop losses, and excessive rains.
Jadhav referenced National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) 2023 data to contextualise the crisis, noting that one in every two farmer suicides nationally occurs in Maharashtra.
The minister assured the House that the government is implementing measures such as ensuring fair prices, expanding irrigation, and operating disaster relief centres to prevent further deaths, although the effectiveness of these measures remains highly disputed.
MP Fauzia Khan Slams Relief Failures
The government’s response drew sharp criticism from the opposition, most notably from NCP-SCP MP Fauzia Khan, who addressed the Rajya Sabha on the crisis.
Khan highlighted a separate three-month period where 766 farmer suicides were reported, stating that only 676 families had received government aid while 200 were denied assistance.
She also condemned the gap between the announced ₹31,628-crore relief package for flood damage and the grim reality on the ground. Khan pointed out, according to TOI, that only ₹82 crore was ultimately deposited into the bank accounts of just over one lakh farmers, despite a much larger allocation.
Today in the Rajya Sabha, during Zero Hour, I raised urgent concerns over the severe distress facing farmers in Maharashtra after this year’s floods. Nearly 68.7 lakh hectares of crops across 29 districts were damaged, impacting close to 60 lakh farmers.
— Fauzia Khan (@DrFauziaKhanNCP) December 11, 2025
Despite a ₹31,628 crore… pic.twitter.com/z3raWFth1y
Discrepancy in Disaster Reporting
MP Khan also exposed a critical discrepancy in official reporting that potentially limited central aid. She cited figures showing that while the State Agriculture Minister had previously confirmed that floods affected 14.36 lakh hectares of crop area, the official report submitted to the Centre cited a much smaller figure of only 1,10,309 hectares.
Khan called this huge difference “unfair and a joke with the farmers,” arguing that this data manipulation or error prevents the state from seeking adequate disaster relief, leaving lakhs of farmers without the financial lifeline they urgently need for survival and recovery.
The Logical Indian’s Perspective
The chronic repetition of these tragic statistics year after year confirms that Maharashtra’s agrarian crisis is a fundamental systemic failure, not merely a seasonal setback.
The minister’s assurance of ‘implemented measures’ rings hollow when juxtaposed with the alarming suicide rate and the opposition’s proof of aid being blocked or denied to hundreds of grieving families.
The alleged discrepancy in land damage reporting is particularly egregious, suggesting administrative incompetence or deliberate efforts to obscure the true scale of the disaster.

